Top 7 Programming Languages That Employers Really Want

Subject: Top 7 Programming Languages That Employers Really Want Good day from Singapore, Article: Top 7 Programming Languages That Employers Really Want Author: Nick Kolakowski Date Published: 14 October 2019 Link: https://insights.dice.com/2019/10/14/7-programming-languages-employers-want

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

l 19/9/19, Felix Perez escribió: > > El mié., 18 de sep. de 2019 a la(s) 16:38, juan > > (juansanti...@riseup.net) escribió: > >> > >> > >> El 18/9/19 a las 18:10, Felix Perez escribió: > >> > El mié., 21 de ago. de 2019 a la(s) 13:55, juan > >

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

El mié., 18 de sep. de 2019 a la(s) 16:38, juan (juansanti...@riseup.net) escribió: > > > El 18/9/19 a las 18:10, Felix Perez escribió: > > El mié., 21 de ago. de 2019 a la(s) 13:55, juan > > (juansanti...@riseup.net) escribió: > >> No sabía que en esta lista hay un

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

El 18/9/19 a las 18:10, Felix Perez escribió: El mié., 21 de ago. de 2019 a la(s) 13:55, juan (juansanti...@riseup.net) escribió: No sabía que en esta lista hay un regla anti top-postng por eso lo hacía siempre, para mi es la forma natural de responder para mi es muy fácil seguir un hilo si

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

cesibilidad. > Tal y como cuando un usuario señala que se le envía copia al privado, el usuario podría solicitar que se le conteste con top posting. Saludos. > Yo, personalmente, soy editor de la Wiki Debian; tengo los permisos > necesarios; cosa que no es difícil de hacer, pero tambi

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

El mié., 21 de ago. de 2019 a la(s) 13:55, juan (juansanti...@riseup.net) escribió: > > No sabía que en esta lista hay un regla anti top-postng por eso lo hacía > siempre, para mi es la forma natural de responder para mi es muy fácil seguir > un hilo si se que tengo que hacerlo de ab

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

uesto, este otro párrafo: """ - If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just enough text of the original to give a context. This will make sure readers understand when they

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

, aunque así lo parece en realidad Debian como muchos otros proyectos de software libre es una *meritocracia*. > > Siguiendo esta línea de razonamiento pongo sobre la mesa la siguiente > discusión: > > La regla de Top Posting y Bottom-Posting fue establecida en un tiempo en que >

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

construir lenguaje influyente usando solo trucos de redacción y buscando > sinónimos inclusivos que si no incluimos todos los generos pero > excluimos a los ciegos, mal negocio, un día un ciego va a tirar su > computadora por la ventana de tanta @, x, etc > |

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

El jue., 22 ago. 2019 a las 6:17, Debian () escribió: > Sí. > Nosotros, los propios usuarios, con un acuerdo, podemos modificar las > normas. > Son normas de convivencia, no leyes escritas en piedra bajadas desde lo > alto. > > Lo que habla Fran, invidente, es algo que debe incorporarse en las >

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

Sí. Nosotros, los propios usuarios, con un acuerdo, podemos modificar las normas. Son normas de convivencia, no leyes escritas en piedra bajadas desde lo alto. Lo que habla Fran, invidente, es algo que debe incorporarse en las normas. No se me había pasado siquiera por la mente. Podemos

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

:50, Fran Torres escribió: > > Buenas, > > yo siempre suelo hacer incapié en la accesibilidad (como usuario > invidente de debian). De hecho, si no me equivoco, en la lista > debian-accessibility (también estoy en ella) se utiliza mucho el > top-posting. Por qué? > Por que

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

la lista debian-accessibility (también estoy en ella) se utiliza mucho el top-posting. Por qué? Por que con lectores de pantalla, es mucho más sencillo, rápido y eficiente, leer la última respuesta como la primera. la penúltima como la segunda y así sucesivamente. Es decir, top-posting. A demás, si

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

Buenas, yo siempre suelo hacer incapié en la accesibilidad (como usuario invidente de debian). De hecho, si no me equivoco, en la lista debian-accessibility (también estoy en ella) se utiliza mucho el top-posting. Por qué? Por que con lectores de pantalla, es mucho más sencillo, rápido y

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

El 21/8/19 a las 14:55, juan escribió: |No sabía que en esta lista hay un regla anti top-postng por eso lo hacía siempre, para mi es la forma natural de responder para mi es muy fácil seguir un hilo si se que tengo que hacerlo de abajo a arriba, pero lo más importante es que nos pongamos de

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

|No sabía que en esta lista hay un regla anti top-postng por eso lo hacía siempre, para mi es la forma natural de responder para mi es muy fácil seguir un hilo si se que tengo que hacerlo de abajo a arriba, pero lo más importante es que nos pongamos de acuerdo, ya que el verdadero desbarajuste

Re: OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

Top Posting y Bottom-Posting fue establecida en un tiempo en que la mayoría de los usuarios Debian usábamos clientes sólo texto por su versatilidad, rapidez y muchas otras cosas que en su tiempo superaban a cualquier cliente gráfico. Sin embargo a más de una década desde entonces, además del

OT Top-posting y Bottom Posting

mayor base tecnológica de nuestros tiempos, se ha convertido en un ejemplo de lo que una organización democrática bien organizada puede lograr. Siguiendo esta línea de razonamiento pongo sobre la mesa la siguiente discusión: La regla de Top Posting y Bottom-Posting fue establecida en un tiempo en

Re: (OT) Top Posting (was Re: Gimp Babl too old)

Kenneth Parker writes: > I have a special issue: Using Gmail on a Phone or Tablet (I have > both). Both of those devices lack a proper keyboard. That makes them unsuitable for composing anything but very short messages, and wholly unsuitable for editing text. > Seriously, how do others of you

Re: (OT) Top Posting (was Re: Gimp Babl too old)

computer. Using an inferior tool is no excuse to inconvenience others. My pet peeve here is when people try to use the Stack Exchange app or whatever, and excuse the lousy formatting on "I'm on the phone", but thanks for pointing out another one: gmail top posting! It's bad enough in an a

(OT) Top Posting (was Re: Gimp Babl too old)

On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ric Moore wrote: > > > > Same reason some people top post. They just ignore the conventions. > I have a special issue: Using Gmail on a Phone or Tablet (I have both). I have yet to find a Straightforward way to Snip lots of lines, using

Re: RAM G.Skill défecteuse et garantie pas top

Bonjour, Racheter 16Go "homogènes" d'un coup et revendre les "vieux" 8Go sur un site d'annonces quand ils reviennent du SAV, surtout s'il y a eu échange et donc pas de risque de décevoir un acheteur ? Le 03/04/2018 à 20:32, Jean-Marc a écrit : Entre parenthèse, ça donne envie d'ajouter de

Re: RAM G.Skill défecteuse et garantie pas top

Le 03/04/2018 à 20:32, Jean-Marc a écrit : > salut la liste, > > J'ai une de mes deux barres de RAM qui vient de me lâcher. > > Pas super top mais rien de dramatique non plus. > > Sauf que pour remplacer cette RAM G.Skill, le service de garantie me demande > de ren

Re: RAM G.Skill défecteuse et garantie pas top

On 04/03/2018 08:32 PM, Jean-Marc wrote: salut la liste, J'ai une de mes deux barres de RAM qui vient de me lâcher. Je n'ai jamais vécu ça (mais j'ai déjà eu des RAM de portables subrepticement defectueuses ;;; :-( Pas super top mais rien de dramatique non plus. Sauf que pour remplacer

RAM G.Skill défecteuse et garantie pas top

salut la liste, J'ai une de mes deux barres de RAM qui vient de me lâcher. Pas super top mais rien de dramatique non plus. Sauf que pour remplacer cette RAM G.Skill, le service de garantie me demande de rentrer les 2 RAM. Sous prétexte qu'il faut tester le kit de 2x8GB parce que, dixit

Re: top that shows "Web Content" (was Re: Recommended editor for novice programmers?)

I found out what it was. I guess I haven't looked at top since something like August 21, thus hadn't noticed the change--not looking at top in that time is a good thing, because it implies I had no problems that made me look at top ;-) > I believe the ESR release channel gained > the multiproc

Re: top that shows "Web Content" (was Re: Recommended editor for novice programmers?)

> Meanwhile, I have firefox open on the results of a google search. > > > > That's currently reading > > > > firefox-esr 31% + Web Content 28% > > > > > > Hmm, do you have a version of top (or something else) which reports the > > > use of memor

Re: top that shows "Web Content" (was Re: Recommended editor for novice programmers?)

t; That's currently reading > > > firefox-esr 31% + Web Content 28% > > > > Hmm, do you have a version of top (or something else) which reports the > > use of memory for web content? I don't see that in top on Wheezy., but > > I'd like to get that

Re: top that shows "Web Content" (was Re: Recommended editor for novice programmers?)

Hmm, do you have a version of top (or something else) which reports the use > of > memory for web content? I don't see that in top on Wheezy., but I'd like to > get that number. I don't have any browsers on my wheezy systems, but is it possible that wheezy calls it plugin-container

top that shows "Web Content" (was Re: Recommended editor for novice programmers?)

On Friday, September 08, 2017 05:13:31 PM David Wright wrote: > Meanwhile, I have firefox open on the results of a google search. > That's currently reading > firefox-esr 31% + Web Content 28% Hmm, do you have a version of top (or something else) which reports the use of memory for we

Re: Segmentation fault in top -b1 -hc

On 2017-05-09, Bob McGowan <ramjr0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I just tried the OP's command line and got the following error: > > $ top -b1 -hc > procps-ng 3.3.12 > Usage: > top -hv | -bcHiOSs -d secs -n max -u|U user -p pid(s) -o field -w [cols] > >

Re: Segmentation fault in top -b1 -hc

On 05/08/2017 03:28 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:46:13AM +0200, Peter Ludikovsky wrote: > > On 05/08/2017 11:19 AM, Valentin Bajrami wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> There is a segmentation fault when top is used as follow > >>

Re: Segmentation fault in top -b1 -hc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:46:13AM +0200, Peter Ludikovsky wrote: > On 05/08/2017 11:19 AM, Valentin Bajrami wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There is a segmentation fault when top is used as follow > > > > top -b1 -hc > &g

Re: Segmentation fault in top -b1 -hc

On 05/08/2017 11:19 AM, Valentin Bajrami wrote: > Hi, > > There is a segmentation fault when top is used as follow > > top -b1 -hc > > I think the args are not parsed properly. The version used is: > procps-ng version 3.3.10 > > -- > Met vriendelijke groe

Segmentation fault in top -b1 -hc

Hi, There is a segmentation fault when top is used as follow top -b1 -hc I think the args are not parsed properly. The version used is: procps-ng version 3.3.10 -- Met vriendelijke groet, Valentin Bajrami

Re: Problem with Mate's Top Panel

On 02/11/2017 08:21 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote: On 2017-02-11, Curt wrote: On 2017-02-11, Richard Owlett wrote: [...] I now have only the "Main Menu" icon. It has Applications, Places, and System as submenus. I wish to return to the original configuration.

Re: Problem with Mate's Top Panel

On 02/11/2017 09:47 AM, Curt wrote: On 2017-02-11, Liam O'Toole wrote: On 2017-02-11, Curt wrote: On 2017-02-11, Richard Owlett wrote: [...] I now have only the "Main Menu" icon. It has Applications, Places, and System as

Re: RESOLVED - was [Re: Problem with Mate's Top Panel]

TEinfo/recoveringTheTopPanel_ofTheMATEdesktop_forLinuxMintMATEusers.htm > > . > The lack of clarity is illustrated in an image at top right of page. > > Thank you. y.w. songbird

RESOLVED - was [Re: Problem with Mate's Top Panel]

On 02/11/2017 08:10 AM, songbird wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: After a default installation of Mate under Jessie there had been one icon and three text labels on the left end of the top panel. The icon was the same icon associated with "Main Menu" in "Add to Panel". The th

Re: Problem with Mate's Top Panel

On 2017-02-11, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2017-02-11, Curt wrote: >> On 2017-02-11, Richard Owlett wrote: > > [...] > >>> I now have only the "Main Menu" icon. It has Applications, Places, >>> and System as submenus. I wish to return to

Re: Problem with Mate's Top Panel

On 02/11/2017 07:44 AM, Curt wrote: On 2017-02-11, Richard Owlett <rowl...@cloud85.net> wrote: After a default installation of Mate under Jessie there had been one icon and three text labels on the left end of the top panel. The icon was the same icon associated with "Main Me

Re: Problem with Mate's Top Panel

On 2017-02-11, Curt wrote: > On 2017-02-11, Richard Owlett wrote: [...] >> I now have only the "Main Menu" icon. It has Applications, Places, >> and System as submenus. I wish to return to the original >> configuration. How? > > Reinstall for the umpteenth

Re: Problem with Mate's Top Panel

Richard Owlett wrote: > After a default installation of Mate under Jessie there had been one icon and > three text labels on the left end of the top panel. > The icon was the same icon associated with "Main Menu" in "Add to Panel". > The three text labels were

Re: Problem with Mate's Top Panel

On 2017-02-11, Richard Owlett <rowl...@cloud85.net> wrote: > After a default installation of Mate under Jessie there had been one icon and > three text labels on the left end of the top panel. > The icon was the same icon associated with "Main Menu" in "Add to Panel&

Problem with Mate's Top Panel

After a default installation of Mate under Jessie there had been one icon and three text labels on the left end of the top panel. The icon was the same icon associated with "Main Menu" in "Add to Panel". The three text labels were Applications, Places, and System.

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

gt; > > Auto-selecting FAT32 for large filesystem ...and overlooked this: > > > # mkfs.fat -F 16 -i 20161231 -n PETROLEUM2G -r 2000 -v /dev/sdb1 > > This was intended to create a FAT16 filesystem... you are right. [...] > > This is very interesting! Seems FAT32 has a limit

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

, January 02, 2017 10:29:16 AM Nicolas George wrote: > Le tridi 13 nivôse, an CCXXV, Jude DaShiell a écrit : > > msdos 6.22 which was fat16 had a limit of 112 files in top level > > directory. Once I tried putting more than that on a floppy disk and > > couldn't figure why no m

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

Le tridi 13 nivôse, an CCXXV, Jude DaShiell a écrit : > msdos 6.22 which was fat16 had a limit of 112 files in top level directory. > Once I tried putting more than that on a floppy disk and couldn't figure why > no more would fit until I found this out. I don't know if the limit got &

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

msdos 6.22 which was fat16 had a limit of 112 files in top level directory. Once I tried putting more than that on a floppy disk and couldn't figure why no more would fit until I found this out. I don't know if the limit got expanded for fat32 and msdos 7 but since Microsoft has been devoted

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

using 0xf8 media descriptor, with 3891199 sectors; > > drive number 0x80; > > filesystem has 2 32-bit FATs and 8 sectors per cluster. > > FAT size is 3793 sectors, and provides 485447 clusters. > > There are 32 reserved sectors. > > Volume ID is 20161231, volume label

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

provides 485447 clusters. > There are 32 reserved sectors. > Volume ID is 20161231, volume label PETROLEUM2G. > # > > I now ran your one-liner and created over 20,000 empty files > at top level. So I down-sized with: > > # mkfs.fat -F 16 -i 20161231 -n PETROLEUM2G -r

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

ice" (that's ENOSPC if I remember correctly). The "device" has still reams of space left: tomas@rasputin:~$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on [...] /dev/loop0 238K 0 238K 0% /mnt So 256 must be a limit on number of entrie

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

evice" has still > reams of space left: > > tomas@rasputin:~$ df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > [...] > /dev/loop0 238K 0 238K 0% /mnt > > So 256 must be a limit on number of entries on the top level

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

On Saturday 31 December 2016 09:16:10 Richard Owlett wrote: > On 12/31/2016 7:49 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Saturday 31 December 2016 08:01:15 Nicolas George wrote: > >> Le primidi 11 nivôse, an CCXXV, Gene Heskett a écrit : > >>> From personal experience decades ago, on a dos3.2 system,

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

Le primidi 11 nivôse, an CCXXV, Gene Heskett a écrit : > > Think a little more about it: it is a limitation of the format, not > > the operating system. If an operating system extends the format, it is > > no longer compatible with the rest of the world, and then there is no > > reason to use FAT

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 02:01:15PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote: > Le primidi 11 nivôse, an CCXXV, Gene Heskett a écrit : > > From personal experience decades ago, on a dos3.2 system, this is > > correct. But I can't testify about the newer, or the

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

On 12/31/2016 7:49 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: On Saturday 31 December 2016 08:01:15 Nicolas George wrote: Le primidi 11 nivôse, an CCXXV, Gene Heskett a écrit : From personal experience decades ago, on a dos3.2 system, this is correct. But I can't testify about the newer, or the now several

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

On Saturday 31 December 2016 08:01:15 Nicolas George wrote: > Le primidi 11 nivôse, an CCXXV, Gene Heskett a écrit : > > From personal experience decades ago, on a dos3.2 system, this is > > correct. But I can't testify about the newer, or the now several > > non-M$ versions of dos. I saw an

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

Le primidi 11 nivôse, an CCXXV, Gene Heskett a écrit : > From personal experience decades ago, on a dos3.2 system, this is > correct. But I can't testify about the newer, or the now several non-M$ > versions of dos. I saw an announcement of yet another dos release just a > couple weeks back. I

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

still > reams of space left: > > tomas@rasputin:~$ df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > [...] > /dev/loop0 238K 0 238K 0% /mnt > > So 256 must be a limit on number of entries on the top level dir

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

quot; ; done The loop starts failing at i == 257 with "no space left on device" (that's ENOSPC if I remember correctly). The "device" has still reams of space left: tomas@rasputin:~$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on [...] /dev/loop0

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

do...@mail.com schreef op 26-12-2016 3:41: I encountered this many times on windowz FAT32 in a non-root dir, but never on Linux. I suspect that it was/is one of their "Features". The said "Feature" still was there when using ntfs in XP if I remember correctly. Perhaps it's just because

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:46:25 +0100 Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > > As I recall that there is (or used to be?) a limit on the number of > > files in the > > top level directory of a FAT32 (or 16?) partition / drive. If you > > needed to > > hav

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level directory

the root directory region > could be changed at filesystem creation time (within some limits). > OTOH, when you use VFAT on top, it can consume more than one "directory > entry" per file... > > So you never know for sure with FAT12/16/32 + VFAT ;-) > > Here: >

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level directory

uot;it depends" on the implementation, but it is not unlimited. Even for FAT12/16, the number of entries in the root directory region could be changed at filesystem creation time (within some limits). OTOH, when you use VFAT on top, it can consume more than one "directory entry" per file..

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level directory

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 07:42:33 -0500 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: >I've been googling to try to answer this question, so far, no luck. > >I recall that there is (or used to be?) a limit on the number of files in the >top level director

Re: OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level directory

L'octidi 18 frimaire, an CCXXV, rhkra...@gmail.com a écrit : > I recall that there is (or used to be?) a limit on the number of files in the > top level directory of a FAT32 (or 16?) partition / drive. If you needed to > have more files in a directory, you had to create a sub

OT?: FAT32(/16?) Question: Max. files in top level directory

I've been googling to try to answer this question, so far, no luck. I recall that there is (or used to be?) a limit on the number of files in the top level directory of a FAT32 (or 16?) partition / drive. If you needed to have more files in a directory, you had to create a subdirectory

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 07:07:03AM +, Curt wrote: > On 2016-05-29, Stephen Allen <marathon.duran...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 03:16:50PM +0200, Hársfalvi Gábor wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> Is there any way to move the clock on th

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Friday 27 May 2016 14:24:31 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Friday 27 May 2016 14:16:50 Hársfalvi Gábor wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Is there any way to move the clock on the bar top on the screen? For > > example from center to left side. > > What desktop?? Or is it a wi

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On 2016-05-29, Stephen Allen <marathon.duran...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 03:16:50PM +0200, Hársfalvi Gábor wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Is there any way to move the clock on the bar top on the screen? For example >> from center to left sid

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 03:16:50PM +0200, Hársfalvi Gábor wrote: > Hi! > > Is there any way to move the clock on the bar top on the screen? For example > from center to left side. > > Thanks. If you look on extensions.gnome.org you might find an extension to do this. I'm not

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 15:16 +0200, Hársfalvi Gábor wrote: > Hi! > > Is there any way to move the clock on the bar top on the screen? For  > example from center to left side. You need to use extensions for that https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/2/move-clock/ -- Cheers, Sven Ar

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Friday 27 May 2016 14:24:31 Lisi Reisz wrote: > In TDE 3.5.13.2 on Wheezy, and TDE 14.0.4 on Jessie, you click just to the > left of the clock applet to bring up a small window which offers, among > other things, to move the clock.  You choose "move the clock" and move it. Sorry, you RIGHT

Re: Gnome top bar clock

On Friday 27 May 2016 14:16:50 Hársfalvi Gábor wrote: > Hi! > > Is there any way to move the clock on the bar top on the screen? For > example from center to left side. What desktop?? Or is it a window manager? I seem to remember that you are running Gnome3 on Jessie, but you

Gnome top bar clock

Hi! Is there any way to move the clock on the bar top on the screen? For example from center to left side. Thanks.

Re: [OT] top-posting (was: unlisted mirrors & non-gui installation)

Hi. On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:31:27 -0300 Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI <ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:16:03 +0300 > Reco <recovery...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Please do not top post. And please do not send ht

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

2015-06-30 15:47 GMT+02:00 steve dl...@bluewin.ch: Salut, Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ? history | awk '{print $5} ; ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 Chez moi: 11849 mutt 4671 cd 2615 ls 1949 l 1465 vim 953 lrt 618 cat

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Le 01-07-2015, à 06:57:01 +0200, Grégory Bulot a écrit : Le Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:26:03 +0200, steve dl...@bluewin.ch a écrit : D'où vient ce $5 ? Chez moi, comme chez beaucoup d'autres je pense, il faut un $2 ; qu'as-tu de particulier ? Bonne question. Sur mon serveur perso,

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Le Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:26:03 +0200, steve dl...@bluewin.ch a écrit : D'où vient ce $5 ? Chez moi, comme chez beaucoup d'autres je pense, il faut un $2 ; qu'as-tu de particulier ? Bonne question. Sur mon serveur perso, besoin du 5e champ mais pas sur mon portable (2eme). Je vais

[Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Salut, Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ? history | awk '{print $5} ; ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 Chez moi: 11849 mutt 4671 cd 2615 ls 1949 l 1465 vim 953 lrt 618 cat 613 less 581 xpdf 486 ll (l='ls -lA', ll='ls -l'

Re : [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Le 30/06/2015 15:47:23, steve a écrit : Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ? history | awk '{print $5} ; ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 awk: ligne de commande:1: {print $5} ; awk: ligne de commande:1: ^ caractère incorrect « � » dans l'expression

Re: Re : [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Le 30-06-2015, à 15:57:42 +0200, nicolas.patr...@gmail.com a écrit : Le 30/06/2015 15:47:23, steve a écrit : Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ? history | awk '{print $5} ; ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 awk: ligne de commande:1: {print $5} ;

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

history | awk '{print $*2*} ; ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 100 vi 63 ls 44 crontab 41 apt-get 40 ssh 39 * 36 ll 34 top 33 tail 30 tcpdump Le 30/06/2015 15:47, steve a écrit : Salut, Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

2305 cd 1383 e 1267 grep 1262 lll 1171 mv 1081 less 1081 g 999 rm 846 cat 796 sudo 753 find 688 for e : emacsclient g : git lll : ls -ltra On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 03:47:23PM +0200, steve wrote: Salut, Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ? history | awk

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

'lut, Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ? C'est rigolo ça. FR-PORT:/home/fabricer# history | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 456 aptitude 132 killall 123 cd 101 ll 81 v 75 dmesg 71 joe 69 wget 62 cat

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

acastanofernan...@gmail.com À : debian-user-french@lists.debian.org Envoyé le : Mardi 30 juin 2015 16h50 Objet : Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées ben oui, normal... trollici c'est une liste Debian et non pas Ubuntu /troll :P Le 30/06/2015 16:38, steve a écrit : Le 30-06-2015, à 16:28

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

ben oui, normal... trollici c'est une liste Debian et non pas Ubuntu /troll :P Le 30/06/2015 16:38, steve a écrit : Le 30-06-2015, à 16:28:21 +0200, Fabrice Regnier a écrit : FR-PORT:/home/fabricer# history | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 ^

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Sur ma machine de travail : history | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 112 git 54 ll 39 cd 25 vi 23 curl 22 host 20 cat 19 tel 18 history 16 easy tel et easy sont des outils maison ;-) -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de

Re : [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

En tant qu’utilisateur : 108 time 63 ./pe-343.py 59 ./pe-493.py 32 aptitude 31 ls 16 ps 14 ./pe-425.py 11 top 9 less 9 balsa Mais ça dépend des terminaux : 108 time 78 ./pe-493.py 63 ./pe-343.py 51 ps 15 ./pe-521.py 15

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Le 30-06-2015, à 16:28:21 +0200, Fabrice Regnier a écrit : FR-PORT:/home/fabricer# history | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 ^ | Hum… tu bosses sous root ? -- Lisez la FAQ de la liste avant de

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Bonjour, ~$ history | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 136 vim 68 exit 59 ll 59 gs 56 uumg 48 cd 38 git 33 tree 29 echo 26 pstree # Taille de mon historique. ~$ history | wc -l 1018 Alors, explications : ;) - j'aime

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

screen 24 aptitude 20 curl 17 top 16 /etc/init.d/asterisk 15 exit 12 killall jerem Le 30/06/2015 18:05, fred a écrit : ~$ history | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 205 sudo 62 dir 39 cd 21 lsusb 18 lsmod 16 killall

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Le 30/06/2015 16:40, steve a écrit : Le 30-06-2015, à 16:28:21 +0200, Fabrice Regnier a écrit : FR-PORT:/home/fabricer# history | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 ^ | Hum… tu bosses sous root ?

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Bonjour, steve a écrit : Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ? J'aurais bien joué mais avec l'option suivante dans mon fichier ~/.bashrc, les résultats n'auraient rien à voir avec la réalité : HISTCONTROL=ignoreboth:erasedups Ceci étant, je suis à peu près certain que les

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Le 30 jun 2015 à 15:47 (+0200) steve dl...@bluewin.ch a écrit: Salut, Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ? history | awk '{print $5} ; ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 Bonjour, D'où vient ce $5 ? Chez moi, comme chez beaucoup d'autres je pense, il

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Bonne initiative et instructif sondage : Sur mon serveur : $ history | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 171 ls 134 vi 110 cd 106 service 48 e 47 ps 43 df 42 cat 30 exit 29 e2fsck Sur mon PC perso : 109 ls 75 e 54 ssh

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

2015-06-30 15:47 GMT+02:00 steve dl...@bluewin.ch: Salut, Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ? history | awk '{print $5} ; ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 Chez moi: 11849 mutt 4671 cd 2615 ls 1949 l 1465 vim 953 lrt 618 cat 613

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Le 30-06-2015, à 20:05:03 +0200, Eddy F. a écrit : Le 30 jun 2015 à 15:47 (+0200) steve dl...@bluewin.ch a écrit: Salut, Pour se détendre 2 minutes, que donne ceci chez vous ? history | awk '{print $5} ; ' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 Bonjour, D'où

Re: [Sondage] Top 10 des commandes utilisées

Le 30-06-2015, à 18:24:23 +0200, Fabrice Regnier a écrit : Le 30/06/2015 16:40, steve a écrit : Le 30-06-2015, à 16:28:21 +0200, Fabrice Regnier a écrit : FR-PORT:/home/fabricer# history | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10 ^

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >