Re: The technically challenged WAS Re: Are spammers subscibing to the lists?

1997-06-18 Thread Jens B. Jorgensen
John Foster wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, M BAILEY wrote: > > > > > > > OK, so I'm "technically challenged"! How do I put 1200 clients in 2 C > > > class networks with static IPs? > > > > > > > Are these all unix stations or are some of these Win95/NT if the latter > > of the two you can buy a

Re: The technically challenged WAS Re: Are spammers subscibing to the lists?

1997-06-18 Thread Paul Wade
On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, John Foster wrote: > Ah so this is a new maening of "technically challenged" that I've > never met before! When I originally used the term, I was referring to the ISP's who don't have DNS info for their IP's at all. If they could at least make sure that reverse lookup returns

The technically challenged WAS Re: Are spammers subscibing to the lists?

1997-06-18 Thread John Foster
On Wed, 18 Jun 1997, M BAILEY wrote: > > > > OK, so I'm "technically challenged"! How do I put 1200 clients in 2 C > > class networks with static IPs? > > > > Are these all unix stations or are some of these Win95/NT if the latter > of the two you can buy a product from Bay Networks that lets