Re: "S" file permissions

1999-07-21 Thread Buddha Buck
> (Sorry for the non-Debian-specific question.) > > Can someone explain what this execute bit means? > > IOW, what is the difference between "s" (suid) and "S" (?)? > > I've tried irc and one guy said it was something to do with an old SysV > standard. Someone else said it's "super-suid" or sui

Re: "S" file permissions

1999-07-21 Thread Jim B
al Message - From: Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jim B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Debian-user Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 3:11 PM Subject: Re: "S" file permissions > On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Jim B wrote: > > > (Sorry for the non-Debian-specific question.) > >

Re: "S" file permissions

1999-07-21 Thread Brad
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Jim B wrote: > (Sorry for the non-Debian-specific question.) > > Can someone explain what this execute bit means? > > IOW, what is the difference between "s" (suid) and "S" (?)? > > I've tried irc and one guy said it was something to do with an old SysV > standard. Someone

"S" file permissions

1999-07-21 Thread Jim B
(Sorry for the non-Debian-specific question.) Can someone explain what this execute bit means? IOW, what is the difference between "s" (suid) and "S" (?)? I've tried irc and one guy said it was something to do with an old SysV standard. Someone else said it's "super-suid" or suid without eXecut