Am 2007-03-28 09:08:01, schrieb Anthony Campbell:
> On 27 Mar 2007, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > There are experimental projects, but sadly most (actually, all I found)
> > appear to be stagnant or abandoned. Those that are stagnant but not
> > actually abandoned won't compile with newer versions of com
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 16:18 -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Joe writes:
> > As of about a year ago, extremely poor. I was looking for scriptable OCR,
> > and couldn't find anything Open Source that was even barely usable with
> > large, clear characters. While personal OCR on Windows was a reasonable
>
Joe writes:
> As of about a year ago, extremely poor. I was looking for scriptable OCR,
> and couldn't find anything Open Source that was even barely usable with
> large, clear characters. While personal OCR on Windows was a reasonable
> price, once it was scriptable the price increased by more tha
Ron Johnson wrote:
There seem to be a few OCR projects in the Debian repository. Don't
know how good they are, though.
As of about a year ago, extremely poor. I was looking for scriptable
OCR, and couldn't find anything Open Source that was even barely
usable with large, clear characters. Whi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/28/07 03:08, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 27 Mar 2007, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> There are experimental projects, but sadly most (actually, all I found)
>> appear to be stagnant or abandoned. Those that are stagnant but not
>> actual
On 27 Mar 2007, Greg Folkert wrote:
[snip]
>
> There are experimental projects, but sadly most (actually, all I found)
> appear to be stagnant or abandoned. Those that are stagnant but not
> actually abandoned won't compile with newer versions of compilers or
> newer versions of glibc or both.
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 21:39 -0400, Jim Hyslop wrote:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Am 2007-03-12 11:25:57, schrieb Mike McCarty:
> >
> >>This whole thread strikes me as unusually rancorous. ISTM
> >>that MS is providing a Good Thing, and STILL one complains about
> >>being "stuck" with it. Here is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-03-12 11:25:57, schrieb Mike McCarty:
>
>>This whole thread strikes me as unusually rancorous. ISTM
>>that MS is providing a Good Thing, and STILL one complains about
>>being "stuck" with it. Here is a place where MS
Am 2007-03-12 11:25:57, schrieb Mike McCarty:
> This whole thread strikes me as unusually rancorous. ISTM
> that MS is providing a Good Thing, and STILL one complains about
> being "stuck" with it. Here is a place where MS is better than
> Linux, yet that still does not get acknowledged.
No, M$ is
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:48:37 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> On 19.03.07 21:54, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>> ..try play with these searches in your CLI:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Independent-Reformer $ apt-cache search recogni |wc -l
>> 123
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Independent-
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:54:36 -0500 (EST), Don wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I have a friend who would like to get away from Microsoft system
> > dependence. The show stopper seems to be voice recognition. She is
> > partially disabled and needs Naturally Speaking or equivalent.
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:54:36 -0500 (EST), Don wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I have a friend who would like to get away from Microsoft system
> dependence. The show stopper seems to be voice recognition. She is
> partially disabled and needs Naturally Speaking or equivalent.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/13/07 01:51, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Mike McCarty wrote:
>>
>>> This whole thread strikes me as unusually rancorous. ISTM
>>> that MS is providing a Good Thing, and STILL one complains about
>>> being "stuck" with it. Here is a
Steve Lamb wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
This whole thread strikes me as unusually rancorous. ISTM
that MS is providing a Good Thing, and STILL one complains about
being "stuck" with it. Here is a place where MS is better than
Linux, yet that still does not get acknowledged.
Er, when wasn't it a
Mike McCarty wrote:
> This whole thread strikes me as unusually rancorous. ISTM
> that MS is providing a Good Thing, and STILL one complains about
> being "stuck" with it. Here is a place where MS is better than
> Linux, yet that still does not get acknowledged.
Er, when wasn't it ackowledged?
Steve Lamb wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
If she really needs VR, then she's stuck with MS Windows.
Er, well, maybe not. Is there a chance that OSX would give her what she
needs? I know it isn't free (speech/beer) but IMHO it is a step closer. I
mean it isn't Microsoft and it is based on F
Ron Johnson wrote:
> If she really needs VR, then she's stuck with MS Windows.
Er, well, maybe not. Is there a chance that OSX would give her what she
needs? I know it isn't free (speech/beer) but IMHO it is a step closer. I
mean it isn't Microsoft and it is based on FreeBSD.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/10/07 13:54, Don Hayward wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a friend who would like to get away from Microsoft system
> dependence. The show stopper seems to be voice recognition. She is
> partially disabled and needs Naturally Speaking or equivalent. S
Hi,
I have a friend who would like to get away from Microsoft system
dependence. The show stopper seems to be voice recognition. She is
partially disabled and needs Naturally Speaking or equivalent. She
uses it for live dictation as well as recording to a digital recorder
followed by transcrip
19 matches
Mail list logo
