On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:51:04AM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
| > > * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 16:52]:
| > > > For performance reasons, I also have in /etc/security/limits:
| > > >
| > > > mailhardnproc 30
| > > >
| > > > ...to avoid runaway condit
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 06:06:52PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:51:26AM -0800, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 19:46]:
> > > on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:44:04PM -0800, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
on Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:51:26AM -0800, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 19:46]:
> > on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:44:04PM -0800, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 16:52]:
> > > > For per
* Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 19:46]:
> on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:44:04PM -0800, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 16:52]:
> > > For performance reasons, I also have in /etc/security/limits:
> > >
> > > mailha
on Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:09:38AM -0500, stan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:51:49PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > I'd recommend running spamc, using spamassassin in client/server mode.
> > This cuts the rougly one-second overhead per message of spamassasin's
> > star
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:51:49PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:47:39AM -0500, stan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 07:19:18AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > > on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:12:05AM -0500, stan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > I
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:24:54AM +, W. Citoan wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:12:05 -0500, stan wrote:
> > I'm setting up Spamassain, and I can't seem to find out how to create
> > a whitelist for it.
> >
> > I will be retrieving my mail using fetchmail, then pasing it to
> > procmail, wh
on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:44:04PM -0800, Vineet Kumar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 16:52]:
> > For performance reasons, I also have in /etc/security/limits:
> >
> > mailhardnproc 30
> >
> > ...to avoid runaway conditions
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 10:12:05 -0500, stan wrote:
> I'm setting up Spamassain, and I can't seem to find out how to create
> a whitelist for it.
>
> I will be retrieving my mail using fetchmail, then pasing it to
> procmail, which will call somassain. If it matters my MUA of choice
> is mutt.
Si
* Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031208 16:52]:
> For performance reasons, I also have in /etc/security/limits:
>
> mailhardnproc 30
>
> ...to avoid runaway conditions when large mail loads hit. Mail
> processing will be limited to a max of 30 processes (gener
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:57:12PM +0100, Mark Schouten wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 03:04:04PM -0500, stan wrote:
> > Teo, I gad read that. What I don't understand is how to use that when the
> > mail messages in question are alreay stored in a mail folder. Or how to
> > just manually add (for
on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:47:39AM -0500, stan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 07:19:18AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:12:05AM -0500, stan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I'm setting up Spamassain, and I can't seem to find out how to create a
>
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 03:04:04PM -0500, stan wrote:
> Teo, I gad read that. What I don't understand is how to use that when the
> mail messages in question are alreay stored in a mail folder. Or how to
> just manually add (for instance) friends that I don't happen to have a
> sample email laying
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 08:43:48PM +0100, Mark Schouten wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:09:43PM -0500, stan wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:17:21PM +0100, Mark Schouten wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:12:05AM -0500, stan wrote:
> > > > I'm setting up Spamassain, and I can't seem t
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:09:43PM -0500, stan wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:17:21PM +0100, Mark Schouten wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:12:05AM -0500, stan wrote:
> > > I'm setting up Spamassain, and I can't seem to find out how to create a
> > > whitelist for it.
> > >
> > > I will
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:17:21PM +0100, Mark Schouten wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:12:05AM -0500, stan wrote:
> > I'm setting up Spamassain, and I can't seem to find out how to create a
> > whitelist for it.
> >
> > I will be retrieving my mail using fetchmail, then pasing it to procmail,
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:12:05AM -0500, stan wrote:
> I'm setting up Spamassain, and I can't seem to find out how to create a
> whitelist for it.
>
> I will be retrieving my mail using fetchmail, then pasing it to procmail,
> which will call somassain. If it matters my MUA of choice is mutt.
ht
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 07:19:18AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:12:05AM -0500, stan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I'm setting up Spamassain, and I can't seem to find out how to create a
> > whitelist for it.
>
> If you enable auto-whitelisting, you don't have to do a
on Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 10:12:05AM -0500, stan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm setting up Spamassain, and I can't seem to find out how to create a
> whitelist for it.
If you enable auto-whitelisting, you don't have to do anything.
Otherwise, man spamassassin will give you what you're looking for
I'm setting up Spamassain, and I can't seem to find out how to create a
whitelist for it.
I will be retrieving my mail using fetchmail, then pasing it to procmail,
which will call somassain. If it matters my MUA of choice is mutt.
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safet
20 matches
Mail list logo
