On Mon, 1 Mar 1999, Ben Messinger wrote:
> "Daniel J. Brosemer" wrote:
> > I gave it one last stab after the small success with your /etc/hosts
> > suggestion I figured there were more resolution problems, and so I bit the
> > bullet and enabled the builtin WINS server in samba, pointed the win95
"Daniel J. Brosemer" wrote:
> I gave it one last stab after the small success with your /etc/hosts
> suggestion I figured there were more resolution problems, and so I bit the
> bullet and enabled the builtin WINS server in samba, pointed the win95 box
> at it, and all appears to work. I don't lik
Subject: Re: SOLVED: samba 2.0 troubles (mostly)
Date: Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 08:23:11PM -0500
In reply to:Daniel J. Brosemer
Quoting Daniel J. Brosemer([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> On Mon, 1 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > In reply to:Daniel J. Brosemer
&
On Mon, 1 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In reply to:Daniel J. Brosemer
>
> Quoting Daniel J. Brosemer([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > This looks useful, I'll spend the time to find out how it wants to be
> > compiled sometime.
> Shhh, boy did I screw up! It was supposed to say DIAGNOSE.TXT!
>
Subject: SOLVED: samba 2.0 troubles (mostly)
Date: Mon, Mar 01, 1999 at 06:11:35PM -0500
In reply to:Daniel J. Brosemer
Quoting Daniel J. Brosemer([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > I'm having problems with samba 2.0 (the .deb in potato) that I was hoping
> >
> > I'm having problems with samba 2.0 (the .deb in potato) that I was hoping
> > someone could help me with.
> >
> > My win95 box cannot be seen by smbclient, and my linux box cannot be seen
> > by my win95 box. Both can ping each other, however, so I don't think it's
> > an ether problem.
> #1
6 matches
Mail list logo
