On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, "Luis R. Rojas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
> is thunderbir in the apt-get or aptitude tree?
Nicos Gollan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is in testing (0.5) and unstable (0.6).
It's also on backports.org if you're running stable.
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Saturday 05 June 2004 18:47, Pigeon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 04:43:18PM -0400, Luis R. Rojas wrote:
> > --
> > sic transit gloria fenestrae
>
> s/ae/arum/
I knew that looked wrong, but didn't stop to think. Go to the top of
the class, Pigeon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 04:43:18PM -0400, Luis R. Rojas wrote:
>
> --
> sic transit gloria fenestrae
s/ae/arum/
--
Pigeon
Be kind to pigeons
Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F
pgpkNZLw19qoc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Luis R. Rojas wrote:
> Vineet Kumar said:
> > As for recommendations: Mutt is the best mailer I've ever used
> > (and by far the most efficient, which is what you asked for) but
> > thunderbird looks pretty good if you like a mouse.
> >
> is thunderbir in the apt-get or aptitude tree? mine says it
Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Robert Golovniov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])[20040603 02:43]:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Could anybody, please, suggest me what is the most efficient mail
>> client under Linux from the viewpoint of handling S/MIME?
>
> Though I'm not using S/MIME, afaik both mutt
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:43:18 -0400 (AST)
"Luis R. Rojas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is thunderbir in the apt-get or aptitude tree? mine says it couldnt
> find it? in case it isnt. can you install manually?
It is in testing (0.5) and unstable (0.6).
--
Got Backup?
Jabber: Shadowdancer at jabbe
On Thu 3 June 2004 16:43, Luis R. Rojas wrote:
>
> is thunderbir in the apt-get or aptitude tree? mine says it couldnt
> find it? in case it isnt. can you install manually?
# apt-get install mozilla-thunderbird mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail
--
David P James
Ottawa, Ontario
http://david.jamesnet.
Vineet Kumar said:
> * Robert Golovniov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])[20040603 02:43]:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Could anybody, please, suggest me what is the most efficient mail
>> client under Linux from the viewpoint of handling S/MIME?
>
> Though I'm not using S/MIME, afaik both mutt and thunderbird
> shou
* Robert Golovniov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])[20040603 02:43]:
> Hello,
>
> Could anybody, please, suggest me what is the most efficient mail
> client under Linux from the viewpoint of handling S/MIME?
Though I'm not using S/MIME, afaik both mutt and thunderbird
should support it. As for recommen
Robert Golovniov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could anybody, please, suggest me what is the most efficient mail
> client under Linux from the viewpoint of handling S/MIME?
PGP is far more widely used than S/MIME in this day and age in mail
and news. I would suggest going that route instead.
--
Hello,
Could anybody, please, suggest me what is the most efficient mail
client under Linux from the viewpoint of handling S/MIME?
--
-=Robert & Beata Golovniov | Lviv, Ukraine=-
~~
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&B
11 matches
Mail list logo