Re: Spam on Debian lists

2017-04-22 Thread Michael Fothergill
On 21 April 2017 at 03:11, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > On 4/20/17, Ben Finney wrote: > > Patrick Bartek writes: > > > >> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker > >> wrote: > >> > >> > fc: > >> >

Re: Spam on Debian lists

2017-04-21 Thread Dan Norton
On 04/20/2017 05:52 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote: On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker wrote: fc: Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list masters. But it's not

Re: Spam on Debian lists (was: Actually)

2017-04-21 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:52:39PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker > wrote: > > > fc: > > > > > > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? > > > > You

Re: Spam on Debian lists

2017-04-20 Thread Cindy-Sue Causey
On 4/20/17, Ben Finney wrote: > Patrick Bartek writes: > >> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker >> wrote: >> >> > fc: >> > > Why not just restrict it to people who have subscribed? >> > >> > Because this excludes use

Re: Spam on Debian lists

2017-04-20 Thread Ben Finney
Patrick Bartek writes: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker > wrote: > > > fc: > > > Why not just restrict it to people who have subscribed? > > > > Because this excludes use cases that are deemed valid by the list > > masters. > >

Re: Spam on Debian lists

2017-04-20 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Joel Rees writes: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker >> wrote: >> >>> fc: >>> > >>> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff?

Re: Spam on Debian lists

2017-04-20 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Patrick Bartek writes: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker > wrote: > >> fc: >> > >> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? >> >> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list >>

Re: Spam on Debian lists (was: Actually)

2017-04-20 Thread Joel Rees
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker > wrote: > >> fc: >> > >> > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? >> >> You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked

Re: Spam on Debian lists (was: Actually)

2017-04-20 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker wrote: > fc: > > > > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? > > You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list > masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all of the almost

Re: Spam on Debian lists (was: Actually)

2017-04-20 Thread Michael Fothergill
On 20 April 2017 at 21:40, Jochen Spieker wrote: > fc: > > > > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? > > You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list > masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all of the almost 300

Spam on Debian lists (was: Actually)

2017-04-20 Thread Jochen Spieker
fc: > > Actually -- does anyone monitor this list for this type of stuff? You have no idea *how much* spam is blocked by the work of the list masters. But it's not that anybody monitors all of the almost 300 Debian lists¹ with thousands of posts each day. > I see these types of things come

Spam on Debian lists

2010-12-13 Thread Andrei Popescu
Dear debian-user readers, Because Debian has a policy of open lists (posting allowed without subscribing) it may happen that the occasional spam will pass the *excellent* filters. In such cases, please: - do not reply to the spam message, it makes it impossible to clean the archives

Re: debian list security; mh question (was Re: spam on debian lists (Re : Program Submission))

1999-08-12 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* Samuel == Samuel R Scarano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Samuel 2) the fact that no '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is subscribed to Samuel the list? You are not required to be subscribe to post to the list. It is more trouble than it is worth - I am on three such lists. Ciao, Martin

spam on debian lists (Re: Program Submission)

1999-08-11 Thread sam
What's the deal with spam? I mean, on the mailing list signup page, there's a message about an automatic $1000 fee for spam; does SPI ever actually collect on this? In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: [blah,blah,blah] as it is not our intention to spam but to let individuals know about

debian list security; mh question (was Re: spam on debian lists (Re : Program Submission))

1999-08-11 Thread Samuel R. Scarano
Oops -- that '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' was me (Samuel Scarano) -- there's no such thing as tumbolia.debian.org -- I'm surprised the list server accepted that! What happened was, I sent the message using mh (from my laptop, which is (and was) connected via the t1 we have at my job), which tries to send

Re: spam on debian lists (Re: Program Submission)

1999-08-11 Thread Michelle Konzack
I France it will be no problem, Everybody know the price for spaming ist 1000 UD$ and if I send him a Lawer, he has no chance and MUST pay. I think, Debian MUST do that TOO Webmistress Michelle Michelle's Internet Service Strasbourg - France At 02:24 17.06.1999 -0300, you wrote