Re: Terrible samba2samba throughput, any ideas?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Pernegger wrote: >> Any particular reason why you are using SAMBA instead of NFS? > > Not really, just that some Windows clients need access to the same > files. Sharing the same (part of a) filesystem via both samba and nfs > doesn't sound

Re: Terrible samba2samba throughput, any ideas?

Any particular reason why you are using SAMBA instead of NFS? Not really, just that some Windows clients need access to the same files. Sharing the same (part of a) filesystem via both samba and nfs doesn't sound like a good idea intuitively. Thanks, C.

Re: Terrible samba2samba throughput, any ideas?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Pernegger wrote: > Hi! > > Short version: I only get 5-6MB/s on a 1Gbit connection ... > > Longer version: > > Client: Athlon 64 3500+, 2GB RAM with an Intel Desktop Gb NIC (32/33) > and a WD Raptor. > Server: Dual Athlon MP 1900+ with an

Terrible samba2samba throughput, any ideas?

Hi! Short version: I only get 5-6MB/s on a 1Gbit connection ... Longer version: Client: Athlon 64 3500+, 2GB RAM with an Intel Desktop Gb NIC (32/33) and a WD Raptor. Server: Dual Athlon MP 1900+ with an Intel Server Gb NIC (64/66, I think) and a 3ware 7500 array (RAID-5, 8 fairly recent 300GB