Shaya Potter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Will anything break if I dont have /dev/pts support compiled into my
kernel?
If you have devfs enabled? No, I think devfs subsumes devpts
filesystem support. But if you don't use devfs, you probably do want
/dev/pts support (and make sure your
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:47:24PM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
Will anything break if I dont have /dev/pts support compiled into my
kernel?
If you have devfs enabled? No, I think devfs subsumes devpts
filesystem support. But if you don't use devfs, you probably do want
/dev/pts support
So I'm testing out various pppoe clients for linux for the local telco,
but they all seem to require Unix98 ptys. I believe that I have done
everything necessary to get them working:
- kernel in use is 2.2.12, compiled with Unix98 ptys and pty filesystem
- glibc 2.1.2 (and ldso upgraded
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 09:56:01 -0500, Jeff Hildebrand wrote:
I believe that I have done everything necessary to get them working:
- kernel in use is 2.2.12, compiled with Unix98 ptys and pty filesystem
- glibc 2.1.2 (and ldso upgraded to the necessary level)
Your system can now use Unix98
but the Debian system is way better. Kudos to whoever
designed the make-kpkg system.
I decided to compile in support for Unix98 PTYs since
I am already using glibc-2.1. Being the newbie that
I am, I can't tell the differences b/w Unix98 PTYs
and the old style ttys (is that right?).
I am hoping
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 08:50:47 -0400, Salman Ahmed wrote:
I decided to compile in support for Unix98 PTYs since I am already using
glibc-2.1. Being the newbie that I am, I can't tell the differences b/w
Unix98 PTYs and the old style ttys (is that right?).
Well, ptys (pseudo-ttys (tty
Hello once again.
aterm requires Unix98 ptys. This is something I know nothing about. All I
know is that they are different from oldstyle pty stuff.
I run 2.0.36 on potato right now. (I am hesitant to upgrade to 2.2.x due to
problems I have had in the past with dhcp I did the 2.0.x to 2.2.x
7 matches
Mail list logo