On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Now I am trying to do an apt-get upgrade of the system to slink. But
> I get the following error:
>
> WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed
> This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
> getty
> 235 pack
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Mark Phillips wrote:
> I'm not sure whether this will work. The system is currently a libc5
> "bo" system. I want it to become a "slink" system. I can't just use
> dpkg to install the potato version of apt, because it's a libc6
> version. I would need to install potato-ap
> > > # apt-get install apt
> > > Updating package status cache...done
> > > Checking system integrity...ok
> > > Sorry, apt is already the newest version
> > >
> > > I think the problem is that the version I installed was
> > > apt_0.1.10_i386-libc5.deb whereas the slink version is "0.1.9". What
> > Okay, I tried this but got:
> >
> > # apt-get install apt
> > Updating package status cache...done
> > Checking system integrity...ok
> > Sorry, apt is already the newest version
> >
> > I think the problem is that the version I installed was
> > apt_0.1.10_i386-libc5.deb whereas the slink ve
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Okay, I tried this but got:
>
> # apt-get install apt
> Updating package status cache...done
> Checking system integrity...ok
> Sorry, apt is already the newest version
>
> I think the problem is that the version I installed was
> apt_0.1.10_i386-libc
> Yes, the old APT did not put an arch string and full version on the file
> so it won't read a new apt cache. The best bet is to use APT to install
> the new APT from slink, manually renaming the files if you have to and
> then install the potato APT.
Okay, I tried this but got:
# apt-get insta
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Presumably this older apt doesn't stick a "_i386" on the end of
> packages whereas the newer apt does. Hence the older apt doesn't
> realize that all the packages have already been downloaded.
Yes, the old APT did not put an arch string and full versi
> On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> > My second best option is to use nfs to symlink the laptop's
> > /var/cache/apt/archives to the desktop's. This might work --- the
> > only problem here is that dselect-apt decides to delete all the files
> > in the cache! How can I turn this off?
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 11:55:47AM -0600, Mike Merten wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 11:12:37PM +1030, Mark Phillips wrote:
> > I have installed Slink on my desktop using apt. It downloaded a whole
> > lot of package files to do this (but dselect, I think, has now deleted
> > them).
> >
> > Now
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 11:02:34AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Mark Phillips wrote:
>
> > My second best option is to use nfs to symlink the laptop's
> > /var/cache/apt/archives to the desktop's. This might work --- the
> > only problem here is that dselect-apt decides
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Mark Phillips wrote:
> My second best option is to use nfs to symlink the laptop's
> /var/cache/apt/archives to the desktop's. This might work --- the
> only problem here is that dselect-apt decides to delete all the files
> in the cache! How can I turn this off???
This ac
On Wed, Mar 24, 1999 at 11:12:37PM +1030, Mark Phillips wrote:
> I have installed Slink on my desktop using apt. It downloaded a whole
> lot of package files to do this (but dselect, I think, has now deleted
> them).
>
> Now I have a laptop which needs to be upgraded to Slink. It would
> appear
Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have installed Slink on my desktop using apt Now I have a
> laptop which needs to be upgraded to Slink. It would appear that
> I'm going to have to download all these files again!
The simplest way to avoid multiple downloads is to use a caching
p
I have installed Slink on my desktop using apt. It downloaded a whole
lot of package files to do this (but dselect, I think, has now deleted
them).
Now I have a laptop which needs to be upgraded to Slink. It would
appear that I'm going to have to download all these files again!
What would be ni
14 matches
Mail list logo