On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:53:01PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
This will be a problem, as you should first image the disk(s) and
work from the images, not the physical disk. It is especially
important for the disk throwing errors, every read attempt may worsen
it's condition.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:17 PM, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
1)
I have a hard disk (1Tb, the bigger) which gave me many errors when I am
trying to read it. It makes it very slow to even read, but I've been able to
determine that it contains jpg images with a classic file browser. I
On 27/12/2012 22:17, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and deleted
partitions are different things, I know that.
Let me explain my (they are, in fact, friend's problems) two problems
(from different peoples).
===
0) the common
I have heard good things of PhotoRec:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoRec
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec
But I have no personal experience of it. The advice is always to
copy the
drive that needs rescuing to another drive, and work on the copy, not
the
orginal. Again, I have not
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:50 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
I have heard good things of PhotoRec:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoRec
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec
But I have no personal experience of it. The advice is always to
copy the
drive that needs
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 13:19 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:50 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
I have heard good things of PhotoRec:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoRec
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec
But I have no personal experience of
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:17:56PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and
deleted partitions are different things, I know that.
...
(2), I've more hopes, IF the user stopped the destructive process
before the disk was
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:19:21PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:50 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
I have heard good things of PhotoRec:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PhotoRec
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec
But I have no personal
This will be a problem, as you should first image the disk(s) and
work from the images, not the physical disk. It is especially
important for the disk throwing errors, every read attempt may worsen
it's condition. Use tools like (g)ddrescue to make a copy despite
read
errors.
I know, and am
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 21:35 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:17:56PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and
deleted partitions are different things, I know that.
...
(2), I've more hopes, IF
I only can repeat, that the OP by all means should mount the drive
read
only.
Mounting with -ro sounds wiser to me, I think you are true.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 27/12/12 18:17, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and
deleted partitions are different things, I know that.
Let me explain my (they are, in fact, friend's problems) two
problems (from different peoples).
===
0) the common
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 21:45:20 +0900
Osamu Aoki os...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:19:21PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 12:50 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
I have heard good things of PhotoRec:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:23:47PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
...
PS: Even if you make a backup first, by all means mount the drive or
partition read only, before you access it.
Hmmm... Maybe I was too short on explanation.
The best practice is NOT TO MOUNT AT ALL.
If your desktop system
On Friday 28 December 2012 18:26:08 Osamu Aoki wrote:
PS: I am not recommending to mount nor work on the original data disk.
Several people have said that Osamu, including me - even if less eruditely
than you. But the difficulty is that the problem disk does not belong to the
OP, but to a
Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and
deleted partitions are different things, I know that.
Let me explain my (they are, in fact, friend's problems) two problems
(from different peoples).
===
0) the common part.
By the past, I've did some researches about forensics
On Thursday 27 December 2012 21:17:56 berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Ok, first, sorry to ask two questions at a time: dead drives and
deleted partitions are different things, I know that.
Let me explain my (they are, in fact, friend's problems) two problems
(from different peoples).
17 matches
Mail list logo
