Re: Sarge, Bind9 (9.2.4-1sarge3) and DNS cache poisoning..

2008-07-10 Thread Mumia W..
On 07/09/2008 09:52 PM, John Elliot wrote: Hi, We have a couple of Sarge servers running bind9(9.2.4-1sarge3) that appear to be vulnerable to the DNS cache poisoning issue(Looks like port randomization was only introduced in bind9.3?) - As the servers cannot be upgraded at this time to etch,

Re: Sarge, Bind9 (9.2.4-1sarge3) and DNS cache poisoning..

2008-07-10 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Elliot wrote: Hi, We have a couple of Sarge servers running bind9(9.2.4-1sarge3) that appear to be vulnerable to the DNS cache poisoning issue(Looks like port randomization was only introduced in bind9.3?) - As the servers cannot be

Sarge, Bind9 (9.2.4-1sarge3) and DNS cache poisoning..

2008-07-09 Thread John Elliot
Hi, We have a couple of Sarge servers running bind9(9.2.4-1sarge3) that appear to be vulnerable to the DNS cache poisoning issue(Looks like port randomization was only introduced in bind9.3?) - As the servers cannot be upgraded at this time to etch, what is the recommended course of action?

Re: Sarge, Bind9 (9.2.4-1sarge3) and DNS cache poisoning..

2008-07-09 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/09/08 21:52, John Elliot wrote: Hi, We have a couple of Sarge servers running bind9(9.2.4-1sarge3) that appear to be vulnerable to the DNS cache poisoning issue(Looks like port randomization was only introduced in bind9.3?) - As the