Ron Johnson put forth on 7/4/2010 4:55 PM:
> On 07/04/2010 04:43 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 15:01:35 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>>
>>> On 20100704_154414, Camale?n wrote:
>>
Review your "/usr/src/linux/drivers/ata/libata-core.c" and search for
"ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ" string t
On 07/04/2010 04:43 PM, Camaleón wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 15:01:35 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
On 20100704_154414, Camale?n wrote:
Review your "/usr/src/linux/drivers/ata/libata-core.c" and search for
"ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ" string to find a list of blacklisted devices in
which kernel avoids e
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 15:01:35 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20100704_154414, Camale?n wrote:
>> Review your "/usr/src/linux/drivers/ata/libata-core.c" and search for
>> "ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ" string to find a list of blacklisted devices in
>> which kernel avoids enabling NCQ for some reason (slow/
On Du, 04 iul 10, 15:01:35, Paul E Condon wrote:
> But now I'm looking at debian.org and having difficulty figuring out
> what to do to get my /usr/src/linux directory created and
> populated. Can someone recommend a howto for deb-src?
The Linux kernel is special, because the source is packaged
On 2010-07-04 23:20 +0200, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Paul E Condon put forth on 7/4/2010 4:01 PM:
>
>> On my computer /usr/src/linux/ directory does not exist.
>
> That's because you don't compile your own kernels (or at least on that PC).
There is no reason to build kernels under /usr/src/linux.
Paul E Condon put forth on 7/4/2010 4:01 PM:
> On my computer /usr/src/linux/ directory does not exist.
That's because you don't compile your own kernels (or at least on that PC).
Google for "ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ"
--
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On 20100704_154414, Camale?n wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:04:56 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> > On 20100702_235713, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> >> >>> "ATA_NCQ_HORKAGE list"? The only hit that I get on this string in
> >> >>> Google
> >
> > I was involved in this confusion at an earlier stage.
On Sunday 04 July 2010 16:04:56 Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20100702_235713, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh put forth on 7/2/2010 9:24 PM:
> > > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > >>> software... What is NCQ? (in this context, of course) What is
> > >
> > > A way to
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:04:56 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20100702_235713, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> >>> "ATA_NCQ_HORKAGE list"? The only hit that I get on this string in
>> >>> Google
>
> I was involved in this confusion at an earlier stage. I'm still
> confused: What, exactly, do I type into
On 20100702_235713, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh put forth on 7/2/2010 9:24 PM:
> > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >>> software... What is NCQ? (in this context, of course) What is
> >
> > A way to have various requests "in flight" and let the disk itself order
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh put forth on 7/2/2010 9:24 PM:
> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>>> software... What is NCQ? (in this context, of course) What is
>
> A way to have various requests "in flight" and let the disk itself order
> them to get "better" performance. Whether it hel
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > software... What is NCQ? (in this context, of course) What is
A way to have various requests "in flight" and let the disk itself order
them to get "better" performance. Whether it helps performance or not
depends on the IO workload, the kind of devic
Paul E Condon put forth on 7/1/2010 6:47 PM:
> I'm lurking here, hoping to learn useful stuff about hard drive
> software... What is NCQ? (in this context, of course) What is
> "ATA_NCQ_HORKAGE list"? The only hit that I get on this string in Google
> is a link to this email to which I am respond
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:47:57 -0600
Paul E Condon wrote:
...
> I'm lurking here, hoping to learn useful stuff about hard drive
> software... What is NCQ? (in this context, of course) What is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_Command_Queuing
Celejar
--
foffl.sourceforge.net - Feeds OFFLine, a
On 20100701_001335, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Anand Sivaram put forth on 6/30/2010 10:25 PM:
>
> > Why do you say that it is detected as IDE. Normally IDE disks using
>
> I don't get this either. Nothing in anything he posted shows that the kernel
> is detecting this drive as IDE. Quite the contr
On 06/30/2010 11:37 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Josep M. put forth on 6/30/2010 2:11 PM:
The performance of this HD is very poor,my old computer, SATA1, was much
more fast than this SATA2 so, I'm looking how increase the performance
of this computer.
This 1.5TB Seagate ST31500541AS drive spins a
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:38:02 +0200, Josep M. wrote:
> I have a SATA HD, installed as SATA HD (not as ide in motherboard) and
> Debian squeeze detects me this as IDE.
"dmesg | grep SATA" will tell.
> What can I do for change his?
>
> Appended there is is the output of hdparm and sdparm
(...)
>
Anand Sivaram put forth on 6/30/2010 10:25 PM:
> Why do you say that it is detected as IDE. Normally IDE disks using
I don't get this either. Nothing in anything he posted shows that the kernel
is detecting this drive as IDE. Quite the contrary, it's being detected as a
SATA device, and if he'
Josep M. put forth on 6/30/2010 2:11 PM:
> The performance of this HD is very poor,my old computer, SATA1, was much
> more fast than this SATA2 so, I'm looking how increase the performance
> of this computer.
This 1.5TB Seagate ST31500541AS drive spins at 5900 rpm. Was your old drive a
7200 rpm
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 05:50, Amrit Panesar wrote:
> On 6/30/2010 1:14 PM, Josep M. wrote:
>
>> Hello Amrit.
>>
>> One option of the BIOS of the motherboard was allowing use with much
>> less speed, I don't understand how much how run this, because install XP
>> CD don't detect any SATA disk but
On 6/30/2010 1:14 PM, Josep M. wrote:
Hello Amrit.
One option of the BIOS of the motherboard was allowing use with much
less speed, I don't understand how much how run this, because install XP
CD don't detect any SATA disk but Linux treat disk as IDE, and now seems
that runs really much more fas
Hello Amrit.
One option of the BIOS of the motherboard was allowing use with much
less speed, I don't understand how much how run this, because install XP
CD don't detect any SATA disk but Linux treat disk as IDE, and now seems
that runs really much more fast, more than twice.
Josep
El mié, 30-
Hello Amrit
The performance of this HD is very poor,my old computer, SATA1, was much
more fast than this SATA2 so, I'm looking how increase the performance
of this computer.
Josep
El mié, 30-06-2010 a las 12:00 -0700, Amrit Panesar escribió:
> >
> >
> It did pick up that its Transport is Se
On 6/30/2010 11:38 AM, Josep M. wrote:
Hello.
I have a SATA HD, installed as SATA HD (not as ide in motherboard) and
Debian squeeze detects me this as IDE.
What can I do for change his?
Appended there is is the output of hdparm and sdparm
Thanks
Josep
mail:/etc/modprobe.d# sdparm --all /dev
Hello.
I have a SATA HD, installed as SATA HD (not as ide in motherboard) and
Debian squeeze detects me this as IDE.
What can I do for change his?
Appended there is is the output of hdparm and sdparm
Thanks
Josep
mail:/etc/modprobe.d# sdparm --all /dev/sda
/dev/sda: ATA ST31500541AS
25 matches
Mail list logo
