Eduardo M KALINOWSKI writes:
On Ter, 21 Jun 2011, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Camaleón writes:
But at least you did not reply to a digest.
Sure. I'd say digests are for reading more than replying.
In addition, there are some MUAs that can extract individual messages
from digests. Emacs gnus
On Seg, 20 Jun 2011, wrote:
[To see how it works, I've tried to include all the References
in the header in this message. If Chuck or Lee complains I'll
know there's an error. ]
This message broke the thread. It has not References or In-Reply-To headers.
As someone said, your MUA should do
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:21:01 -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On Seg, 20 Jun 2011, wrote:
[To see how it works, I've tried to include all the References in the
header in this message. If Chuck or Lee complains I'll know there's an
error. ]
This message broke the thread. It has not
Camaleón writes:
But at least you did not reply to a digest.
Sure. I'd say digests are for reading more than replying.
In addition, there are some MUAs that can extract individual messages
from digests. Emacs gnus does this.
--
Alberto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Ter, 21 Jun 2011, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Camaleón writes:
But at least you did not reply to a digest.
Sure. I'd say digests are for reading more than replying.
In addition, there are some MUAs that can extract individual messages
from digests. Emacs gnus does this.
But does it set
5 matches
Mail list logo
