silvain van Weers wrote:
downloading the latest netinst rsolved my problem! After figuring tat
knoppix 4.0.2, correctly identifies my sata drives I tried the
"testing" version of the debian netinstaller ! The installer was now
able to pickup my drives as partionable media! Cheers for all your
qu
downloading the latest netinst rsolved my problem! After figuring tat
knoppix 4.0.2, correctly identifies my sata drives I tried the
"testing" version of the debian netinstaller ! The installer was now
able to pickup my drives as partionable media! Cheers for all your
quick support!
Greetings,
-=
silvain van Weers wrote:
> I wonder how SATA support will be enhanced in linux in the future;
> seeing the posts of people having trouble mounting/installing SATA
> devices..
The problem is the version of the kernel that is used for sarge. 2.6.9 has
support for the newer SATA chips. Getting a 2
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 09:16:56AM +0100, silvain van Weers wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> First I want to apologize for my tiny knowledge of the debian system at all.
> I recently bought a Japanese Sony Vaio type VGN-S53B (which roughly
> corresponds to the american S series (e.g S250/S270).
>
> My f
silvain van Weers said...
> On 11/25/05, Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >Did you try to install the 2.4 kernel? Although some claim otherwise,
> > >the 2.6 kernel installation is impossible (it was last time I tried, a
> > >couple of months ago, and things seem to not have changed).
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 05:21:05PM +0100, silvain van Weers wrote:
> Thanx for your replies. I guess my laptop is too new... I tried using
> the older 2.4 and 2.6 kernel (and tried expert modes), but the
> installer just won't get past through partition step: "no partionable
> media found".
> There
On 11/25/05, Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Did you try to install the 2.4 kernel? Although some claim otherwise,
> >the 2.6 kernel installation is impossible (it was last time I tried, a
> >couple of months ago, and things seem to not have changed). Fact is
> >that 2.6 kernels detect S
silvain van Weers wrote:
On 11/25/05, Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you try to install the 2.4 kernel? Although some claim otherwise,
the 2.6 kernel installation is impossible (it was last time I tried, a
couple of months ago, and things seem to not have changed). Fact is
that 2.
On 11/25/05, Bruno Buys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Did you try to install the 2.4 kernel? Although some claim otherwise,
> >the 2.6 kernel installation is impossible (it was last time I tried, a
> >couple of months ago, and things seem to not have changed). Fact is
> >that 2.6 kernels detect S
Did you try to install the 2.4 kernel? Although some claim otherwise,
the 2.6 kernel installation is impossible (it was last time I tried, a
couple of months ago, and things seem to not have changed). Fact is
that 2.6 kernels detect SATA drives as SCSI, and therefore name them
/dev/sdaX. Problem
silvain van Weers wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> First I want to apologize for my tiny knowledge of the debian system at all.
No need to apologize; no one is born knowing everything.
[snip]
> The Debian installer was unable to recognize the harddrive, even
> attempting to pas "linux26" as parameter d
Hi everyone,
First I want to apologize for my tiny knowledge of the debian system at all.
I recently bought a Japanese Sony Vaio type VGN-S53B (which roughly
corresponds to the american S series (e.g S250/S270).
My first step was wiping all the WinXP stuff and reformatting the
harddrive in order
12 matches
Mail list logo
