Re: Score: Smail 1, Bob 0

1998-08-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"George" == George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: George> The upstream maintainer of smail has just totally screwed it George> up. My advice is to use smail ONLY for uucp and grab an old George> version ... say from buzz if you can find one. Do not put George> smail on the internet

Re: Score: Smail 1, Bob 0

1998-08-28 Thread john
George Bonser writes: > I have no idea why Debian ships with that piece of junk as their standard > mailer. Because we haven't been able to agree on what to replace it with. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI

Re: Score: Smail 1, Bob 0

1998-08-27 Thread Bob Bernstein
Progress report: A little more legwork and I'm now there as far as sending deferred messages. I had to a) designate my ISP as a smarthost, which I've never had to do before, and b) make sure the ISP's domain wasn't listed (inadvertantly) in smail/config as another host on _my_ system. That leav

Score: Smail 1, Bob 0

1998-08-27 Thread Bob Bernstein
I have just installed hamm off the 'official' CD and am struggling with smail differences from the earlier '2.0beta' CD that some vendors put out. This is the proverbial standalone machine hooked to an ISP via a modem. Q: I can only send mail when dialled up to the internet. smail will not spool m