Hi.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 03:49:12PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > Hence "3dprint" is a perfectly valid hostname, compliant with RFC1123.
> > As shown (to me) by a quick experiment, both dnsmasq and bind accept
> > "3dprint" for both A and record, and it resolves successfully.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 04:44:05PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 03:36:45PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 09:21:55AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Saturday 17 April 2021 23:31:20 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > >
> > > It boiled down to some
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 09:21:55AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> It boiled down to something, someplace, not liking a hostname starting
> with a number, I recalled I had to rename another machine a couple
> months ago because it didn't work either.
>
> But I changed its hostname to dddprint, base
Hi.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 03:36:45PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 09:21:55AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 April 2021 23:31:20 Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > It boiled down to something, someplace, not liking a hostname starting
> > with a numbe
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 09:21:55AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 17 April 2021 23:31:20 Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> It boiled down to something, someplace, not liking a hostname starting
> with a number, I recalled I had to rename another machine a couple
> months ago because it didn't wo
On Saturday 17 April 2021 23:31:20 Gene Heskett wrote:
It boiled down to something, someplace, not liking a hostname starting
with a number, I recalled I had to rename another machine a couple
months ago because it didn't work either.
But I changed its hostname to dddprint, based on the previou
6 matches
Mail list logo