Hi,
I think you are just using bad MUA's. My mail user agent can
distinguish between closed lists *where all correspondents are
expected to be members, and open lists, where a respondent need not
be on the list itself; and allow me to explicitly set how I want to
respond.
Tro
On Mon, 18 May 1998 09:00:43 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>On Mon, 18 May 1998 11:40:26 -0400 (EDT), Scott Ellis wrote:
>
>>I'm afraid Ill have to drag out this again. Please read:
>>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
>Read it, laughed at every point in it as every single part of it
On Mon, 18 May 1998 11:40:26 -0400 (EDT), Scott Ellis wrote:
>I'm afraid Ill have to drag out this again. Please read:
>http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Read it, laughed at every point in it as every single part of it is false
and misleading. It looks like it was written years
I'm afraid Ill have to drag out this again. Please read:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On Mon, 18 May 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 1998 09:07:52 -0300 (ADT), Trevor Barrie wrote:
>
> >> No, the reply I thought went to the list didn't because this list does
> >>
On Mon, 18 May 1998 09:07:52 -0300 (ADT), Trevor Barrie wrote:
>> No, the reply I thought went to the list didn't because this list does
>> not correctly set the reply-to field.
>Seems to me it sets it right... ie, it leaves it how the original
>sender set it. Stepping on a user's header is a
5 matches
Mail list logo
