On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
Even if the discharge of a firearm is illegal, doesn't mean that making
one is. The hack that you posted is not dangerous, imo. As you point
out, it is just a random string of numbers. However, applying this
random string of numbers
On 08 May 2007, Tim Wood wrote:
On 07 May 2007, Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 07 May 2007, Tim Wood wrote:
My thanks for all the comments.
I tried the latest ATI driver 8.36.5 but the included check.sh shows
the Xserver as 1.3.0 and there is no target for that.
In regard to the
BTW: Why is the latest fglrx driver only available for i386? AMD64 is
just at 8.31.xx
http://packages.debian.org/fglrx-driver
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Hart wrote:
Tim Wood wrote:
I'm another who has problems with the latest upgrade in sid's xorg.
My video is ATI Radeon X1600, which requires the proprietary fglrx
driver. This has been running well on my HP NX8420 giving me the full
1680*1050 resolution. The problem now as reported in
Jörg-Volker Peetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The newest fglrx-driver from ATI 8.36.5 supports kernel 2.6.20.x. But
for the other problem, the detection of X.org 1.3.0.0, I'm not sure.
From my experience fglrx works with kernel 2.6.20 (amd64).
But, it cannot use xserver-xorg-core 1.3.0. So you
On 5/7/07, Tim Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm another who has problems with the latest upgrade in sid's xorg.
There is lots of information in the BTS:
http://bugs.debian.org/fglrx-driver
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Wood wrote:
I'm another who has problems with the latest upgrade in sid's xorg.
My video is ATI Radeon X1600, which requires the proprietary fglrx
driver. This has been running well on my HP NX8420 giving me the full
1680*1050
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dominique Dumont wrote:
From my experience fglrx works with kernel 2.6.20 (amd64).
I would recommend using 2.6.21 on new HP laptops. Not
sure about this particular one, but on some models ACPI is totally
broken with anything before 2.6.21-rc5. And
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Wood wrote:
Tim Wood wrote:
I'm another who has problems with the latest upgrade in sid's xorg.
My video is ATI Radeon X1600, which requires the proprietary fglrx
driver. This has been running well on my HP NX8420 giving me the full
Linas ½virblis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, it cannot use xserver-xorg-core 1.3.0. So you will have to hold
xserver-xorg-core to 1.1.1-21 until (at least) the next release.
It can use 1.3.0 just fine, it just refuses to do so because of a dumb
version check performed by the driver.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dominique Dumont wrote:
If it's a dumb check, I guess I should try also to re-build the fglrx
driver *once* xserver-xorg-core 1.3.0 is installed.
To make it work _without_ the hack? No, it will not help. The check is
performed by fglrx_drv.so,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Linas Žvirblis wrote:
Dominique Dumont wrote:
From my experience fglrx works with kernel 2.6.20 (amd64).
I would recommend using 2.6.21 on new HP laptops. Not
sure about this particular one, but on some models ACPI is totally
broken with
Linas ½virblis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To make it work _without_ the hack? No, it will not help. The check
is performed by fglrx_drv.so, which is not built, but distributed in
binary form, and it has the check hardcoded.
Ok. Thanks for the info.
--
Dominique Dumont
Delivering successful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Hart wrote:
After a bit of investigation, I just want to point out that the hacks
that you provided are illegal. They directly violate the ATI license
agreement that one agrees to when installing the proprietary drivers in
the first place.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Linas Žvirblis wrote:
Joe Hart wrote:
After a bit of investigation, I just want to point out that the hacks
that you provided are illegal. They directly violate the ATI license
agreement that one agrees to when installing the proprietary
My thanks for all the comments.
I tried the latest ATI driver 8.36.5 but the included check.sh shows the
Xserver as 1.3.0 and there is no target for that.
In regard to the HP Nx 8420 itself, it is 3 months old, ACPI works on
both the 2.6.18 and 2.6.20 kernels in the 686 and AMD64 versions.
On 07 May 2007, Tim Wood wrote:
My thanks for all the comments.
I tried the latest ATI driver 8.36.5 but the included check.sh shows the
Xserver as 1.3.0 and there is no target for that.
In regard to the HP Nx 8420 itself, it is 3 months old, ACPI works on
both the 2.6.18 and 2.6.20
On 07 May 2007, Anthony Campbell wrote:
On 07 May 2007, Tim Wood wrote:
My thanks for all the comments.
I tried the latest ATI driver 8.36.5 but the included check.sh shows the
Xserver as 1.3.0 and there is no target for that.
In regard to the HP Nx 8420 itself, it is 3 months old,
I'm another who has problems with the latest upgrade in sid's xorg.
My video is ATI Radeon X1600, which requires the proprietary fglrx
driver. This has been running well on my HP NX8420 giving me the full
1680*1050 resolution. The problem now as reported in Xorg.0.log:
(II) Module fglrx:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Wood wrote:
I'm another who has problems with the latest upgrade in sid's xorg.
My video is ATI Radeon X1600, which requires the proprietary fglrx
driver. This has been running well on my HP NX8420 giving me the full
1680*1050 resolution.
20 matches
Mail list logo
