Thanks to all who replied - it was indeed carelessness on my part. I
copied the information from my other debian machine, but took it from eth1
(the interface connected to the DSL router) instead of eth0 (the one for
the internal network).
Thanks,
Andy
---
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 05:58:46PM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> >
> > # In new Debian installations, this file is deprecated in favour of
> > # the ifup/ifdown commands (invoked from /etc/init.d/networking), which
> > # can be configured from the file /etc/network/interfaces.
> >
> > so I guess I
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:45:00AM -1000, Joseph Dane wrote:
> Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm not that well versed on calculating netmasks and broadcast address,
> > but these look a bit strange. You might try the standard settings:
>
> a netmask of 255.255.255.0 could only be
On 14 Oct 2002 11:45:00 -1000 Joseph Dane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just checked on my machine. I've got a file called
> "/etc/init.d/network" which brings up the interfaces and updates the
> route tables. it says:
>
> # In new Debian installations, this file is deprecated in favour of
>
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not that well versed on calculating netmasks and broadcast address,
> but these look a bit strange. You might try the standard settings:
a netmask of 255.255.255.0 could only be consider "standard" in a LAN
environment. the mask in the original mess
Hi Andrew,
[snips:]
Andrew Perrin wrote:
> In setting up my new machine, I've run into an odd problem. When the
> machine boots, the routing table doesn't get restored correctly. I have
> to type the following:
>
> route add 192.168.0.3 eth0
> route add default gw 192.168.0.3
...
> # /etc/n
I'm not that well versed on calculating netmasks and broadcast address,
but these look a bit strange. You might try the standard settings:
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.0.14
netmask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.0.0
broadcast 192.168.0.255
On 14 Oct 2002, 14:48:49, Andrew Perrin wrote
> In setting up my new machine, I've run into an odd problem. When the
> machine boots, the routing table doesn't get restored correctly. I have
> to type the following:
Either your Gateway or your NetMask are set incorrectly.
If your NetMask reall
Greetings-
In setting up my new machine, I've run into an odd problem. When the
machine boots, the routing table doesn't get restored correctly. I have
to type the following:
route add 192.168.0.3 eth0
route add default gw 192.168.0.3
in order to use any networking.
Here's my /etc/network/in
9 matches
Mail list logo
