Meanwhile I wrote a bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=513157
And if it is only to get an explanation for this behavior ;-)
Thank you.
Flo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
Flo wrote:
>> there may again appear files in this directory. I would expect to see
>> there
>> files only in the case the "update" command is interrupted. But may be
>> something
>> is wrong with apt-get. Time to file a bug report?
>
> I definitely did this sometimes. Not recently though. I will
there may again appear files in this directory. I would expect to see there
files only in the case the "update" command is interrupted. But may be something
is wrong with apt-get. Time to file a bug report?
I definitely did this sometimes. Not recently though. I will observe the
behaviour of ap
Flo wrote:
>>
>> Also take a look into directory /var/lib/apt/lists/partial. There may
>> be left
>> some files. I had to remove them by hand.
>
> I found there more than 400 files, mainly diff files, but some others as
> well.
>
> Is it better to remove them???
>
> Flo.
>
This directory belon
Also take a look into directory /var/lib/apt/lists/partial. There may be left
some files. I had to remove them by hand.
I found there more than 400 files, mainly diff files, but some others as
well.
Is it better to remove them???
Flo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.de
Flo wrote:
>>
>> I don't know the timing, but I wonder if it could be as simple as
>> mirror skew.
>>
>
> Probably you are right. I did the right thing at the wrong time. And
> spent hours on searching a problem which didn't exist.
>
> Nevertheless, thank you for your help.
>
> Flo.
>
>
Als
> >No, nothing special. I just have different sources in the menu.lst.
>
> Your GRUB configuration (/boot/grub/menu.lst) is an odd place to store apt
> sources. Don't you think the normal place (/etc/apt/sources.list) would
> be better? :)
>
Sorry, I was too stupid. I just had to edit menu.ls
On Friday 23 January 2009, Flo wrote about 'Re: Serious
aptitude upgrade problem':
>No, nothing special. I just have different sources in the menu.lst.
Your GRUB configuration (/boot/grub/menu.lst) is an odd place to store apt
sources. Don't you think the normal place (/et
I don't know the timing, but I wonder if it could be as simple as
mirror skew.
Probably you are right. I did the right thing at the wrong time. And
spent hours on searching a problem which didn't exist.
Nevertheless, thank you for your help.
Flo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
According to what you posted earlier today, apt doesn't know about
2007.dfsg.2-1 yet. Assuming you are on Lenny/Sid you might try "aptitude
update" to resolve that.
Or better: It doesn't know about 2007.dfsg.2-1 anymore. Because it did
know and downloaded the version.
aptitude update: T
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 04:04:28PM -0600, "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr."
was heard to say:
> On Thursday 2009 January 22 15:24:57 Flo wrote:
> >The second update must have confused it. How could it happen and, more
> >important, how can I fix this?
>
> Yeah, I'm not sure how that confused it, but it c
On Thursday 2009 January 22 15:24:57 Flo wrote:
>You are right! 2007.dfsg.2-1 is the uptodate version. 2007.dfsg.1-1 is
>the old version which is installed and should be upgraded.
According to what you posted earlier today, apt doesn't know about
2007.dfsg.2-1 yet. Assuming you are on Lenny/Sid
It looks like being installed but it isn't.
How do you know that 2007.dfsg.1-1 isn't what is actually installed? All
these seem to agree that it is what is installed. Could you do some sort of
sha1sum test to verify your version of the files shipped in this package
actually differ from the
On Thursday 2009 January 22 13:38:27 Flo wrote:
># aptitude upgrade
>No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
>
># dpkg -s texlive-doc-base
>Status: install ok installed
>Version: 2007.dfsg.1-1
>
># aptitude show texlive-doc-base
>State: installed
>Version: 2007.dfsg.1-1
>
># apt-cache
Daniel Burrows wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:18:22AM +0100, Flo was heard to
say:
Hi,
I think I am running into a serious upgrade problem.
I am running debian testing and I did the following:
aptitude update
aptitude -d upgrade
Now I have downloaded the packages but instead of saying
Thanks for your email.
I am running debian testing and I did the following:
aptitude update
aptitude -d upgrade
Now I have downloaded the packages but instead of saying 'aptitude
upgrade' to finish the upgrade I did:
aptitude update
aptitude upgrade
In the meantime I got another package to
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:18:22AM +0100, Flo was heard to
say:
> Hi,
>
> I think I am running into a serious upgrade problem.
>
> I am running debian testing and I did the following:
>
> aptitude update
> aptitude -d upgrade
>
> Now I have downloaded the packages but instead of saying 'aptitude
Flo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I am running into a serious upgrade problem.
>
> I am running debian testing and I did the following:
>
> aptitude update
> aptitude -d upgrade
>
> Now I have downloaded the packages but instead of saying 'aptitude
> upgrade' to finish the upgrade I did:
>
> aptitu
Hi,
I think I am running into a serious upgrade problem.
I am running debian testing and I did the following:
aptitude update
aptitude -d upgrade
Now I have downloaded the packages but instead of saying 'aptitude
upgrade' to finish the upgrade I did:
aptitude update
aptitude upgrade
In the m
19 matches
Mail list logo
