All my 3 current Debian installs were originally installed from Woody 3.0r2
cdroms, using the 2.4 bf kernel. Then installed the 2.4.27 kernel to try and
get some sounds working. Sarge was still in testing at the time. I changed
the /etc/apt/sources.list to point to Sarge. IIRC the first Woody upgr
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:14:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > installation reports:
> >
> > reportbug installation
> >
> > upgrade reports:
> >
> > reportbug upgrade-reports
>
> Please don't file bug reports on "installation", "install", "installer",
> or other n
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> installation reports:
>
> reportbug installation
>
> upgrade reports:
>
> reportbug upgrade-reports
Please don't file bug reports on "installation", "install", "installer",
or other names that people like to make up. Every single one has to be
tracked down and man
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:47:31AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
Just enter "reportbug other" and it will show you the entire listing of
packages.
nice.
It's pretty interesting how much a person can learn from man pages isn't it?
To tell the trut
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:47:31AM -0800, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
>
> Just enter "reportbug other" and it will show you the entire listing of
> packages.
nice.
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:24:27PM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> >had to research the second one. Didn't know it was out there,
>
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Where did you go to research the package names? If it were better
> known, there
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 14:24 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
had to research the second one. Didn't know it was out there,
Hi Andrew,
Where did you go to research the package names? If it were better
kno
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 14:24 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > had to research the second one. Didn't know it was out there,
>
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Where did you go to research the package names? If it were better
> known, there might be
On Feb 14, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
had to research the second one. Didn't know it was out there,
Hi Andrew,
Where did you go to research the package names? If it were better
known, there might be more useful bug reports...
Thanks!
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
>
> If on the average one RC bug is fixed per day, it still takes 3 months for
> Etch to be released. This is just an estimate.
But you didn't take into account new RC bugs being filed! The RC bug
number has been hovering around the 100 mark (usually above it) since No
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:08:55PM +0100, Nigel Henry wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:18, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:13:08AM +1030, Stef Daniels VK5HSX wrote:
> > > After trying a Sarge to Etch update, I had to redo again, making sure I
> > > upgraded to u
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 17:18, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:13:08AM +1030, Stef Daniels VK5HSX wrote:
> > After trying a Sarge to Etch update, I had to redo again, making sure I
> > upgraded to udev a 2.6.12 (or higher) kernel prior to doing an apt-get
> > dist-up
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 12:13:08AM +1030, Stef Daniels VK5HSX wrote:
>
> After trying a Sarge to Etch update, I had to redo again, making sure I
> upgraded to udev a 2.6.12 (or higher) kernel prior to doing an apt-get
> dist-upgrade. It does fall over due to the changeover to udev and
> troubles u
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 07:52 -0800, Victor Muchica wrote:
> It will take its time, maybe march or april, DD are doing a great
> work, trying to fix all the bugs.
> Currently Im using testing on my Desktop PC.
>
> In the past some month ago I try to made an apt-get dist-upgrade, form
> sarge to etch
michael bailey wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a good idea of when the release of
> stable Etch is likely ? Is there any chance that it
> will be released in February or is March a more
> realistic date?
>
I would say that is really optimistic. But dont hold me up on that.
&g
On (13/02/07 07:52), Victor Muchica wrote:
> It will take its time, maybe march or april, DD are doing a great
> work, trying to fix all the bugs.
> Currently Im using testing on my Desktop PC.
>
> In the past some month ago I try to made an apt-get dist-upgrade, form
> sarge to etch, but too many
On 13 feb, 10:30, michael bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have a good idea of when the release of
> stable Etch is likely ? Is there any chance that it
> will be released in February or is March a more
> realistic date?
>
> I notice from the Feb 9th B
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 07:18 -0800, michael bailey wrote:
> Does anyone have a good idea of when the release of
> stable Etch is likely ? Is there any chance that it
> will be released in February or is March a more
> realistic date?
>
> I notice from the Feb 9th Bug rep
Does anyone have a good idea of when the release of
stable Etch is likely ? Is there any chance that it
will be released in February or is March a more
realistic date?
I notice from the Feb 9th Bug report that there are
still 104 release critical bugs to fix
19 matches
Mail list logo
