Re: Thinking about preserving freedom of choice of init systems and future of udev...

2014-10-29 Thread Tanstaafl
On 10/28/2014 8:45 PM, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: John Hasler wrote: Martinx writes: I'm wondering here about this subject and what it means... So, what if `udev` becomes useless without `systemd` as PID1? The someone will fork it. But it won't happen, partly for that

Re: Thinking about preserving freedom of choice of init systems and future of udev...

2014-10-29 Thread Reco
Hi. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:11:12PM -0200, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: Guys, I'm wondering here about this subject and what it means... So, what if `udev` becomes useless without `systemd` as PID1? Then we'll use busybox's mdev instead of it. Has less features, yet all the needed parts are

Thinking about preserving freedom of choice of init systems and future of udev...

2014-10-28 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Guys, I'm wondering here about this subject and what it means... So, what if `udev` becomes useless without `systemd` as PID1? It [udev package] will then, depends on `systemd-sysv`... Right!? Effectively killing others init systems (including `uselessd`), and Ian's proposal, unless your

Re: Thinking about preserving freedom of choice of init systems and future of udev...

2014-10-28 Thread John Hasler
Martinx writes: I'm wondering here about this subject and what it means... So, what if `udev` becomes useless without `systemd` as PID1? The someone will fork it. But it won't happen, partly for that reason. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Thinking about preserving freedom of choice of init systems and future of udev...

2014-10-28 Thread Miles Fidelman
John Hasler wrote: Martinx writes: I'm wondering here about this subject and what it means... So, what if `udev` becomes useless without `systemd` as PID1? The someone will fork it. But it won't happen, partly for that reason. I believe it's called eudev -