On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
how come nmbd and smbd are launched, although the links in all /etc/rcxx
to /etc/init.d/samba have been removed ?
I found the answer: it was obvious but rather unexpected:
the samba packages installs in /etc/init.d
the samba AND nmbd and s
On Vi, 17 oct 14, 22:26:02, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> >On Vi, 17 oct 14, 14:48:19, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> >>
> >> running: systemctl -a -t service | grep samba gives:
> >> samba.serviceloadedinactive deadLSB: ensure Samba
> >> da
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Steve Litt wrote:
are you all sure that the delay *does* happen during the shutdown of
Samba? If it turns out not to be Samba, you've just needlessly chased
your tail for hours or days.
I'm quite sure, because:
1/ there are a lot of bug reports against s
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Vi, 17 oct 14, 14:48:19, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
running: systemctl -a -t service | grep samba gives:
samba.serviceloadedinactive deadLSB: ensure Samba daemons
are started (nmbd and smbd)
This still not answers to my questi
t;update-rc.d samba
>and
>update-rc.d samba-ad-dc remove
>Then, the shutdown lasts a few seconds
>
>Thanks a lot for this valuable information.
>
>Question: the daemons nmbd and smbd are still launched by systemd
> at boot. although all the links in /et
On Vi, 17 oct 14, 14:48:19, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
>
>running: systemctl -a -t service | grep samba gives:
>samba.serviceloadedinactive deadLSB: ensure Samba daemons
> are started (nmbd and smbd)
>This still not answers to my question.
Why are you grepping for 'samba'
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Peter Viskup wrote:
Hi Pierre,
you can answer your question by yourself by having a look into directory
/lib/systemd/system and read systemctl man
page.
Small hint could be to run 'systemctl -a -t service' command.
Some more information about systemd in Debain can be read o
you need both:
> update-rc.d samba
> and
> update-rc.d samba-ad-dc remove
> Then, the shutdown lasts a few seconds
>
> Thanks a lot for this valuable information.
>
> Question: the daemons nmbd and smbd are still launched by systemd at
> boot.
> although all
amba, but only
saw a proposed fix about the LSB headers(which didn't work),
and not this one.
Actually, you need both:
update-rc.d samba
and
update-rc.d samba-ad-dc remove
Then, the shutdown lasts a few seconds
Thanks a lot for this valuable information.
Question: the
On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 23:26:32 -0400
Gary Dale wrote:
> Can't help you with the error message but to shutdown, have you tried
> the SysRq key? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_SysRq_key for
> details.
>
> This often gives you all kinds of ways of getting around an
On 02/09/14 10:49 PM, B wrote:
Hi list,
on my latptop (lightdm + XFCE) I can't reboot nor shutdown properly;
each command ends with a black screen with a blinking cursor at top
left and that's all. I waited several times more than 5 minutes,
hoping some timeout was there, but nope
Hi list,
on my latptop (lightdm + XFCE) I can't reboot nor shutdown properly;
each command ends with a black screen with a blinking cursor at top
left and that's all. I waited several times more than 5 minutes,
hoping some timeout was there, but nope; stopping with the power
button
On 2014-08-29, Michael Biebl wrote:
> But yeah, isn't it great if you can everything on systemd.
>
Systemd is wonderful.
I made a "little" mistake.
I'll shoot myself at dawn.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Am 29.08.2014 10:24, schrieb Curt:
> On 2014-08-29, Devrin Talen wrote:
>
>> Since it's related to the /etc/rc0.d scripts, maybe start with a bug
>> against the sysv-rc package?
>>
>> $ dpkg --search /etc/rc0.d/
>> sysv-rc: /etc/rc0.d
>>
>> You can check if your bug is already there (a qu
On 2014-08-29, Curt wrote:
>
> Looks rather like this bug (maybe samba, maybe systemd in its troubled
> relationship to samba or sumthin').
>
Forgot the bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739887
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On 2014-08-29, Devrin Talen wrote:
> Since it's related to the /etc/rc0.d scripts, maybe start with a bug
> against the sysv-rc package?
>
> $ dpkg --search /etc/rc0.d/
> sysv-rc: /etc/rc0.d
>
> You can check if your bug is already there (a quick search didn't show
> anything):
>
Looks r
David Christensen writes:
> If I manually unmount Samba shared folders imported by this machine
> prior to shutdown, shutdown proceeds without delay. So, the problem
> appears to be related to the order in which things happen at shutdown
> (?).
>
> Any ideas on how to trouble
Bump again.
Bump.
debian-user:
I have a Dell Inspiron E1505 laptop running Wheezy. I recently
recompiled the kernel with the realtime patch and installed some music
workstation packages (rosegarden, etc.).
On shutdown, the machine hangs:
INIT: Switching to runlevel: 6
INIT
Bump.
debian-user:
I have a Dell Inspiron E1505 laptop running Wheezy. I recently
recompiled the kernel with the realtime patch and installed some music
workstation packages (rosegarden, etc.).
On shutdown, the machine hangs:
INIT: Switching to runlevel: 6
INIT: Sending
debian-user:
I have a Dell Inspiron E1505 laptop running Wheezy. I recently
recompiled the kernel with the realtime patch and installed some music
workstation packages (rosegarden, etc.).
On shutdown, the machine hangs:
INIT: Switching to runlevel: 6
INIT: Sending processes the
On Ma, 29 iul 14, 19:45:44, bruninksb...@posteo.de wrote:
> Dear Andrei,
>
> Thank you very much for your response.
>
> # dpkg -l firestarter
...
> rc firestarter 1.0.3-8 amd64 gtk
> program
> for managing and observing your firewall
>
> # dpkg -s firestarter
Dear Andrei,
Thank you very much for your response.
# dpkg -l firestarter
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Naam Versie
On Du, 27 iul 14, 11:00:16, bruninksb...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> I do not have and never had the firestarter package installed.
Let's see what dpkg has to say about that, please post the output of
dpkg -l firestarter
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic d
then starts the shutdown process and reports the shutdown
process on my screen. Since 10 July 2014 it often reports that there is
a problem in terminating some processes. My computer then eventually
takes drastic measures to shut the system down. This succeeds and
finally the system is powered off
y, "to an appropriate script which is run during the Linux
> > start-up sequence" and "to an appropriate script which is run during the
> > Linux system shutdown". (It is silent on what those "appropriate
> scripts"
> > should be.)
>
> Debi
and "to an appropriate script which is run during the
> Linux system shutdown". (It is silent on what those "appropriate scripts"
> should be.)
Debian already does this properly in sysvinit mode. So Debian wheezy is
covered. Refer to /etc/init.d/urandom
For Debian jes
ded,
> respectively, "to
> > an appropriate script which is run during the Linux start-up sequence"
> and "to
> > an appropriate script which is run during the Linux system shutdown".
> (It is
> > silent on what those "appropriate scripts" sh
rt-up sequence" and "to
> an appropriate script which is run during the Linux system shutdown". (It is
> silent on what those "appropriate scripts" should be.)
>
> What should these scripts be for a Debian system?
I believe that the "initscripts" p
>start-up sequence" and "to an appropriate script which is run during the
>Linux system shutdown". (It is silent on what those "appropriate scripts"
>should be.)
>
>What should these scripts be for a Debian system?
Accordi
he
Linux system shutdown". (It is silent on what those "appropriate scripts"
should be.)
What should these scripts be for a Debian system?
Are there standard scripts in which to put such start-up and shutdown
code? Or is one supposed to put those snippets in standalone scripts in
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:38 PM, wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2014, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won
and lost many times across the Internet. Pl
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote:
have you looked at alpine's roles? Main menu > Setup > Roles.
Correction: Main menu > Setup > *Rules* > Roles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
Hi Bret.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Bret Busby wrote:
On 18/06/2014, Steve Litt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:28:45 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
Now, if only the list defaulted to "Reply To List", it would be good,
and, make replying to the list, easier...
As far as I know, it does. As far as I kno
On 23/06/2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Bret Busby wrote:
>> Tom H wrote:
>> > Bret Busby wrote:
>> >> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> >>> This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won and
>> >>> lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up again
>> >>> here. If you do really w
Bret Busby wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
> > Bret Busby wrote:
> >> Bob Proulx wrote:
> >>> This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won and
> >>> lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up again
> >>> here. If you do really want to do so please use the off-topic mail
On 23/06/2014, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>>
>>> This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won and
>>> lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up again
>>> here. If you do real
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won
and lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up
again here. If you do really want to
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 13:13:39 -0400
Tom H wrote:
> Requesting that you take a religious-type discussion (like a list's
> "Reply To" settings) to the OT list isn't trolling!
Let's launch Troll-CD, a pure ubuntu distro on a USB key,
multiple points of failure, etc.
--
If we ping Santa, is there
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>
>> This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won and
>> lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up again
>> here. If you do really want to do so please use the off-
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:53:14
From: Bob Proulx
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Reply To settings - was - Re: Debian 7.5 amd64 xfce GUI shutdown
and restart do not work
Bret Busby wrote:
email, for the latter, due to the power of PINE
Bret Busby wrote:
> email, for the latter, due to the power of PINE), and both show no
> presence of a Reply-To value having been set.
This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won and
lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up again
here. If you do really w
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 18:52:08 Bret Busby wrote:
> On 18/06/2014, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:28:45 +0800
> >
> > Bret Busby wrote:
> >> Now, if only the list defaulted to "Reply To List", it would be good,
> >> and, make replying to the list, easier...
> >
> > As far as I know
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Bret Busby wrote:
> Where a list (and, I am assuming that the mailing list software for
> this list allows it - from the full header, the mailing list software
> used for this list, is Claws mail) is configured to by default,
> Reply-To the mailing list, it generally is shown i
On 18/06/2014, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:28:45 +0800
> Bret Busby wrote:
>
>> Now, if only the list defaulted to "Reply To List", it would be good,
>> and, make replying to the list, easier...
>
> As far as I know, it does. As far as I know, everyone who replies to my
> stuff on
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Ralph Katz wrote:
> On 06/16/2014 06:21 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Not sure what you mean here. I can still run something like
>> gnome-system-monitor (although I'm on the lookout for a better program
>> for graphing CPU, RAM, network over time - if all else fai
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:28:45 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
> Now, if only the list defaulted to "Reply To List", it would be good,
> and, make replying to the list, easier...
As far as I know, it does. As far as I know, everyone who replies to my
stuff on this list goes to the list. As far as I know,
p;sort=relevance&DEFAULTOP=and&query=
Thank you for that.
In replacing the search value, with "xfce" and "shutdown", I found
that previous reference on this list, had referred to a problem with
xfce4, which I believe is later than the version of xfce that is used
in D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/16/2014 06:21 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Not sure what you mean here. I can still run something like
> gnome-system-monitor (although I'm on the lookout for a better program
> for graphing CPU, RAM, network over time - if all else fails I may
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/16/2014 01:52 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
> I believe that someone else has previously raised this problem, on
> this list, but I could not find the applicable message(s).
>
> I have tried to use the list archive Search facility linked from
> https
uns those apps just fine.
But more importantly: you haven't explained why any of this has, or
might have, impact on a shutdown problem.
ChrisA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
> The screen ends up grey, with the system hanged, resulting in (when
> that happens), an abortion shutdown - holding down the power switch
> for the 12 seconds (or whatever), which results in (amongst other
> things), on next bootup,
Hello.
In using Debian 7.5 amd64 xfce, I have been unable to get the GUI
shutdown and restart functionalities to work.
The screen ends up grey, with the system hanged, resulting in (when
that happens), an abortion shutdown - holding down the power switch
for the 12 seconds (or whatever), which
On 5/18/14, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 5/17/14, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Am 17.05.2014 04:27, schrieb Zenaan Harkness:
>>> I have no display manager.
>>
>> [..]
>>
>>> Also, I would like to see Shutdown and Suspend enabled, of course.
>>
&
On 5/17/14, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 17.05.2014 04:27, schrieb Zenaan Harkness:
>> I have no display manager.
>
> [..]
>
>> Also, I would like to see Shutdown and Suspend enabled, of course.
>
> Most likely related to [0].
> Make sure you have libpam-syste
Am 17.05.2014 04:27, schrieb Zenaan Harkness:
> I have no display manager.
[..]
> Also, I would like to see Shutdown and Suspend enabled, of course.
Most likely related to [0].
Make sure you have libpam-systemd installed and enabled and when
starting the X session to use the same tty a
is
>> just grey and unclickable and the shutdown-one, which is also grey and
>> unclickable.
I am back to this same problem, only "logout" appears, and even that
does not switch back to console 1 (from where I started with startx).
> There is a README in /usr/share/doc/xfce
t; partitions and everything.
>> I guessed it could be some kind of timing issue, so I passed the
>> delayroot parameter to the kernel, but that didn't change anything. Also
>> telling the kernel explicitly it should boot to runlevel 2 doesn't
>> change anything.
I passed the
> delayroot parameter to the kernel, but that didn't change anything. Also
> telling the kernel explicitly it should boot to runlevel 2 doesn't
> change anything. I guess there must be some service or something which
> forces the system (or kernel) to shutdown directly.
d boot to runlevel 2 doesn't
change anything. I guess there must be some service or something which
forces the system (or kernel) to shutdown directly.
In syslog I couldn't find anything helpful since it seems like it
doesn't manage to write anything there before shutting down the lap
Hope this helps!
On 19 February 2014 11:32, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Zhang Weiwu wrote:
>>
>> Using Debian 6.0. reboot/halt/shutdown does nothing except announcing the
>> shutdown and halt the ssh session that issued the command.
>>
>
> I would install systemd and se
Zhang Weiwu wrote:
Using Debian 6.0. reboot/halt/shutdown does nothing except announcing
the shutdown and halt the ssh session that issued the command.
I would install systemd and see what that would do.
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On 02/18/2014 03:13 AM, Jaikumar Sharma wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Jon Danniken wrote:
>
>> Hello list, I have a small script (foobar.sh) which I would like to run
>> at shutdown or reboot:
>>
>>> So what am I missing here?
On 02/18/2014 05:57 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> If you have cron on your machine, I think the easiest thing to do is to
> use the '@reboot' cron time specification, either in /etc/crontab, a
> file in /etc/cron.d or root's personal crontab. e.g.
>
> @reboot /usr/local/bin/foobar.sh
>
> assu
At one point you reported that reboot did nothing.
Was that reboot -f or just reboot - which calls shutdown if you're
running at 0 or 6 according to the man page.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
If you have cron on your machine, I think the easiest thing to do is to
use the '@reboot' cron time specification, either in /etc/crontab, a
file in /etc/cron.d or root's personal crontab. e.g.
@reboot /usr/local/bin/foobar.sh
assuming that's where the script is and it's +x
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hi Jon,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Jon Danniken wrote:
> Hello list, I have a small script (foobar.sh) which I would like to run
> at shutdown or reboot:
>
> >So what am I missing here? I'm guessing that using update-rc.d is
> >probably more heavy duty/inv
daemon knows
> how to kill without grace.
Hm. Fair point. Unfortunately, in my experience, a hanging init script
has halted shutdown many times for me - perhaps there's a setting
somewhere I can tweak.
--
Karl E. Jorgensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
I have exclude another possibility.
I am thinking:
1) perhaps the message in /var/log/messages is not produced by init,
but by reboot/halt/shutdown, and
2) perhaps init is not invoked at all.
So I run 'init 6' as
Hello list, I have a small script (foobar.sh) which I would like to run
at shutdown or reboot:
__
#!/bin/bash
if [ -a /test/foo.bar ]; then
mv /test/foo.bar /test/foo.foo
fi
_
I placed the script into /etc/init.d/, made it
produced by init,
but by reboot/halt/shutdown, and
2) perhaps init is not invoked at all.
So I run 'init 6' as root. This time, there is no new message in
/var/log/messages, prooving 1), and 'init 6' did absolutely nothing,
disprooving 2).
So, the problem is
ng service.
The first in asciibetic order is 'apache2'. If I stop it, it succumb easily
without hanging. I described previously that after issuing
reboot/halt/shutdown, the website being served by apache2 is still running,
hence init daemon did not attempt to shutdown even the earlies
Hi
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 04:29:17PM +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> Using Debian 6.0. reboot/halt/shutdown does nothing except
> announcing the shutdown and halt the ssh session that issued the
> command.
>
> But beyond that it really did nothing. Among the things it did not do
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Brian wrote:
Possibly of help:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/7114/why-cant-i-restart-shutdown
Thanks for the link but I am pretty sure they are talking about a different
problem. The link you provided is among the 100+ search result I found on
google that does not
On Mon 17 Feb 2014 at 16:29:17 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> Using Debian 6.0. reboot/halt/shutdown does nothing except
> announcing the shutdown and halt the ssh session that issued the
> command.
Possibly of help:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/7114/why-cant-i-restart-shutdown
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:08:34 +1300
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:01:25AM +, Joe wrote:
> >
> > Eventually a few more clues confirmed that it was an audio problem,
> > and suggested pulseaudio, which I had installed a couple of months
> > earlier for a particular experim
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:01:25AM +, Joe wrote:
>
> Eventually a few more clues confirmed that it was an audio problem, and
> suggested pulseaudio, which I had installed a couple of months earlier
> for a particular experiment. I ripped it out, and sound no longer
> worked of course, but my c
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014, Joe wrote:
Do you by any chance have pulseaudio installed? I ask because my sid
workstation started doing almost exactly this a few days ago.
No. It was a server box. What you said does hint me that if I can access the
physical machine there may be some clue on the scre
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:29:17 +0800 (CST)
Zhang Weiwu wrote:
> Using Debian 6.0. reboot/halt/shutdown does nothing except announcing
> the shutdown and halt the ssh session that issued the command.
>
> But beyond that it really did nothing. Among the things it did not do
> are:
&g
Using Debian 6.0. reboot/halt/shutdown does nothing except announcing the
shutdown and halt the ssh session that issued the command.
But beyond that it really did nothing. Among the things it did not do are:
- no process are killed or terminated. None of mysql, apache, cron daemons
are shut
On 1/24/14, Joel Rees wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> apt-get upgrade seems to have less "reboot requiring" updates.
>>
>> There ought be a way to schedule a dist-upgrade, to occur the next
>> time I shutdown my comput
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> apt-get upgrade seems to have less "reboot requiring" updates.
>
> There ought be a way to schedule a dist-upgrade, to occur the next
> time I shutdown my computer - not on hibernate/suspend or even logout
> (I
On Jo, 23 ian 14, 13:52:39, Darac Marjal wrote:
>
> When you are happy with the script, create an initscript for it that
> *starts* in runlevels 0 (halt) and 6 (shutdown). Pitch it to happen
> sometime between X (and other user-facing services) stopping and the
> network going dow
On Thursday 23 January 2014 13:52:39 Darac Marjal wrote:
> runlevels 0 (halt) and 6 (shutdown)
runlevel 6 is surely reboot? Whereas shutdown needs further
information: e.g. "shutdown -r" reboot, "shutdown -h" halt
http://linux.101hacks.com/unix/shutdown/
Lisi
--
T
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 03:08:29PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 23 January 2014 13:52:39 Darac Marjal wrote:
> > runlevels 0 (halt) and 6 (shutdown)
>
> runlevel 6 is surely reboot? Whereas shutdown needs further
> information: e.g. "shutdown -r" reboo
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:40:26AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> apt-get upgrade seems to have less "reboot requiring" updates.
>
> There ought be a way to schedule a dist-upgrade, to occur the next
> time I shutdown my computer - not on hibernate/suspend or even logout
apt-get upgrade seems to have less "reboot requiring" updates.
There ought be a way to schedule a dist-upgrade, to occur the next
time I shutdown my computer - not on hibernate/suspend or even logout
(I work on cmd line here and there).
Doing a dist-upgrade right when I'm shutt
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 14:28 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 11:07 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Simple:
> >
> > sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get --download-only -y dist-upgrade ;
> > poweroff"
> >
> > and do the upgrade the next day, under human supervision.
>
> +1
>
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 11:07 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Simple:
>
> sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get --download-only -y dist-upgrade ;
> poweroff"
>
> and do the upgrade the next day, under human supervision.
+1
Perhaps then directly
sudo sh -c "apt-get update ; apt-get --download-onl
On Jo, 12 dec 13, 16:15:44, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 16:10 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade -y ; poweroff"
>
> sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade --dry-run ; apt-get
> dist-upgrade -y ; poweroff"
>
> -y without a
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:21:34 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 19:17 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > Still, if one has desire to blow legs off:
>
> :D
>
> > sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade -y ; poweroff"
>
> but I would recommend
>
> sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 16:21 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 19:17 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > Still, if one has desire to blow legs off:
>
> :D
>
> > sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade -y ; poweroff"
>
> but I would recommend
>
> sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get di
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 19:17 +0400, Reco wrote:
> Still, if one has desire to blow legs off:
:D
> sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade -y ; poweroff"
but I would recommend
sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade -y ; poweroff"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ.
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:10:44 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:57 +0400, Reco wrote:
> > sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade -y && poweroff"
> >
> > That's more like it. Depending on a hardware, 'shutdown -h
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 16:10 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade -y ; poweroff"
sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade --dry-run ; apt-get
dist-upgrade -y ; poweroff"
-y without a dry run :S, OTOH, the OP want's to go to sleep, so the
dry-run
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 18:57 +0400, Reco wrote:
> sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade -y && poweroff"
>
> That's more like it. Depending on a hardware, 'shutdown -h now' can
> leave the power on.
:D We are clo
Hi.
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:58:35 +0100
"Gian Uberto Lauri" wrote:
> Osamu Aoki writes:
> > But I want one line solution :-)
> >
> > sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade; shutdown -h now"
>
> But there is the case w
Ralf Mardorf writes:
> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 15:33 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> > Sorry, it may ask if it has to preserve or not a configuration file
> > modified locally when a new version arrives with the package.
>
> Good point, I don't use apt that often, because my "main" distro isn
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 15:33 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> Sorry, it may ask if it has to preserve or not a configuration file
> modified locally when a new version arrives with the package.
Good point, I don't use apt that often, because my "main" distro isn't
Debian. I guess there's an option
Ralf Mardorf writes:
> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 14:58 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> > Osamu Aoki writes:
> > > But I want one line solution :-)
> > >
> > > sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade; shutdown -h now"
> >
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 14:58 +0100, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote:
> Osamu Aoki writes:
> > But I want one line solution :-)
> >
> > sudo sh -c "apt-get update && apt-get upgrade; shutdown -h now"
>
> But there is the case where apt-get want a re
301 - 400 of 1694 matches
Mail list logo
