On 10/28/2014 8:45 PM, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
John Hasler wrote:
Martinx writes:
I'm wondering here about this subject and what it means...
So, what if `udev` becomes useless without `systemd` as PID1?
The someone will fork it. But it won't happen, partly for that
Hi.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:11:12PM -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
Guys,
I'm wondering here about this subject and what it means...
So, what if `udev` becomes useless without `systemd` as PID1?
Then we'll use busybox's mdev instead of it. Has less features, yet all
the needed parts are
Guys,
I'm wondering here about this subject and what it means...
So, what if `udev` becomes useless without `systemd` as PID1?
It [udev package] will then, depends on `systemd-sysv`... Right!?
Effectively killing others init systems (including `uselessd`), and
Ian's proposal, unless your
Martinx writes:
I'm wondering here about this subject and what it means...
So, what if `udev` becomes useless without `systemd` as PID1?
The someone will fork it. But it won't happen, partly for that reason.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
John Hasler wrote:
Martinx writes:
I'm wondering here about this subject and what it means...
So, what if `udev` becomes useless without `systemd` as PID1?
The someone will fork it. But it won't happen, partly for that reason.
I believe it's called eudev -
5 matches
Mail list logo