On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:13:33PM +1000, Russell wrote:
Bob Nielsen wrote:
AFAIK, the symlink is mostly used when compiling source which looks for
headers in /usr/src/linux/include.
That's what i understood, for other distros. I think for debian
you're supposed to do: ln -s
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:54:34PM -0700, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Lastly, are you aware of following facts (Content from recent post by
prominent Debian person. I am worried about mine ...):
* kernel header files for user application
Some may still say:
The problem under Debian and SuSE is
Colin Watson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:13:33PM +1000, Russell wrote:
Bob Nielsen wrote:
AFAIK, the symlink is mostly used when compiling source which looks for
headers in /usr/src/linux/include.
That's what i understood, for other distros. I think for debian
you're
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 09:25:55PM +1000, Russell wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
There's no such directory - just /usr/include/linux (for the kernel
headers against which glibc was compiled, to be used when compiling
userspace programs) and /usr/src/linux/include etc. (for the headers of
the
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Did you read make-kpkg documentation especially by Kent West?
I think instead of reinventing wheel, suppliment existing good document
as patch bug report.
/usr/share/doc/make-kpkg/README.gz (last section is by Kent)
For this, use unstable
Hello,
This is still a draft. This is a request for advanced users to take a look
see and add comments or suggestions. The idea is a step by step instruction
for Fresh New to Linux/Debian users, with the hope that they will be
encouraged to attempt a rebuild of their kernel almost first thing
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:19:48 -0700 Michael Olds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[ ]1.b. if no /usr/src/linux dir exists, make it
$ cd /usr/src
$ mkdir linux
(snip)
[ ]1.d create a symbolic link to /usr/src/linux
$ ln -s /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18 /usr/src/linux
Doing 1.b.
/usr/src/linux
$ ln -s /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18 /usr/src/linux
Best Wishes!
Mike Olds www.buddhadust.org
-Original Message-
From: Jamin W.Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Rebuilding the Kernel Mini HOW
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:25:07 -0700 Michael Olds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am still in a fog in terms of simple things like symlinks. What you
want is to end up with a link in the linux directory called
kernel-source-2.4.18 that links to /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18. So how
should that be
: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Rebuilding the Kernel Mini HOW TO
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 15:25:07 -0700 Michael Olds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am still in a fog in terms of simple things like symlinks. What you
want is to end up with a link in the linux directory
. Org
Subject: Rebuilding the Kernel Mini HOW TO
Hello,
This is still a draft. This is a request for advanced users to take a look
see and add comments or suggestions. The idea is a step by step instruction
for Fresh New to Linux/Debian users, with the hope that they will be
encouraged to attempt
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 4:41 PM
To: 'Michael Olds'; Debian-User@Lists. Debian. Org
Subject: RE: Rebuilding the Kernel Mini HOW TO
I found this document bery useful.
http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.en.html
Michael Olds wrote:
Thank you,
I am still in a fog in terms of simple things like symlinks. What you want
is to end up with a link in the linux directory called kernel-source-2.4.18
that links to /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.18. So how should that be said?
[ ]1.d create a symbolic link
We're getting there.
Yes, I have it incorrectly, what is wanted is that step five should read:
[ ]5. # cd to /usr/src/linux/kernel-source-2.4.18
Corrected, thanks.
I'm not sure that is what you want to do; what you want is your kernel source
in a folder that clearly identifies it by
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:08:46AM +1000, Russell wrote:
Michael Olds wrote:
Thank you,
I am still in a fog in terms of simple things like symlinks. What you want
is to end up with a link in the linux directory called kernel-source-2.4.18
that links to
Hi,
Did you read make-kpkg documentation especially by Kent West?
I think instead of reinventing wheel, suppliment existing good document
as patch bug report.
/usr/share/doc/make-kpkg/README.gz (last section is by Kent)
For this, use unstable version.
Also my Debian Reference has a (good)
Bob Nielsen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 11:08:46AM +1000, Russell wrote:
Michael Olds wrote:
Thank you,
I am still in a fog in terms of simple things like symlinks. What you want
is to end up with a link in the linux directory called kernel-source-2.4.18
that links to
Hi,
Looks like using /usr/src/linux is fine but linking /usr/include/linux
and /usr/include/asm to real kernel was the problem.
Osamu
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +
Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian
Olds www.buddhadust.org
-Original Message-
From: Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Rebuilding the Kernel Mini HOW TO
We're getting there.
Yes, I have it incorrectly, what is wanted is that step five should read
Michael Olds wrote:
Thanks Bruce, please see my response to Russell...there is some kind of
misunderstanding (no doubt in my head) about the meaning of link and whether
a link is to or from, etc. What I described actually worked, so I need to
figure out how to say it so everyone will
-Original Message-
From: Osamu Aoki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osamu
Aoki
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 6:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Michael Olds
Subject: Re: Rebuilding the Kernel Mini HOW TO
Hi,
Did you read make-kpkg documentation especially by Kent West?
I think instead
21 matches
Mail list logo
