Re: Rsync -- Different Outputs on No Transfer

2011-08-16 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
[ I accidentally sent this only to Hal, I meant to send it to the list. It seems to be my day for rsync comments. ] On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Hal Vaughan h...@halblog.com wrote: I'm using rsync on normal Debian (6.x), on two embedded systems that run what look like Debian variations

Re: Rsync -- Different Outputs on No Transfer

2011-08-16 Thread Joel Rees
This is just a shot in the dark, but, ... On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Hal Vaughan h...@halblog.com wrote: I'm using rsync on normal Debian (6.x), on two embedded systems that run what look like Debian variations (DNS-321 by D-Link and Stora by Netgear) and on OS X. Mac OS-X? hmm. May

Rsync -- Different Outputs on No Transfer

2011-08-14 Thread Hal Vaughan
I'm using rsync on normal Debian (6.x), on two embedded systems that run what look like Debian variations (DNS-321 by D-Link and Stora by Netgear) and on OS X. On Debian, whenever I run rsync (rsync --delete -rlptv -e ssh /my/path/ myname@mybackup:Backup/, if there are no files to transfer,

Re: Rsync -- Different Outputs on No Transfer

2011-08-14 Thread Ivan Shmakov
Hal Vaughan h...@halblog.com writes: […] It's not a must fix but when I'm scanning output files, obviously it's a LOT easier to verify everything went smoothly if I get a quick and simple output than if I have to scan a long list of directories. It'd be nice to simplify it so I can

Re: Rsync -- Different Outputs on No Transfer

2011-08-14 Thread Hal Vaughan
On Aug 14, 2011, at 10:08 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote: Hal Vaughan h...@halblog.com writes: […] It's not a must fix but when I'm scanning output files, obviously it's a LOT easier to verify everything went smoothly if I get a quick and simple output than if I have to scan a long list of

Re: Rsync -- Different Outputs on No Transfer

2011-08-14 Thread Ivan Shmakov
Hal Vaughan h...@halblog.com writes: On Aug 14, 2011, at 10:08 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote: […] My guess is that using -O along with -t may reduce the number of directories in the -v list. Thanks. I tried with -O and without it, along with -t and no -t (in other words all four