On 2013-07-07, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
google-chrome-stable : Depends: gconf-service but it is not installable
Depends: libgconf-2-4 (>= 2.31.1) but it is
not installable
Depends: libgdk-pixb
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 02:21:53PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Resending to list. where it ought to have been in the first place.
>
> On Sunday 07 July 2013 06:43:28 Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
> > Dear List -
> >
> > This is what I tried next
> >
> > 1. Open a terminal window.
> >
> > 2. Type in t
On 2013-07-07, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
>
> I have installed version 6 on my laptop. Without changing the
> installation, which version of Google-Chrome should I install?
Well, running Squeeze, I have:
Architecture: amd64
Version: 27.0.1453.110-r202711
which probably represents the last up
On 2013-07-07, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
google-chrome-stable : Depends: gconf-service but it is not installable
Depends: libgconf-2-4 (>= 2.31.1) but it is
not installable
Depends: libgdk-pixb
On 2013-07-07, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> google-chrome-stable : Depends: gconf-service but it is not installable
> Depends: libgconf-2-4 (>= 2.31.1) but it is
> not installable
> Depends: lib
Resending to list. where it ought to have been in the first place.
On Sunday 07 July 2013 06:43:28 Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
> Dear List -
>
> This is what I tried next
>
> 1. Open a terminal window.
>
> 2. Type in the following commands then hit Enter after each.
>
> For 32-bit systems:
>
> wge
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 01:13:07AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 07 July 2013 00:31:41 Charlie wrote:
> > On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 22:36:59 +0100 "Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com"
> > sent this:
> >
> > >On Saturday 06 July 2013 22:24:34 Stephen Allen wrote:
> > >> I have it working here
Dear List -
This is what I tried next
1. Open a terminal window.
2. Type in the following commands then hit Enter after each.
For 32-bit systems:
wget -c
https://dl.google.com/linux/direct/google-chrome-stable_current_i386.deb
dpkg -i google-chrome-*.deb
apt-get install -f
These are the
Dear List -
These are the errors I get on the dpkg install.
-
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
google-chrome-stable : Depends: gconf-service but it is not installable
Depends: libgconf-2-4 (>= 2.31.1) but it is
not installable
On Friday 05 July 2013 18:03:01 Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
locate google-chrome | less --- gives no results. [except the files in
the Downloads directory].
Are you changing into the directory where you have placed the .deb
before typing the command? Otherwise you need to give the whole path
On Sunday 07 July 2013 00:31:41 Charlie wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 22:36:59 +0100 "Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com"
> sent this:
>
> >On Saturday 06 July 2013 22:24:34 Stephen Allen wrote:
> >> I have it working here fine on Debian's Chromium.
> >
> >Does it matter?
> >
> >Lisi
>
> I thi
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 10:36:59PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 06 July 2013 22:24:34 Stephen Allen wrote:
> > I have it working here fine on Debian's Chromium.
>
> Does it matter?
>
> Lisi
>
---end quoted text---
Well, apparently it does, you posted asking.
--
Cheers,
Stephen, Toro
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013 22:36:59 +0100 "Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com"
sent this:
>On Saturday 06 July 2013 22:24:34 Stephen Allen wrote:
>> I have it working here fine on Debian's Chromium.
>
>Does it matter?
>
>Lisi
>
I think it must Lisi, because someone posted about a problem with Chro
On Saturday 06 July 2013 22:24:34 Stephen Allen wrote:
> I have it working here fine on Debian's Chromium.
Does it matter?
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 07:53:15AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 06 July 2013 01:23:54 green wrote:
> > chromium does not include flash, which is non-free and available via
> > the flashplugin-nonfree package.
>
> Yes, but I couldn't get it to work with Chromium.
>
> Lisi
>
---end quote
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 12:14:20PM -0400, Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
> I'm not sure that this ever got to the list, so I am resending.
>
> Dear list -
>
> I apologize for having to revisit this, but I can't get it to work,
> which I cannot understand. I followed the instruc
On Saturday 06 July 2013 01:23:54 green wrote:
> chromium does not include flash, which is non-free and available via
> the flashplugin-nonfree package.
Yes, but I couldn't get it to work with Chromium.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> It isn't actually identical...
*Nearly* identical.
> At least, I couldn't get it to update. Google Chrome does update
> flash automatically...
The absence of "automatic updates" is a feature, not a bug. Why would
you want Google deciding when and how to alter the software o
Lisi Reisz wrote at 2013-07-05 17:24 -0500:
> On Friday 05 July 2013 22:41:15 green wrote:
> > Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote at 2013-07-05 11:14 -0500:
> > > dpkg -i google-chrome-stable_current_i386.deb
> >
> > You have a reason for not using the [nearly identical] "chromium" in
> > Debian main?
>
>
Reposting to the list, where it ought to have gone in the first place. Sorry,
Ethan.
On Friday 05 July 2013 17:14:20 Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
> > I apologize for having to revisit this, but I can't get it to work,
> > which I cannot understand. I followed the instructions I used
> > previou
On Friday 05 July 2013 22:41:15 green wrote:
> Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote at 2013-07-05 11:14 -0500:
> > dpkg -i google-chrome-stable_current_i386.deb
>
> You have a reason for not using the [nearly identical] "chromium" in
> Debian main?
It isn't actually identical, and flash does not work proper
Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote at 2013-07-05 11:14 -0500:
> dpkg -i google-chrome-stable_current_i386.deb
You have a reason for not using the [nearly identical] "chromium" in
Debian main?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Friday 05 July 2013 17:14:20 Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
I'm not sure that this ever got to the list, so I am resending.
Dear list -
I apologize for having to revisit this, but I can't get it to work,
which I cannot understand. I followed the instructions I used
previously,
On Friday 05 July 2013 17:14:20 Ethan Rosenberg, PhD wrote:
> I'm not sure that this ever got to the list, so I am resending.
>
> Dear list -
>
> I apologize for having to revisit this, but I can't get it to work,
> which I cannot understand. I followed the instructions I used
> p
I'm not sure that this ever got to the list, so I am resending.
Dear list -
I apologize for having to revisit this, but I can't get it to work,
which I cannot understand. I followed the instructions I used
previously, and no luck.
Download from Google.
cd /home/ethan/Downlo
25 matches
Mail list logo