>> lynx
>
> Much less capable than links2.
>
I see that I'm late to the party! I should have read the whole thread
and seen what was suggested before replying. I personally have never
tried links2, but I will try it soon. Thanks, Ron.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.i
On 02/16/2009 04:01 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
2009/2/13 Marc Shapiro :
Is there a light-weight browser that does not have a huge list of
dependencies?
lynx
Much less capable than links2.
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification
--
To UNSUBSC
2009/2/13 Marc Shapiro :
> Is there a light-weight browser that does not have a huge list of
> dependencies?
>
lynx
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
ا-ب-ت-ث-ج-ح-خ-د-ذ-ر-ز-س-ش-ص-ض-ط-ظ-ع-غ-ف-ق-ك-ل-م-ن-ه-و-ي
А-Б-В
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:25:50PM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote:
>> Is there a light-weight browser that does not have a huge list of
>> dependencies?
>>
>> I had been using dillo for things like reading html documentation and
>> other light-weight tasks, but then I upgraded
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 07:25:50PM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Is there a light-weight browser that does not have a huge list of
> dependencies?
>
> I had been using dillo for things like reading html documentation and
> other light-weight tasks, but then I upgraded to Lenny. Dillo is not
>
> I've been proposed Midori.
[...]
> It passes acid3 test.
Thanks for both links! I'm running unstable, just installed/updated a
few browsers to play and was surprised with the results.
- dillo: 0/100 (purged anyway);
- iceweasel 3.0.5: 70/100 (3.1 Beta 2 gets 93/100 according to Wikipedia[1]);
-
Cousin Stanley writes:
>>> $ apt-cache policy dillo
>>> dillo:
>>> Installed: 0.8.6-3
>>> Candidate: 0.8.6-3
>>> Version table:
>>> *** 0.8.6-3 0
>>> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>
>> Which indicates that dillo is *not* in Lenny.
>
> I don't recall doing anything special to install
>> $ apt-cache policy dillo
>> dillo:
>> Installed: 0.8.6-3
>> Candidate: 0.8.6-3
>> Version table:
>> *** 0.8.6-3 0
>> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> Which indicates that dillo is *not* in Lenny.
I don't recall doing anything special to install dillo
from any other source, but
--- On Fri, 2/13/09, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> From: Nuno Magalhães
> Subject: Re: Replacement for Dillo web browser
> To: "debian-user"
> Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 3:53 PM
> > I've been proposed Midori.
> I'll give it a try, thanks. I
On 02/13/2009 08:53 AM, Cousin Stanley wrote:
Is there a light-weight browser that does not have a huge list
of dependencies?
I had been using dillo for things like reading html documentation and
other light-weight tasks, but then I upgraded to Lenny. Dillo is not
available in Lenny. It is
> I've been proposed Midori.
I'll give it a try, thanks. I tried kazehakase and it does nice with
unicode. These are off-the-shelf approaches, maybe if i fiddled with
defoma or something dillo would do it. I have a wipeoutXL font
somewhere but OO.org doesn't seem to have it.
Nuno Magalhães
LU#4846
--- On Fri, 2/13/09, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> From: Nuno Magalhães
> Subject: Re: Replacement for Dillo web browser
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 3:21 PM
> > Or you can install Dillo [...]
>
> Ewww, my local site looks horri
> Or you can install Dillo [...]
Ewww, my local site looks horrid on dillo... No unicode, just a bunch
of squares, and no css either... I'd assume changing to a unicode font
would fix it (didn't), but why doesn't it apply the css?
Guess i'm OT-ing here... sorry.
Nuno Magalhães
LU#484677
--
To
> Is there a light-weight browser that does not have a huge list
> of dependencies?
>
> I had been using dillo for things like reading html documentation and
> other light-weight tasks, but then I upgraded to Lenny. Dillo is not
> available in Lenny. It is still in Etch and in Sid, but not Le
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:05:58AM -0800, Angus Auld wrote:
>
>
> --- On Fri, 2/13/09, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > From: Ron Johnson
> > Subject: Re: Replacement for Dillo web browser
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Date: Friday, February 13, 2009
--- On Fri, 2/13/09, Ron Johnson wrote:
> From: Ron Johnson
> Subject: Re: Replacement for Dillo web browser
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 7:30 AM
> On 02/12/2009 11:46 PM, Angus Auld wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> >
> http:/
On 02/12/2009 11:46 PM, Angus Auld wrote:
[snip]
http://misc.andi.de1.cc/dillo/dillo_2.0-1lenny_i386.deb
http://misc.andi.de1.cc/dillo/dillo_2.0-1lenny_amd64.deb
Or, since you don't *really* know what andi.de1.cc is or who runs
it, get the deb-src from either Etch or Sid and build it yourse
Angus Auld wrote:
http://misc.andi.de1.cc/dillo/dillo_2.0-1lenny_i386.deb
http://misc.andi.de1.cc/dillo/dillo_2.0-1lenny_amd64.deb
Thanks!
--
Marc Shapiro
mshapiro...@yahoo.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
--- On Fri, 2/13/09, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> From: Marc Shapiro
> Subject: Re: Replacement for Dillo web browser
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Friday, February 13, 2009, 4:58 AM
> L Glidewell wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 February 2009 19:25:50 Marc Shapiro
>
L Glidewell wrote:
On Thursday 12 February 2009 19:25:50 Marc Shapiro wrote:
Is there a light-weight browser that does not have a huge list of
dependencies?
--
Marc Shapiro
mshapiro...@yahoo.com
Kazehakase:
http://packages.debian.org/testing/web/kazehakase
It is capable of using either Webkit
On Thursday 12 February 2009 19:25:50 Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Is there a light-weight browser that does not have a huge list of
> dependencies?
>
> I had been using dillo for things like reading html documentation and
> other light-weight tasks, but then I upgraded to Lenny. Dillo is not
> available
Celejar wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:25:50 -0800
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Is there a light-weight browser that does not have a huge list of
dependencies?
I had been using dillo for things like reading html documentation and
other light-weight tasks, but then I upgraded to Lenny. Dillo is not
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:25:50 -0800
Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Is there a light-weight browser that does not have a huge list of
> dependencies?
>
> I had been using dillo for things like reading html documentation and
> other light-weight tasks, but then I upgraded to Lenny. Dillo is not
> availa
Is there a light-weight browser that does not have a huge list of
dependencies?
I had been using dillo for things like reading html documentation and
other light-weight tasks, but then I upgraded to Lenny. Dillo is not
available in Lenny. It is still in Etch and in Sid, but not Lenny. I
do
24 matches
Mail list logo
