> From: "Karsten M. Self"
> ...
> Biggest browser beefs:
>
> - Stability. Quit with the fucking crashing already. Don't lose my
> stuff (this includes state). ***STABILITY IS NOT OPTIONAL***
>
> - Speed. Render. Quickly. Load. Quickly. Stop. Quickly. Ties
> strongl
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:34:31AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> I've never used IE.
Really? So how would you support your previous statement,
> > I also would like to have a decent browser that doesn't attempt to
> > copy IE.
if you had no experience with it. How exactly would Mozilla be
imita
HS> Or, in my experience, and I stand behind saying this, I'd like a
HS> browser for linux that *works* as good as IE... I am *not* pro-MS
HS> either.
konqueror is very good. mozilla is good too if you have a lot of RAM
:). Actually I thing both of them have better rendering engine then
IE.
--
on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:25:56PM -0500, Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> * Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com) [010507 19:22]:
> > >
> > > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here:
> > > http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's
> > >
* Karsten M. Self (kmself@ix.netcom.com) [010507 19:22]:
> >
> > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here:
> > http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's
> > quite nice...
>
> A GNOME environment is not required for galeon, though some gnome libs
> ar
on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 06:16:19PM -0500, Rich Puhek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
> >
> > Biggest browser beefs:
> >
> > - Stability. Quit with the fucking crashing already. Don't lose my
> > stuff (this includes state). ***STABILITY IS NOT OPTIONAL***
> >
>
"Karsten M. Self" wrote:
>
> Biggest browser beefs:
>
> - Stability. Quit with the fucking crashing already. Don't lose my
> stuff (this includes state). ***STABILITY IS NOT OPTIONAL***
>
> - Speed. Render. Quickly. Load. Quickly. Stop. Quickly. Ties
> strongly to l
on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:54:39AM -0400, Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> >> Note, however, if you're shifting to the dailies, that the 0.9x
> >> series is rumored to be less stable than the 0.8x line.
> >
> > N
> >
> > /me sobs
> >
> >
> > why don't they just throw away that
> > Or, in my experience, and I stand behind saying this, I'd like a
> > browser for linux that *works* as good as IE... I am *not*
pro-MS
> > either.
>
> I've been running Opera 5.0b8 here and it works just fine.
> Netscape crashed all the time, even under Windows. Mozilla
> is getting close, but
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:36:53AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> > I tried it. I found it neither more stable nor faster than
Navigator
> > (though with a 28.8 connection browser speed is not a problem
> > anyway).
>
> I can't believe that. Opera loads about 5 times faster than
Navigator
> here, a
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:36:53AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> I tried it. I found it neither more stable nor faster than Navigator
> (though with a 28.8 connection browser speed is not a problem anyway).
I can't believe that. Opera loads about 5 times faster than Navigator here,
and is very quic
On Mon, 07 May 2001 08:37:03 Hall Stevenson wrote:
> > Hall writes:
> > > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ??
> >
> > Because it depends on _all_ of Mozilla?
>
> I don't know exactly how it works, but the original complaint had
to
> do with the XUL interface and the add-ons (mail, news,
Martin writes:
> the i suggest trying opera. it's quite stable and very fast.
I tried it. I found it neither more stable nor faster than Navigator
(though with a 28.8 connection browser speed is not a problem anyway).
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Hall Stevenson writes:
> I don't know exactly how it works, but the original complaint had to do
> with the XUL interface and the add-ons (mail, news, irc, etc). Galeon
> doesn't have all this.
A complaint I share.
> It uses "gnome" for the interface and is only a web browser.
But I still have
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 02:20:24PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/05/2001 (14:02) :
> > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here:
> > http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's
> > quite nice...
I am using
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:51:16AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> I found it less stable than Netscape 4.75, which crashes several times a
> day.
>
> I also would like to have a decent browser that doesn't attempt to copy IE.
the i suggest trying opera. it's quite stable and very fast. well, it's no
> Hall writes:
> > If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ??
>
> Because it depends on _all_ of Mozilla?
I don't know exactly how it works, but the original complaint had to
do with the XUL interface and the add-ons (mail, news, irc, etc).
Galeon doesn't have all this. It uses "gnome" for the
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:54:39AM -0400, Hall Stevenson wrote:
>
> If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here:
> http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's
> quite nice...
galeon indeed works very well. the problem is a mozilla bug is still
a galeon b
Hall writes:
> If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ??
Because it depends on _all_ of Mozilla?
> I've used it in the past and it's quite nice...
I found it less stable than Netscape 4.75, which crashes several times a
day.
I also would like to have a decent browser that doesn't attempt to
Hall Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/05/2001 (14:02) :
> If you're a gnome user, why not try galeon ?? It's site is here:
> http://galeon.sourceforge.net/. I've used it in the past and it's
> quite nice...
Do you know where one can get the Debian pacakges? The download link on
that page
>> Note, however, if you're shifting to the dailies, that the 0.9x
>> series is rumored to be less stable than the 0.8x line.
>
> N
>
> /me sobs
>
>
> why don't they just throw away that entire XUL, irc, news, mail,
> whatever-other-useless-cruft and concentrate on the rendering
> engine,
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 10:15:03PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> Note, however, if you're shifting to the dailies, that the 0.9x series
> is rumored to be less stable than the 0.8x line.
N
/me sobs
why don't they just throw away that entire XUL, irc, news, mail,
whatever-other-usel
on Sun, May 06, 2001 at 09:00:57PM -0800, Ethan Benson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 06:03:10PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > Is there a way to get mozilla on woody to do strong encryption? The
> > docs refer to the personal security manager, but the file no longer
> > exis
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 06:03:10PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Is there a way to get mozilla on woody to do strong encryption? The
> docs refer to the personal security manager, but the file no longer
> exists. Mozilla's site says the security is now incorporated into the
> nightly build.
>
> Si
Is there a way to get mozilla on woody to do strong encryption? The
docs refer to the personal security manager, but the file no longer
exists. Mozilla's site says the security is now incorporated into the
nightly build.
Since that build seems not to have made it to woody, I still need to
do som
25 matches
Mail list logo
