Re: UOL Anti-Spam

2005-12-19 Thread Niall Donegan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gene Heskett wrote: > Wel, sufficient bounces have been sent their way by now, by me, that if > they wanted to do something about it, they would have. The fact that > they haven't says volumes, and should really result in the serial > numbered meth

Re: UOL Anti-Spam

2005-12-19 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 19 December 2005 10:55, Steve Block wrote: >On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:49:42PM +, Niall Donegan wrote: >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>Gene Heskett wrote: >>> On Monday 19 December 2005 09:39, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> >>> And I made a post to this list, instantly

Re: UOL Anti-Spam

2005-12-19 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 19 December 2005 10:49, Niall Donegan wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >Gene Heskett wrote: >> On Monday 19 December 2005 09:39, Gene Heskett wrote: >> >> And I made a post to this list, instantly answered by a 5kb chunk >> of undecipherable html from <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: UOL Anti-Spam

2005-12-19 Thread Steve Block
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 03:49:42PM +, Niall Donegan wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gene Heskett wrote: On Monday 19 December 2005 09:39, Gene Heskett wrote: And I made a post to this list, instantly answered by a 5kb chunk of undecipherable html from <[EMAIL PROTECTE

UOL Anti-Spam

2005-12-19 Thread Niall Donegan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 19 December 2005 09:39, Gene Heskett wrote: > > And I made a post to this list, instantly answered by a 5kb chunk of > undecipherable html from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > How the hell do we get rid of this? Good luck w