Vote for SW Flash filtering in Mozilla (Galeon/Skipstone, etc.) (was Re: How to get junkbuster to junk flash ads?)

2001-12-18 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 12:19:30PM -0800, Arno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 12:32:23 +0100 > Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Do anybody have a generic way to get rid of the annoying flash > > commercials so that galeon won't ask me to install the flash plugin al

Re: Skipstone has stopped working

2001-10-17 Thread Erik Steffl
Hans Steinraht wrote: > > Hi all, > > While using Skipstone it crashed. > After that I can't get it to startup again. > > I did a apt-get remove --purge skipstone and mozilla-browser, followed with a > new install, but the only what Skipstone says while starting

Re: Skipstone has stopped working

2001-10-16 Thread Hans Steinraht
something to do with Mozilla I file a report. Anyway thanks, Hans On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 10:27:45PM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 21:06:48 +, Hans Steinraht wrote: > > I did a apt-get remove --purge skipstone and mozilla-browser, followed > > with a

Re: Skipstone has stopped working

2001-10-16 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 21:06:48 +, Hans Steinraht wrote: > I did a apt-get remove --purge skipstone and mozilla-browser, followed > with a new install, but the only what Skipstone says while starting it is > a little spinning of my harddisk and further nothing. A new mozilla (0

Skipstone has stopped working

2001-10-16 Thread Hans Steinraht
Hi all, While using Skipstone it crashed. After that I can't get it to startup again. I did a apt-get remove --purge skipstone and mozilla-browser, followed with a new install, but the only what Skipstone says while starting it is a little spinning of my harddisk and further nothing.

Re: how to get Skipstone

2001-10-13 Thread Hans Steinraht
That was simple, I downloaded the single package. Then apt-get install skipstone and its working now. Yhank you very much. Hans On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 10:21:46PM +, Hans wrote: > Hi, > > I just started with Debian and now I want to install Skipstone on it. > The problem

Re: how to get Skipstone

2001-10-13 Thread Ross Burton
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: > skipstone: Depends: libstdc++3 (>= 1:3.0.2-0pre010908) but it is not installable > Depends: libmozilla > Depends: libnspr4 (>= 2:0.9.1-0.1) but it is not going to be installed >

how to get Skipstone

2001-10-13 Thread Hans
Hi, I just started with Debian and now I want to install Skipstone on it. The problem is now that whatever I try I get message from apt-get install like the one underneath. This is a message when I did apt-get install skipstone, but when I the try to get mozilla I messages just like this one

Re: Emacs browse-url.el and galeon or skipstone browsers?

2001-05-29 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Dave Carrigan wrote: > Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > galeon: > > > >(setq browse-url-netscape-program "galeon") > > > > clicking on a URL brings up a new browser each time, not > > recycling the initial browser. > > This was talked about a bit in galeon-user. >

Re: Emacs browse-url.el and galeon or skipstone browsers?

2001-05-29 Thread Dave Carrigan
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > galeon: > >(setq browse-url-netscape-program "galeon") > > clicking on a URL brings up a new browser each time, not > recycling the initial browser. This was talked about a bit in galeon-user. Based on my own findings, it seems that gal

Emacs browse-url.el and galeon or skipstone browsers?

2001-05-29 Thread Peter S Galbraith
There is currently a proliferation of Mozilla-based browsers (e.g. galeon and skipstone) which I'd like to switch to, but I won't without being able to use Emacs' browse-url. It's just too convenient. I have tried to use them with browse-url with the following results:

Re: galeon - skipstone?

2001-05-17 Thread Steve Cooper
Francois Gouget wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2001, Tommi Komulainen wrote: > [...] > > Hmm, now how on earth can I get all my cookies and bookmarks shared among > > all (mozilla, galeon, skipstone, konqueror, w3m) browsers..? > > Import/Export is really not an option anymore

Re: galeon - skipstone?

2001-05-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:42:01PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > I've used this trick too. > > > Galeons bookmark import/export utilities are pretty damned sweet though. > indeed, except for some reason it likes to put the mozilla export in .mozilla/default/Cache which is quite wrong... or a

Re: galeon - skipstone?

2001-05-17 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:24:01PM +0300, Tommi Komulainen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hmm, now that I started thinking about it, a lot of browser configuration > could be collected in one place. How many times have you cursed at the > different default fonts in different browsers? Or the prox

Re: galeon - skipstone?

2001-05-17 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 11:39:46AM -0700, Francois Gouget ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2001, Tommi Komulainen wrote: > [...] > > Hmm, now how on earth can I get all my cookies and bookmarks shared among > > all (mozilla, galeon, skipstone, konqueror, w3m) brow

Re: galeon - skipstone?

2001-05-17 Thread Tommi Komulainen
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 11:39:46AM -0700, Francois Gouget wrote: >I can't help for cookies. But for bookmarks, I long ago decided to > write an html file with all by bookmarks and use it as my home page. At > the time I did it to share them between IE and Netscape but the > principle is univers

Re: galeon - skipstone?

2001-05-17 Thread Glyn Millington
One of the many "obvious" tricks I would never have discovered for myself - many thanks from an eavesdropper! Glyn -- so here we are then http://members.tripod.co.uk/Christchurch2000uk Running Debian/Gnu Linux

Re: galeon - skipstone?

2001-05-17 Thread Francois Gouget
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Tommi Komulainen wrote: [...] > Hmm, now how on earth can I get all my cookies and bookmarks shared among > all (mozilla, galeon, skipstone, konqueror, w3m) browsers..? > Import/Export is really not an option anymore :-/ I can't help for cookies. But for boo

galeon - skipstone?

2001-05-17 Thread Tommi Komulainen
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 03:31:14AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > triggered. i have found mozilla 0.9 + galeon 0.10.6 to be the most > stable (and *fast*) combo yet. Have you tried skipstone? It feels slightly faster, I'm uncertain about the relative stability though. Sadly it lac

Skipstone [was Re: Karsten's browser reviews (updated)]

2001-05-15 Thread Jim McCloskey
I'd like to endorse the endorsements of Skipstone. For me, it's been fast, light and dependable (as browsers go). There's a lot that it doesn't claim or try to do, but for simple browsing, it's the best solution I've found (I've tried Netscape, Mozilla, a

Re: Skipstone, Galeon, in potato?

2001-01-23 Thread kmself
on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 05:50:52PM +, Pollywog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:04:05 -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com said: > > Note that while I *really* like the concepts, I find them less usable at > > present than Netscape. > Exactly, it is the same with Opera. I look

Re: Skipstone, Galeon, in potato?

2001-01-23 Thread Pollywog
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 00:04:05 -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com said: > > > > Well, I installed it and it freaked out my WM. A window kept coming > > up very rapidly, which read "Crash Recovery". > > I had to restart X to get rid of it. I was dead in the

Re: Skipstone, Galeon, in potato?

2001-01-23 Thread Jared Johnson
hi, i maintain some unofficial galeon packages; however, as of late, there have been quite a few problems which i'm now recovering from with the archive they are mirrored on and the macine they're built on and so forth. drop me an email if you'd like me to let you know when the sid packages ar

Re: Skipstone, Galeon, in potato?

2001-01-23 Thread kmself
7;m running Woody on my desktop, thought I'd stick to Potato for > > > the laptop. So I've got Galeon and Skipstone on the desktop. Have to > > > say I like the idea more than the execution so far, but they're both > > > sweet browsers. > >

Re: Skipstone, Galeon, in potato?

2001-01-22 Thread Pollywog
7;m running Woody on my desktop, thought I'd stick to Potato for > > > the laptop. So I've got Galeon and Skipstone on the desktop. Have to > > > say I like the idea more than the execution so far, but they're both > > > sweet browsers. > > &g

Re: Skipstone, Galeon, in potato?

2001-01-22 Thread Pollywog
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 01:56:35 + (UTC), Pollywog said: > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 17:51:33 -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com said: > > > > > Yeah. I'm running Woody on my desktop, thought I'd stick to Potato for > > the laptop. So I've got Gal

Re: Skipstone, Galeon, in potato?

2001-01-22 Thread kmself
on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 01:56:35AM +, Pollywog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 17:51:33 -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com said: > > > > > Yeah. I'm running Woody on my desktop, thought I'd stick to Potato for > > the laptop. So I'

Re: Skipstone, Galeon, in potato?

2001-01-22 Thread Pollywog
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 17:51:33 -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com said: > > Yeah. I'm running Woody on my desktop, thought I'd stick to Potato for > the laptop. So I've got Galeon and Skipstone on the desktop. Have to > say I like the idea more than the execution so far

Re: Skipstone, Galeon, in potato?

2001-01-22 Thread kmself
gt; > -- > > Karsten M. Self http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ > > What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal > > http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org > > > Hello Karsten, > > Both Ski

Re: Skipstone, Galeon, in potato?

2001-01-22 Thread Cyrus Patel
Hello Karsten, Both Skipstone and Galeon are under heavy development and I would recommend compiling them from sources. First get the sources - galeon is at galeon.sourceforge.net and skipstone is at muhri.net/skipstone. Install mozilla and mozilla-dev from potato and before compiling galeon

Skipstone, Galeon, in potato?

2001-01-22 Thread kmself
See subject. Any way to install one, the other, or both, under Potato? I don't find them listed with available packages. -- Karsten M. Self http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/

Re: Skipstone [was: Netscape 6.0]

2000-11-18 Thread Daniel Borgmann
On Saturday 18 November 2000 20:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > |> i heared of skipstone and really really want to try it. but > |> unfortunatly there is only a woody version :( is there any way to get > |> skipstone for a potato system? > > I have Skipstone running fine on

Re: Skipstone [was: Netscape 6.0]

2000-11-18 Thread mcclosk
|> i heared of skipstone and really really want to try it. but |> unfortunatly there is only a woody version :( is there any way to get |> skipstone for a potato system? I have Skipstone running fine on my potato system, and I really like it. I installed Mozilla from Debian (M18-3

Re: OT: gecko rendering engine and galeon/skipstone

2000-11-06 Thread Daniel Freedman
wrote: > Hello there, > > After all this discussion recently on the list about opera for linux and > galeon/skipstone, I looked at the galeon/skipstone webpages. So a question > came to my mind: > They both use the gecko rendering engine from Mozilla. They both need a > full

Re: OT: gecko rendering engine and galeon/skipstone

2000-11-06 Thread Florian Weimer
"Thomas J. Hamman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you want a small browser without relying on Mozilla's gecko, you > might want to try BrowseX (at www.browsex.com). > > As far as licenses go, it's free and open source, but I'm not sure if > it's Free (as in speech). The source code includes a

Re: OT: gecko rendering engine and galeon/skipstone

2000-11-06 Thread Thomas J. Hamman
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 10:54:01AM +0100, Daniel Reuter wrote: > Hello there, > > After all this discussion recently on the list about opera for linux and > galeon/skipstone, I looked at the galeon/skipstone webpages. So a question > came to my mind: > They both use the geck

Re: OT: gecko rendering engine and galeon/skipstone

2000-11-06 Thread Damien
> Why don't the developers of galeon/skipstone follow this approach? > Anybody knowing of a browser doing this? mozilla is still under heavy development. it's not practical to extract gecko right now. stay tuned, though ;o) cheers -- Damien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgptjKL

OT: gecko rendering engine and galeon/skipstone

2000-11-06 Thread Daniel Reuter
Hello there, After all this discussion recently on the list about opera for linux and galeon/skipstone, I looked at the galeon/skipstone webpages. So a question came to my mind: They both use the gecko rendering engine from Mozilla. They both need a full install of Mozilla on the machine to work

Re: Skipstone

2000-09-08 Thread Christopher S. Swingley
> I'm interested in trying out skipstone (an alternative to galeon that > is currently packaged in woody), but whenever I run it I get: > > ** CRITICAL **: file ../../../../../embedding/browser/gtk/src/ > gtkmozembed.cpp: line 298 (void gtk_moz_em

Skipstone

2000-09-08 Thread Christopher S. Swingley
Hi! I'm interested in trying out skipstone (an alternative to galeon that is currently packaged in woody), but whenever I run it I get: ** CRITICAL **: file ../../../../../embedding/browser/gtk/src/ gtkmozembed.cpp: line 298 (void gtk_moz_embed_init(GtkMoz