Hi,
how can I get the results of doing a top sorted by memory usage from
an ssh command?
Sth like:
ssh a-computer top
Is this doable?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
avilella:
how can I get the results of doing a top sorted by memory usage from
an ssh command?
I am not sure what exactly you are trying to do, but
$ ssh -t host top
will show top's output from the remote host in your current terminal.
You need the -t option when you want to force ssh
On Fri May 16 2008 04:39:10 avilella wrote:
how can I get the results of doing a top sorted by memory usage from
an ssh command?
Sth like:
ssh a-computer top
Is this doable?
It's doable but ugly:
ssh a-computer top -b -n1 | tail -n+8 | sort -n -k1.46,1.50
You might want to see if ps
Hi list.
Is it normal for 'top' to show that most of your physical memory is
used when there aren't any processes running? (besides the usual init,
getty, klogd, sshd, etc).
I assume that this memory is being used for Linux caches - file
buffers etc to speed up disk access and so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/25/08 11:46, David wrote:
Hi list.
Is it normal for 'top' to show that most of your physical memory is
used when there aren't any processes running? (besides the usual init,
getty, klogd, sshd, etc).
Yes.
I assume that this memory
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 04/25/08 11:46, David wrote:
Is it normal for 'top' to show that most of your physical memory
is used when there aren't any processes running? (besides the
usual init, getty, klogd, sshd, etc).
Yes.
Yup.
I assume that this memory is being used
usage data,
but apps like top(1) will have to be rewritten to use the new info.
Er, what? Have we done away with RSS and VSZ, or are they just
momentarily lost? Is this Sid stuff?
http://virtualthreads.blogspot.com/2006/02/understanding-memory-usage-on-linux.html
Depending on how you
Hey!
I have just srated using mutt. :-) I am really loving it!
Only thing that I would like to know how to change is, by default mutt top
posts. I would like to configure mutt to bottom post by default when I
reply to an email.
I have googled for the naswer and only found instructions on how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/08 20:46, Julian De Marchi wrote:
Hey!
I have just srated using mutt. :-) I am really loving it!
Only thing that I would like to know how to change is, by default mutt top
posts. I would like to configure mutt to bottom post
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 09:03:43PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 03/11/08 20:46, Julian De Marchi wrote:
Only thing that I would like to know how to change is, by default
mutt top posts. I would like to configure mutt to bottom post by
default when I reply to an email.
I have googled
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 06:46:58 pm Julian De Marchi wrote:
Only thing that I would like to know how to change is, by default mutt top
posts. I would like to configure mutt to bottom post by default when I
reply to an email.
Mutt doesn't default to top posting, it defaults to putting
Julian De Marchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have just srated using mutt. :-) I am really loving it!
Only thing that I would like to know how to change is, by default mutt top =
posts. I would like to configure mutt to bottom post by default when I=20
reply to an email.
I have googled
You should be editing on the way to the bottom. Pure bottom-posting is
as bad as pure-top-posting. If I had just bottom-posed, you would see
Ron's signature lines, the debian-list signature line, and Ron telling
you to turn on line wrapping. As it is, I left more than I probably
should
Mutt doesn't default to top posting, it defaults to putting the cursor at the
start of the message so you can read along as you go down, interspersing your
reply and removing unnecessary text. This is not a bug: It is by design and
is a feature.
I am fully aware this is not a bug(flea
On Tuesday 11 March 2008 09:28:42 pm Julian De Marchi wrote:
Mutt doesn't default to top posting, it defaults to putting the cursor at
the start of the message so you can read along as you go down,
interspersing your reply and removing unnecessary text. This is not a
bug: It is by design
pessoas ignorem o fato e continuem enviando as confirmações).
Desculpe a ignorância! Mas o que seria top-post?
Enviar sua resposta acima da pergunta, exatamente como
você fez desta e da outra vez, ao contrário do recomendado que
é colocar as respostas abaixo das perguntas ou dos itens que
it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:58:09AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Exotic mathematics without a grounding in reality is medieval philosophy
trying to determine how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Two. No, seven!
Arg. You made me lose count!
-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 05:59 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:58:09AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Exotic mathematics without a grounding in reality is medieval philosophy
trying to determine how many angels can dance on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/17/08 12:46, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On 17/01/2008, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 8:08 AM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/01/2008, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ducks float, they must be made of wood
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/08 23:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
If ducks float, they must be made of wood (or small rocks), so if
the witch weighs the same as a duck, then she must be made of
wood and therefore, she'll float, so she's a witch.
The sad
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:55:15AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
It's been quite a while, and we can't quote the
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 17:37:16 +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
It's been quite a while, and we can't quote the whole movie.
and apparently, one can recover from
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:02:07 +0100 (CET)
s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, why don't your lines wrap at ca. 80 chars? Missed that lesson?
Huh? I set Claws to wrap at 70. I thought it would do that
automatically before sending the message...
Fixed.
--D.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
it all at once, then you are following
too closely. There's probably a reason I'm not a traffic engineer.
Just a side note (and even more off topic): In Germany (and as far as I
know the rest of Europe as well), text written on streets is top to bottom.
When I were in the US or South America
it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
that...
The sad thing is that I work for them.
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
On Jan 16, 2008 12:42 AM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/15/08 23:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
If ducks float, they must be made of wood (or small rocks), so if
the witch weighs the same as a duck, then she must be made of
wood and therefore, she'll float, so she's
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:55:15AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 12:42 AM, Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/15/08 23:14, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
[snip]
If ducks float, they must be made of wood (or small rocks), so if
the witch weighs the same as a duck, then she must
read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
On 15 Jan, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:23:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/15/08 19:24, s. keeling wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/15/08 17:05, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The problem, the oft-overlooked side comment made by one of the
Given that you're in the country that invented the witch-hunt, that's
not much surprise.
I wasn't aware that he was from Babylonia!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch-hunt#Antiquity
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
written on streets is top to bottom.
When I were in the US or South America it always seemed very strange to me
that the order of lines would be upside down.
I'm not alone!
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:56:28AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:55:15AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:56:28AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:55:15AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:53:34PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
[snip]
Well, now you're just contradicting.
I'd tell you why that's not true but there's a bunch of mean looking
guys at my door. I figure it's either the Spanish Inquisition or the
Business Software Alliance. (Is there much
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:07:41AM +0100, Dan H wrote:
Again: There is NO NEED to scroll through redundant stuff! You need to EDIT
the irrelevant stuff away! What's so hard to understand about this?
Do you notice that this posting, although it is deep in an ongoing thread,
covers barely
of etiquette. The practice
varies, and some lists work the other way, but on this and many lists
the convention is to top post, trim heartily, try to get the
attributions
Arghh... that should've been bottom post, or at least to not top post...
It the convention
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:23:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/08 19:24, s. keeling wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/15/08 17:05, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The problem, the oft-overlooked side comment made by one of the
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:53:34PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
[snip]
Well, now you're just contradicting.
I'd tell you why that's not true but there's a bunch of mean
looking guys at my door. I figure it's either the Spanish
Inquisition
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:12:07PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:53:34PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
[snip]
Well, now you're just contradicting.
I'd tell you why that's not true but there's a bunch of mean
:
my mail reader sort my mail in date order and links together all
the threaded emails. I read them in date/time order, if I follow
a thread from begging to end, then all i should have to do is read
the top posts, but if they bottom posted, then as the thread grows
I find I have to scroll
On Jan 16, 2008 8:08 AM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/01/2008, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ducks float, they must be made of wood (or small rocks), so if
the witch weighs the same as a duck, then she must be made of
wood and therefore, she'll float, so she's
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 8:08 AM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/01/2008, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ducks float, they must be made of wood (or small rocks), so if
the witch weighs the same as a duck, then she must be made of
wood and therefore, she'll
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:46:38 +1300
Chris Bannister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Its also to recommended to set the line wrap variable in your editor to
about 72 or so. I don't know how to set that in Slypheed Claws.
Configuration / Preferences / Compose / Wrapping
Chris.
Celejar
--
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:12:07PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:53:34PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
[snip]
Well, now you're just contradicting.
I'd tell
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 8:08 AM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/01/2008, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If ducks float, they must be made of wood (or small rocks),
so if the witch weighs the same as a duck, then she must be
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:43:23PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 05:12:07PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:53:34PM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:58:06 +1100
Alex Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I am trying to point out is for a normal user ( ie somebody who
is subscribed to the list), when a thread starts, you read them in
date/time order as them come in, why seems illogical to have to
scroll through stuff
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:49:52 -0900
Ken Irving [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, it's a social convention, a matter of etiquette. The
practice varies, and some lists work the other way, but on this and
many lists the convention is to top post
Huh? I don't think so, but even if what you say
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:58:46 +1100
Alex Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:25:14PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
Then the people posting are not trimming their posts as they
should.
or taken to the extreme, why not remove all the original post!
No, it's best to always trim
responding to into the relevant
parts, and then you reply separately to those points.
Although I do admit that if you start in the last email of a thread
it easier to read top to bottom
The idea is that every posting, even though it is far into some thread, is to a
certain extent self
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:52:04 +1100
Alex Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my mail reader sort my mail in date order and links together all
the threaded emails. I read them in date/time order, if I follow
a thread from begging to end, then all i should have to do is read
the top posts
Gulliver-style about which end
of the egg to open?
Am I the open person who finds this 'noise' about top-posting to be more
than just a tad purile?
Email and txt-spk, both seen by many to be the scurge of any form of
intellectual communication; .. and we're arguing about whether or not
the words
Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
Rationality, because while some cultures read left-right, and
others
/08 10:21, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of
top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
Rationality, because while some cultures read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/08 06:36, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
[snip]
I always start at the last page and write upwards so my diary becomes
illegible to all, including me, in order to attempt to have time move
backwards. At my age that become
Ron Johnson wrote:
Exotic mathematics without a grounding in reality is medieval
philosophy trying to determine how many angels can dance on the head
of a pin.
Two. No, seven!
Arg. You made me lose count!
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:58:09AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Exotic mathematics without a grounding in reality is medieval philosophy
trying to determine how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Two. No, seven!
Arg. You made me lose count!
oh come on. Everyone
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:24:52AM +, I.E.Broadbent wrote:
blimey ... what's next folks, arguing Gulliver-style about which end
of the egg to open?
oh please. Don't start that old flame-war again!
Everyone knows it's the small end.
...
Can we kill this OT subject now please?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 03:36:26PM +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:34:28PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
There's probably a reason I'm not a traffic engineer.
my thoughts as well
;-)
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:28:15AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/08 06:36, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
[snip]
I always start at the last page and write upwards so my diary becomes
illegible to all, including me, in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/08 16:46, Alex Samad wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:28:15AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/15/08 06:36, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
[snip]
I always start at the last page and write upwards so my diary becomes
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 04:57:15PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/15/08 16:46, Alex Samad wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:28:15AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Exotic mathematics without a grounding in reality is medieval
philosophy trying to determine how many angels can dance on the head
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/08 17:05, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 04:57:15PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/15/08 16:46, Alex Samad wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:28:15AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
Exotic mathematics without a grounding
On Jan 14, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
This is a bottom-posting list, like every other list that has such a
rule. I've never heard of a list that specifically _prefers_ top
posting. If there is such a list, I doubt that it would be of a very
technical nature.
While not technically
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jan 14, 2008 6:43 PM, s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe (maybe wrongly ) that this mailing list is a non
top-posting list, I try and conform.
You're correct. List policy prefers snip irrelevancies and bottom
post.
Where are you
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jan 14, 2008 1:03 PM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should read this:
http://what-is-what.com/what_is/top_posting.html
I prefer http://learn.to/quote for that; the URL you mention only
Tried that lately? Goes to The Webalias Network.
--
On Jan 15, 2008 4:20 PM, David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
This is a bottom-posting list, like every other list that has such a
rule. I've never heard of a list that specifically _prefers_ top
posting. If there is such a list, I doubt
Dan H [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, it's best to always trim the original to the extent that it still
contains the relevant context for your reply. Half a dozen lines is usually
enough.
Of course I've got about 15 years of Usenet experience under my belt. That
teaches discipline!
So, why
On Jan 15, 2008 4:50 PM, s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jan 14, 2008 1:03 PM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should read this:
http://what-is-what.com/what_is/top_posting.html
I prefer http://learn.to/quote for that; the URL you
David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jan 14, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
This is a bottom-posting list, like every other list that has such a
rule. I've never heard of a list that specifically _prefers_ top
posting. If there is such a list, I doubt that it would be of a very
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/15/08 17:05, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The problem, the oft-overlooked side comment made by one of the
peasants. Small rocks float. So though she may weigh the same as a
Really?
Pumice?
Since when are witches made of wood? Or small rocks?
On Jan 15, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Stuff like that makes me think I'm better off now driving a truck.
Pays about the same as a decent, call-center and outsource-free
environment either way...
Isn't NAFTA about to in-source Mexican trucks to take care of that?
--
To
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:28:15 -0600
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Exotic mathematics without a grounding in reality is medieval
philosophy trying to determine how many angels can dance on the head
of a pin.
Pure mathematics consists entirely of assertions to the effect that, if
is top-posting such a bad thing?
On Jan 15, 2008 5:36 PM, David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Stuff like that makes me think I'm better off now driving a truck.
Pays about the same as a decent, call-center and outsource-free
environment either way...
Isn't NAFTA about
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 08:42:31PM -0500, Celejar wrote:
Thus mathematics may be defined as the subject in which we never know
what we are talking about, nor whether what we are saying is true.
People who have been puzzled by the beginnings of mathematics will, I
hope, find comfort in this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/08 19:24, s. keeling wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/15/08 17:05, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The problem, the oft-overlooked side comment made by one of the
peasants. Small rocks float. So though she may weigh the same as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/08 20:43, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008 5:36 PM, David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 15, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Stuff like that makes me think I'm better off now driving a truck.
Pays about the same as a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/15/08 20:32, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On 15/01/2008, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 1:03 PM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should read this:
http://what-is-what.com/what_is/top_posting.html
I prefer
On 16/01/2008, David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*not* trim any of the quote history. I assume this was so whichever
tech support drone in India got my latest message would be able to see
the whole history.
[OT] Do not assume and this *this* tech drone from India does favour
trimming
Sudev Barar wrote:
On 16/01/2008, David Brodbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*not* trim any of the quote history. I assume this was so whichever
tech support drone in India got my latest message would be able to see
the whole history.
[OT] Do not assume and this *this* tech drone from India
Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 15/01/2008, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 1:03 PM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should read this:
http://what-is-what.com/what_is/top_posting.html
I prefer http://learn.to/quote for that; the URL you mention
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:23:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/15/08 19:24, s. keeling wrote:
Ron Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 01/15/08 17:05, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
The problem, the oft-overlooked side comment made by one of the
peasants. Small rocks float. So though she may
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
It's been quite a while, and we can't quote the whole movie.
and apparently, one can recover from being turned into a newt. ;)
Only if 'es not dead yet.
Or been eaten by a swallow, laden or unladen.
Hal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
It's been quite a while, and we can't quote the whole movie.
and apparently, one can recover from being turned into a newt. ;)
Only if 'es not dead yet.
Or
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Alex Samad wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:23:37AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
It's been quite a while, and we can't quote the whole movie.
and apparently, one can recover from being
On Jan 14, 2008 11:21 AM, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
The 5100
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/14/08 10:21, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question
On 14/01/2008, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
Thanks
You should
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:32:53AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/14/08 10:21, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/14/08 15:57, Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:32:53AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/14/08 10:21, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something
Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:32:53AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/14/08 10:21, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g
wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
Rationality, because while some cultures read left-right, and
others read right-left, all read top-bottom. None read bottom
, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
Rationality, because while some cultures read left
wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
Rationality, because while some cultures read left-right, and
others read right-left, all read top-bottom. None
501 - 600 of 1631 matches
Mail list logo
