Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]

2020-08-01 Thread 황병희
writes: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 08:55:22AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: >> On Jo, 30 iul 20, 17:13:18, Brad Rogers wrote: >> > On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:58:10 +0200 >> > wrote: >> > >> > Hello to...@tuxteam.de, >> > >> > *PLEASE* fix your sig separator. >> >> What difference does it make for a

Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]

2020-07-31 Thread The Wanderer
On 2020-07-31 at 10:58, Reco wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 08:47:50AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > >> On 2020-07-31 at 08:37, Reco wrote: >> > It's a kmail thing. mutt, being a superior MUA, is not affected. >> >> Can you clarify both A: in what way this is kmail-specific, > > kmail apparen

Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]

2020-07-31 Thread Reco
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 08:47:50AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > On 2020-07-31 at 08:37, Reco wrote: > >>> Quirks are fine, when things continue to work. Your sig > >>> separator fails completely. > >> > >> "Fails" in what way? He doesn't actually have a "signature file". > >> He doesn't have a

Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]

2020-07-31 Thread The Wanderer
On 2020-07-31 at 08:37, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 07:45:57AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: >>> Quirks are fine, when things continue to work. Your sig >>> separator fails completely. >> >> "Fails" in what way?

Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]

2020-07-31 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 07:45:57AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > > On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:28:21 +0200 > > wrote: > > > > Hello to...@tuxteam.de, > > > > >I skip this newline. It's a quirk. I expect a teaspoon or two of >

Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]

2020-07-31 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:28:21 +0200 > wrote: > > Hello to...@tuxteam.de, > > >I skip this newline. It's a quirk. I expect a teaspoon or two of > > Quirks are fine, when things continue to work. Your sig separator fails > completely.

Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]

2020-07-31 Thread The Wanderer
(There is a non-negligible chance that I will be so nervous about the possible contents of replies to this mail that I will not end up ever reading them. I am occasionally subject to bouts of unreasoning terror about such things.) On 2020-07-31 at 05:28, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > I know, I know.

Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]

2020-07-31 Thread tomas
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:49:14AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:55:22 +0300 > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > Hello Andrei, > > >What difference does it make for a signature like his ("-- t")? > > It doesn't work. I won't discuss that further. Cheers -- t signature.asc Descr

Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]

2020-07-31 Thread Brad Rogers
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:28:21 +0200 wrote: Hello to...@tuxteam.de, >I skip this newline. It's a quirk. I expect a teaspoon or two of Quirks are fine, when things continue to work. Your sig separator fails completely. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _

Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]

2020-07-31 Thread tomas
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 08:55:22AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Jo, 30 iul 20, 17:13:18, Brad Rogers wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:58:10 +0200 > > wrote: > > > > Hello to...@tuxteam.de, > > > > *PLEASE* fix your sig separator. > > What difference does it make for a signature like his (