Peter Hillier-Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I might pose a supplementary question, can anyone suggest why the
default kernel on my AMD Athlon 3200+ is a '-486' version whereas on a
Pentium III it's a '-686' version: this is directly from system
installation. My understanding of the
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 06:40:09PM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
On (03/11/06 10:06), Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
You'd be well advised to use the package management system to remove the
kernels. Personally, I use aptitude. Having checked which is your
running kernel, go into aptitude,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 06:40:09PM +, Clive Menzies wrote:
On (03/11/06 10:06), Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
I did this on my server using aptitude and it didn't work. I '_' purged
two kernels that had been install with aptitude but it left the actual
kernels and initrds and configs
Following updates I find I have several redundant kernels and
corresponding entries in GRUB. Is there a preferred method of removing
these, once I have established stability with later versions, or is my
first thought of 'rm'ing the relevant files and editing menu.lst good
enough?
Peter HB
Hello Peter.
Peter Hillier-Brook, 03.11.2006 18:24:
Following updates I find I have several redundant kernels and
corresponding entries in GRUB. Is there a preferred method of removing
these, once I have established stability with later versions, or is my
first thought of 'rm'ing the relevant
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Following updates I find I have several redundant kernels and
corresponding entries in GRUB. Is there a preferred method of removing
these, once I have established stability with later versions, or is my
first thought of 'rm'ing the relevant files and editing
On (03/11/06 17:24), Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Following updates I find I have several redundant kernels and
corresponding entries in GRUB. Is there a preferred method of removing
these, once I have established stability with later versions, or is my
first thought of 'rm'ing the relevant
Clive Menzies wrote:
You'd be well advised to use the package management system to remove the
kernels. Personally, I use aptitude. Having checked which is your
running kernel, go into aptitude, and mark for removal those you want
rid of. If you mark the with '_' both the package and the
On (03/11/06 10:06), Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
You'd be well advised to use the package management system to remove the
kernels. Personally, I use aptitude. Having checked which is your
running kernel, go into aptitude, and mark for removal those you want
rid of. If you mark the with
Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Following updates I find I have several redundant kernels and
corresponding entries in GRUB. Is there a preferred method of removing
these, once I have established stability with later versions, or is my
first thought of 'rm'ing the relevant files and editing
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:24:23 +, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote
Following updates I find I have several redundant kernels and
corresponding entries in GRUB. Is there a preferred method of
removing these, once I have established stability with later
versions, or is my first thought of 'rm'ing
On (03/11/06 13:12), michael wrote:
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:24:23 +, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote
Following updates I find I have several redundant kernels and
corresponding entries in GRUB. Is there a preferred method of
removing these, once I have established stability with later
michael wrote:
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:24:23 +, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote
Following updates I find I have several redundant kernels and
corresponding entries in GRUB. Is there a preferred method of
removing these, once I have established stability with later
versions, or is
13 matches
Mail list logo
