On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 09:46:45AM -0400, Stephen Powell uttered:
> You're welcome to search our archives. But don't post here unless you
> run Debian, want to know how your system works, and are willing to help
> others as well as yourself. I'm not trying to be unkind. I have nothing
> against
Andrew M.A. Cater put forth on 4/11/2010 6:54 PM:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 08:58:59AM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 07:56:10AM +0100, Lisi wrote:
>>> On Saturday 10 April 2010 22:12:04 Dotan Cohen wrote:
On 10 April 2010 00:42, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
But you do u
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 08:58:59AM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 07:56:10AM +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 April 2010 22:12:04 Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > > On 10 April 2010 00:42, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > >
> > > But you do understand that desktop users _don't_ want to learn
> You're welcome to search our archives. But don't post here unless you
> run Debian, want to know how your system works, and are willing to help
> others as well as yourself. I'm not trying to be unkind. I have nothing
> against you personally. But it is not fair for you to run another OS and
; derivative of the thread
> "[OT] Ubuntu vs Debian forums (was recompiling the kernel with a
> different version name" and *I* decide what this thread is about.
> Please don't hijack my thread.
> If you want to start a thread that says Ubuntu is better than Debian,
> then go
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:59:48 + (UTC)
Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:51:01 +0200, godo wrote:
...
> > We can talk about everything not just Linux OS on
> > d-community-offto...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> >
> > Why not ask there?
>
> Because I sincerely think that things like i.e.,
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:51:01 +0200, godo wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> I acknowledge every list has it own rules but true is that some
>> questions are so wide that are also valid for any kind of linux flavour
>> and every list user will get benefit from the responses.
>>
>> And
Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:46:45 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
(...)
You're welcome to search our archives. But don't post here unless you
run Debian, want to know how your system works, and are willing to help
others as well as yourself. I'm not trying to be unkind. I have
noth
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:46:45 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
(...)
> You're welcome to search our archives. But don't post here unless you
> run Debian, want to know how your system works, and are willing to help
> others as well as yourself. I'm not trying to be unkind. I have
> nothing against
ad is about. I am the OP of this
derivative of the thread
"[OT] Ubuntu vs Debian forums (was recompiling the kernel with a
different version name" and *I* decide what this thread is about.
Please don't hijack my thread.
If you want to start a thread that says Ubuntu is better th
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 07:56:10AM +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Saturday 10 April 2010 22:12:04 Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > On 10 April 2010 00:42, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > > Stephen Powell put forth on 4/8/2010 9:38 PM:
> > >> For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
> > >>
> > >>
Nuno Magalhães wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:29, godo wrote:
Sure, but first you have to take care at least of these issues:
* proprietary drivers (if applicable and/or needed)
* multimedia stuff (add debian-multimedia repos)
* backports for:
- wicd or network-manager (if applicable, espe
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:29, godo wrote:
>
>> Sure, but first you have to take care at least of these issues:
>>
>> * proprietary drivers (if applicable and/or needed)
>> * multimedia stuff (add debian-multimedia repos)
>> * backports for:
>> - wicd or network-manager (if applicable, especially
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:49, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> That is exactly what I do! However, I use a Debian derivative as it
> has slightly better hardware support out of the box and more
> up-to-date packages than straight Debian. That is exactly what this
> thread is about.
For personal use i prefe
Sure, but first you have to take care at least of these issues:
* proprietary drivers (if applicable and/or needed)
* multimedia stuff (add debian-multimedia repos)
* backports for:
- wicd or network-manager (if applicable, especially since
network-manager in lenny is too old)
- flash
>> No, these are normal everyday people who don't know what Windows or
>> what Linux is. They have a problem, they call me. No bitching, no
>> blaming.
>>
>>
> In that case there is no really meter what they have. Only you will do him a
> big favor if you put Debian because in that case they will b
> Are you saying that only those who want to learn to administer it should be
> allowed to use Linux?
>
No, no, not at all. It may have been like that once, but today anyone
can pick it up and use it. Maintain and fix it, no, but use it until
problems arise, most certainly. And for some distros, t
On Sun,11.Apr.10, 12:15:53, godo wrote:
> In that case there is no really meter what they have. Only you will
> do him a big favor if you put Debian because in that case they will
> be much safer from virus's and it's much easier to open synaptic,
> hit refresh button, upgrade and apply then man
No, these are normal everyday people who don't know what Windows or
what Linux is. They have a problem, they call me. No bitching, no
blaming.
In that case there is no really meter what they have. Only you will do
him a big favor if you put Debian because in that case they will be much
safe
On Sunday 11 April 2010 09:02:49 you wrote:
> >> But you do understand that desktop users _don't_ want to learn about
> >> their OS, correct?
> >
> > Recently I was trying to show my 15 year old granddaughter, who runs Open
> > SuSU 11 on her laptop, how to do some small admin job. She said that s
>> But you do understand that desktop users _don't_ want to learn about
>> their OS, correct? They want the computer to be as transparent as
>> possible in their workflow.
>>
>>
> If they don't wont to learn they don't have. That's way there is PC service.
> Tell me how much of them know solution f
But you do understand that desktop users _don't_ want to learn about
their OS, correct? They want the computer to be as transparent as
possible in their workflow.
If they don't wont to learn they don't have. That's way there is PC service.
Tell me how much of them know solution for some bigge
>> But you do understand that desktop users _don't_ want to learn about
>> their OS, correct?
>
> Recently I was trying to show my 15 year old granddaughter, who runs Open SuSU
> 11 on her laptop, how to do some small admin job. She said that she didn't
> want to know. When I queried this, she sa
On 11/04/10 07:56 +0100, Lisi wrote:
Recently I was trying to show my 15 year old granddaughter, who runs Open SuSU
11 on her laptop, how to do some small admin job. She said that she didn't
want to know. When I queried this, she said:
"When I am at school, the IT department does it for me
Lisi put forth on 4/11/2010 1:56 AM:
> On Saturday 10 April 2010 22:12:04 Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> On 10 April 2010 00:42, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> Stephen Powell put forth on 4/8/2010 9:38 PM:
For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
Give a man a fish and
On Saturday 10 April 2010 22:12:04 Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On 10 April 2010 00:42, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Stephen Powell put forth on 4/8/2010 9:38 PM:
> >> For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
> >>
> >> Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
> >> Teach a
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:12:04AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On 10 April 2010 00:42, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Stephen Powell put forth on 4/8/2010 9:38 PM:
> >
> >> For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
> >>
> >> Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
> >>
> Actually lenny is still on KDE 3.5, but you can get OOo 3.2 from
> backports.
>
Thanks, I was going from the info on distrowatch. I will look into backports.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://bido.com
http://what-is-what.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
On 10 April 2010 00:42, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Stephen Powell put forth on 4/8/2010 9:38 PM:
>
>> For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
>>
>> Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
>> Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
>>
>> I'd rather le
On Sun,11.Apr.10, 00:00:24, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> I was thinking of squeeze as (if I'm not mistaken, correct me if I am)
> Lenny is still on KDE 4.2.x and Open Office 2.x. KDE 4.4 is such an
> improvement over 4.2, and OOo 3.2 is worlds ahead of 2.4.
Actually lenny is still on KDE 3.5, but you ca
>> Stability issues and updates are the reasons that I switched _to_
>> Ubuntu! Before that it was the early Fedoras. I still think that my
>> favourite two Linux OSes were Fedora Core 3 and Ubuntu Feisty.
>>
>> Maybe I will give Squeeze a round before my next install. I've last
>> tested only Lenn
> (1) No need to CC me; I am subscribed to the list.
>
Sorry, I will try to remember. Gmail has random
to-whom-the-message-will-be-replied-to behaviour, and furthermore I
prefer that I get CCed. So I usually play it safe.
> (2) I see that you (and a number of others) have had fun with parodies o
> While what you say is true to an extent, there are a number of members of
> the Ubuntu list who are quite sharp. The Debian list on the whole is more
> informative.
>
I did not mean to insult the whole list. Users such as NoOp (who also
posts on openoffice-users) as tremendous help there. I real
> Well, squeeze my be well into the last half of its cycle. They are working
> toward a pre-release freeze now.
>
I was thinking of squeeze as (if I'm not mistaken, correct me if I am)
Lenny is still on KDE 4.2.x and Open Office 2.x. KDE 4.4 is such an
improvement over 4.2, and OOo 3.2 is worlds a
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:55:56 -0400 (EDT), Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 22:42, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> This is exactly the reason I chose Debian 10 years ago when I was looking
>> for my first Linux distro. I told a friend I wanted a server distro that
>> wasn't going to spoon feed
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 04:44:46PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Ron Johnson put forth on 4/8/2010 9:58 PM:
> > On 2010-04-08 21:38, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > [snip]
> >>
> >> For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
> >>
> >>Give a man a fish and you feed him for a da
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 22:42, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> This is exactly the reason I chose Debian 10 years ago when I was looking
> for my first Linux distro. I told a friend I wanted a server distro that
> wasn't going to spoon feed me, but make me learn something about Linux.
Slackware is usuall
Ron Johnson put forth on 4/8/2010 9:58 PM:
> On 2010-04-08 21:38, Stephen Powell wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
>>
>>Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
>>Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
>>
>> I'd rathe
Stephen Powell put forth on 4/8/2010 9:38 PM:
> For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
>
>Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
>Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
>
> I'd rather learn to fish.
This is exactly the reason I chose Debi
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 16:41, Wayne wrote:
> I guess it may be a sign of the times. The world has changed over the past
> 16+ years since I first joined this list. Sadly, for this list, not for the
> better. Maybe if we stressed your points 2,3,4, it might change for the
> better. One can onl
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
[snip]
> Stability issues and updates are the reasons that I switched _to_
> Ubuntu! Before that it was the early Fedoras. I still think that my
> favourite two Linux OSes were Fedora Core 3 and Ubuntu Feisty.
>
> Maybe I will give Squeeze a roun
Stephen Powell wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:00:39 -0400 (EDT), Dotan Cohen wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote:
For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
 Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
 Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
I'd rather learn
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:00:39 -0400 (EDT), Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
>>
>> Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
>> Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
>>
>> I'd rather learn to fish.
>
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Bob McGowan wrote:
> On 04/08/2010 07:17 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:57:17 -0400 (EDT), bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:09:09 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
BTW, does anyone know why Ubuntu users seem to
On Fri, 9 Apr 2010, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I run Ubuntu and regularly read the Debian list, so maybe I can answer.
That's my situation as well.
If I need to know where is the menus Firefox is, or how to change my
wallpaper, the Ubuntu list is fine. But nobody there understands
_anything_ about
On 2010-04-08 23:49, Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:31:33PM -0500, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:58:38 -0500
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 2010-04-08 21:38, Stephen Powell wrote:
[snip]
For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
Give a man a fish
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 05:26:20AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > Interesting. This is the opposite of my experience, where I started friends
> > out on Ubuntu as a way to break them into Linux but they found the amount of
> > updates annoying, and there were some instability issues at different
>
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:31:33PM -0500, Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:58:38 -0500
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > On 2010-04-08 21:38, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
> > >
> > >Give a man a fish a
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 21:58:38 -0500
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 2010-04-08 21:38, Stephen Powell wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
> >
> >Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
> >Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifet
> There's another proverb: Teach a man to fish and he gets angry for making
> him work.
>
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for an evening.
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://bido.com
http://what-is-what.com
Please CC me if you want to be su
> For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
>
> Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
> Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
>
> I'd rather learn to fish.
>
In this case it's:
Take a rope off their necks and you save him today. (get him off W
On 2010-04-08 21:38, Stephen Powell wrote:
[snip]
For some reason, this well-known proverb is going through my head:
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day.
Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
I'd rather learn to fish.
There's another proverb: Teach a man to fis
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 21:37:34 -0400 (EDT), Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> What I don't understand is why Ubuntu users *post* here, when they
>> actually run Ubuntu.
>
> I run Ubuntu and regularly read the Debian list, so maybe I can answer.
>
> If I need to know where is the menus Fi
> Interesting. This is the opposite of my experience, where I started friends
> out on Ubuntu as a way to break them into Linux but they found the amount of
> updates annoying, and there were some instability issues at different
> times. So I switched them to Lenny - sure it took a little more to
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> [snip]
> But the biggest reason that I run Ubuntu is to
> promote it. I have done tens of installs for friends, neighbours, and
> family. I need to be familiar with what they are running. Debian just
> needs a bit too much work, a bit too much
> What I don't understand is why Ubuntu users *post* here, when they
> actually run Ubuntu.
I run Ubuntu and regularly read the Debian list, so maybe I can answer.
If I need to know where is the menus Firefox is, or how to change my
wallpaper, the Ubuntu list is fine. But nobody there understands
Stephen Powell wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:13:22 -0400 (EDT), Bob McGowan wrote:
I run Ubuntu on my laptop, because I got tired of the manual Nvidia
setup every time the kernel changed.
I have been a regular on this forum for several months now, and I
know from experience that the topic of th
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:13:22 -0400 (EDT), Bob McGowan wrote:
>
> I run Ubuntu on my laptop, because I got tired of the manual Nvidia
> setup every time the kernel changed.
I have been a regular on this forum for several months now, and I
know from experience that the topic of the proprietary nvidi
On 04/08/2010 07:17 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:57:17 -0400 (EDT), bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:09:09 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW, does anyone know why Ubuntu users seem to want to use the Debian>
>>> forums? Don't they have forums of
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 09:57:17 -0400 (EDT), bri...@aracnet.com wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:09:09 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> BTW, does anyone know why Ubuntu users seem to want to use the Debian>
>> forums? Don't they have forums of their own?
>
> Yes they do, and in fact I find them
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:09:09 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 05:56:58 -0400 (EDT), Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> > ...
> > --revision actually took effect since the
> > generated .deb is now (note the 'lore01')
> >
> > linux-image-2.6.32.10+drm33.1-recompiled_lore01_i386.deb
>
On 04/08/2010 02:09 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 05:56:58 -0400 (EDT), Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
...
--revision actually took effect since the
generated .deb is now (note the 'lore01')
linux-image-2.6.32.10+drm33.1-recompiled_lore01_i386.deb
but what I need to do is to get rid of
On 04/08/2010 12:06 PM, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Lorenzo Bettini:
sorry I pasted the wrong name: --revision actually took effect since the
generated .deb is now (note the 'lore01')
linux-image-2.6.32.10+drm33.1-recompiled_lore01_i386.deb
but what I need to do is to get rid of '+drm33.1' which see
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 05:56:58 -0400 (EDT), Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> ...
> --revision actually took effect since the
> generated .deb is now (note the 'lore01')
>
> linux-image-2.6.32.10+drm33.1-recompiled_lore01_i386.deb
>
> but what I need to do is to get rid of '+drm33.1' which seems to be
> a
Lorenzo Bettini:
>
> sorry I pasted the wrong name: --revision actually took effect since the
> generated .deb is now (note the 'lore01')
>
> linux-image-2.6.32.10+drm33.1-recompiled_lore01_i386.deb
>
> but what I need to do is to get rid of '+drm33.1' which seems to be
> automatically added
On 04/07/2010 07:48 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:17:30 -0400 (EDT), Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
I tried also with --revision, e.g.,
fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=lore01 --initrd
--append-to-version=-recompiled kernel-image kernel-headers
but I cannot seem to get rid of that +drm3
On Wed, Apr 07 2010, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:54:53 -0400 (EDT), Celejar wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:48:18 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Note: you must always issue "make-kpkg clean" after running "make
>>> menuconfig"
>>> or after running "make-k
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 14:54:53 -0400 (EDT), Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:48:18 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Note: you must always issue "make-kpkg clean" after running "make menuconfig"
>> or after running "make-kpkg" with any target other than "clean". Otherwise,
>> v
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:48:18 -0400 (EDT)
Stephen Powell wrote:
...
> Note: you must always issue "make-kpkg clean" after running "make menuconfig"
> or after running "make-kpkg" with any target other than "clean". Otherwise,
> version and revision numbers will not work as expected. Assuming tha
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:17:30 -0400 (EDT), Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> I tried also with --revision, e.g.,
>
> fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=lore01 --initrd
> --append-to-version=-recompiled kernel-image kernel-headers
>
> but I cannot seem to get rid of that +drm33.1 string:
>
> linux-headers-2.6.32
On 04/07/2010 04:26 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:56:46 -0400 (EDT), Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
I've just recompiled the kernel from sources with the command
fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-recompiled kernel-image
kernel-headers
and installed it successfully.
H
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:56:46 -0400 (EDT), Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
>
> I've just recompiled the kernel from sources with the command
>
> fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-recompiled kernel-image
> kernel-headers
>
> and installed it successfully.
>
> However, the kernel name is
>
Hi
I've just recompiled the kernel from sources with the command
fakeroot make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version=-recompiled kernel-image
kernel-headers
and installed it successfully.
However, the kernel name is
2.6.32.10+drm33.1-recompiled
and that "+drm33.1" seems to cause problems to Ec
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 11:07:01 +0800, Lian Liming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am newbie to debian. I tried to recompile the kernel 2.6.8 following a
> debian-kernel-how-to doc.
> And now, i successfully install the new kernel and it can work. But the
> problem now is that modules can't w
Upgrade modutils to latest version.
- Original Message -
From: "Lian Liming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 5:07 AM
Subject: Modules can't work after recompiling the kernel
> Hi all,
> I am newbie to debian
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 11:07 +0800, Lian Liming wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am newbie to debian. I tried to recompile the kernel 2.6.8 following a
> debian-kernel-how-to doc.
> And now, i successfully install the new kernel and it can work. But the
> problem now is that modules can't work on my new kernel
Hi all,
I am newbie to debian. I tried to recompile the kernel 2.6.8 following a
debian-kernel-how-to doc.
And now, i successfully install the new kernel and it can work. But the
problem now is that modules can't work on my new kernel system.
I get the error message when using the command "lsmod":
Incoming from Luis Finotti:
>
> I did not quite follow your suggestion, though. It
> seems that I can't/shouldn't change the
> kernel-image-2.4.18-k7 manually, and even if I could
> do it, I would not know exactly how to change it...
No, you shouldn't. You should see from that config how that k
--- Roberto Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You must also, in addition to modifying the kernel
> command line, insert the apm module.
>
> # echo "apm" >>/etc/modules
>
> -Roberto
Great, Roberto! That just did the trick! Thanks.
Also, thanks to Keeling and Greg.
Keeling:
I did not
Luis Finotti wrote:
Dear all,
I recently upgraded my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.18-k7
(I'm running a 1.2GHz Athlon) and now my computer
won't turn off the power with "shutdown -h". (I did
the "apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-k7" way.)
The old kernel did turn off the power.
After I little resea
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 07:39 am, Luis Finotti wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I recently upgraded my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.18-k7
> (I'm running a 1.2GHz Athlon) and now my computer
> won't turn off the power with "shutdown -h". (I did
> the "apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-k7" way.)
> The old kern
Incoming from Luis Finotti:
>
> I recently upgraded my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.18-k7
> (I'm running a 1.2GHz Athlon) and now my computer
> won't turn off the power with "shutdown -h". (I did
> the "apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-k7" way.)
> The old kernel did turn off the power.
The confi
Dear all,
I recently upgraded my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.18-k7
(I'm running a 1.2GHz Athlon) and now my computer
won't turn off the power with "shutdown -h". (I did
the "apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-k7" way.)
The old kernel did turn off the power.
After I little research, it seems that
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 07:30:19AM -0500, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> Greetings-
>
> In expectation of a new palm pilot arriving soon, I need to add two
> modules to my system: usbserial and visor. What I've done in the past is
> to do a make menuconfig; select the new modules; make-kpkg clean;
> make
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 on 07:30:19 -0500 (EST),
Andrew Perrin wrote:
>
> In expectation of a new palm pilot arriving soon, I need to add
> two modules to my system: usbserial and visor. What I've done
> in the past is to do a make menuconfig; select the new modules;
> make-kpkg clean; make-kpkg --rev
On 2003-11-07, Andrew Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> even on my moderately fast machine. Is there some shortcut for adding
> modules to an installation whose kernel structure will stay basically the
> same?
Look at package ccache
I use it, and it caches compiling, so compiling the same kerne
Greetings-
In expectation of a new palm pilot arriving soon, I need to add two
modules to my system: usbserial and visor. What I've done in the past is
to do a make menuconfig; select the new modules; make-kpkg clean;
make-kpkg --revision xx kernel_image; make-kpkg modules_image; cd
/usr/src; dpk
* Matthias Szupryczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020911 04:07]:
>> [..] All seems to be ok except one thing, the module suport. [..]
>> Maybe someone can help me :))
> After you have created your kernel image with 'make bzImage' or similar,
> do the following (line 177-180 /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 11:45, Pierre Dupuis wrote:
> Hello Everyone :)
>
> So i finaly decide to upgrading the kernel..
> All seems to be ok except one thing, the module suport.
> It's strange cause i enable this module process in the xconfig menu
> ...But i haven't got a /lib/modules/2.4.18/
Hello Everyone :)
So i finaly decide to upgrading the
kernel..
All seems to be ok except one thing, the module
suport. It's strange cause i enable this module process in the xconfig
menu...But i haven't got a /lib/modules/2.4.18/ dir...
Maybe someone can help me :))
Pierre
--Pierre
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Michael Soulier wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:07:11PM -0300, Ted Gervais wrote:
> >
> > I want to make some changes to my kernel in my newly installed debian system
> > and am used to going to the directory where the kernel source is located
> > and
> > typing 'make me
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:07:11PM -0300, Ted Gervais wrote:
>
> I want to make some changes to my kernel in my newly installed debian system
> and am used to going to the directory where the kernel source is located and
> typing 'make menuconfig'. It seems that Debian does things differently.
>
* Ted Gervais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010404 11:06]:
>
> I want to make some changes to my kernel in my newly installed debian system
> and am used to going to the directory where the kernel source is located and
> typing 'make menuconfig'. It seems that Debian does things differently.
u can do th
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
>
> I want to make some changes to my kernel in my newly installed debian system
> and am used to going to the directory where the kernel source is located and
> typing 'make menuconfig'. It seems that Debian does things differently.
>
> How is this don
I want to make some changes to my kernel in my newly installed debian system
and am used to going to the directory where the kernel source is located and
typing 'make menuconfig'. It seems that Debian does things differently.
How is this done in Debian. I hope I don't have to put the CDrom back
On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 12:16:10PM +, Adam Langley wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 09:56:46PM -0300, Ariel Manzur wrote:
> > is it possible to get a configuration file for the
> > current kernel, to load on menuconfig, so I can modify the configuration
> > from there?
>
> Here's mine - I hope
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 09:56:46PM -0300, Ariel Manzur wrote:
> is it possible to get a configuration file for the
> current kernel, to load on menuconfig, so I can modify the configuration
> from there?
Here's mine - I hope it works for you.
AGL
--
In an orderly world, there's always a place f
Hi.
I'm using the kernel that comes with debian 2.2, but I need to recompile it
so I can use an ATAPI CD-RW drive. I've downloaded the source, but I can't
go through all of the options on the configuration, because I always miss a
detail and the kernel doesn't work (tried 2 times alredy :(
So I wa
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:27:49PM +1100, Kieren Diment wrote:
> Due to lack of disk space I am having trouble recompiling my kernel.
> my system lives on hda2, and I want to use my redundant vfat partition
> on hda1 to recompile the kernel
> When I
> tar -x -f kernel-source-2.2.17.tar
>
>
Due to lack of disk space I am having trouble recompiling my kernel.
my system lives on hda2, and I want to use my redundant vfat partition
on hda1 to recompile the kernel
When I
tar -x -f kernel-source-2.2.17.tar
I get the following error:
tar: kernel-source-2.2.17/include/asm: Cannot
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
