On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 09:56:43PM +0700, Dima Estudiante wrote:
> > Tastes can be so different :)
>
> Looks like our tastes quite the same.
> - Plain HTML with Caching is a robust but now days rare used.
> - SPA widely used, but with high resource consumption.
Glad I'm not alone :)
Cheers
--
t
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 07:39:44AM -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 6:11 AM wrote:
>
> > Gah, no. As a user I hate those with all my guts. Page "state" is
> > distributed in some intransparent way across client and server and
> > there is no way to refer to "something" via an UR
> Tastes can be so different :)
Looks like our tastes quite the same.
- Plain HTML with Caching is a robust but now days rare used.
- SPA widely used, but with high resource consumption.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 6:11 AM wrote:
> Gah, no. As a user I hate those with all my guts. Page "state" is
> distributed in some intransparent way across client and server and
> there is no way to refer to "something" via an URL.
Many modern SPAs track state via URL, so they can be referenced. A
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 07:07:09PM +0700, Dmitry wrote:
[...]
> P.S. It is so uncommon when robust technologies with low resource consumption
> are used, with SinglePageApplications no need to press F5, full data set
> downloaded per each request.
Gah, no. As a user I hate those with all my guts
5 matches
Mail list logo
