Re: Using apt-get upgrade-Any way to get list first? Solved!

2000-12-18 Thread Jonathan Gift
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 01:37:54AM -0600, will trillich wrote: > but there's lots of overhead for ftp. (okay, i'm exaggerating; > if you know exactly which file to ftp in advance, you can > skip all the LS and CD, but there's still some extra finagling > that HTTP doesn't need.) Good point. I thin

Re: Using apt-get upgrade-Any way to get list first? Solved!

2000-12-18 Thread will trillich
Jonathan Gift wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 08:08:18PM -0600, will trillich wrote: > > > > try > > apt-setup > > or if you don't have that, > > apt-get install base-config > > which provides it. it lets you select, first of all, > > which method (http/ftp) to use. > > > > my sourc

Re: Using apt-get upgrade-Any way to get list first? Solved!

2000-12-18 Thread Jonathan Gift
On Sun, Dec 17, 2000 at 08:08:18PM -0600, will trillich wrote: > > try > apt-setup > or if you don't have that, > apt-get install base-config > which provides it. it lets you select, first of all, > which method (http/ftp) to use. > > my sources.list resembles this: > > deb htt

Re: Using apt-get upgrade-Any way to get list first? Solved!

2000-12-17 Thread will trillich
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 11:26:53AM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: > > > BTW, do you know the deb ftp address for sources.list? I only have the > > > http one and the ftp would be faster. > > > > there's just been a thread recently about ftp vs. http, and how > > http should be faster. > > > > to see

Re: Using apt-get upgrade-Any way to get list first? Solved!

2000-12-17 Thread will trillich
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 06:44:47PM +0200, Tommi Komulainen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 04:54:20PM -0500, Mullins, Ron wrote: > > > > If you use APT, you can 'apt-get upgrade -u' which will show you the > > packages to be upgraded. You can then say no to continuing and put on hold > > anything

Re: Using apt-get upgrade-Any way to get list first? Solved!

2000-12-15 Thread Tommi Komulainen
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 04:54:20PM -0500, Mullins, Ron wrote: > > If you use APT, you can 'apt-get upgrade -u' which will show you the > packages to be upgraded. You can then say no to continuing and put on hold > anything that you don't want coming down the pipe. You can achieve the same by addi

Re: Using apt-get upgrade-Any way to get list first? Solved!

2000-12-15 Thread Jonathan Gift
> > BTW, do you know the deb ftp address for sources.list? I only have the > > http one and the ftp would be faster. > > there's just been a thread recently about ftp vs. http, and how > http should be faster. > > to see if it's true for you, munge your sources.list to use FTP, > and do "apt-get

Re: Using apt-get upgrade-Any way to get list first? Solved!

2000-12-15 Thread will trillich
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 07:10:23AM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 04:54:20PM -0500, Mullins, Ron wrote: > > I don't see anyone having replied yet, so > > > > If you use APT, you can 'apt-get upgrade -u' which will show you the > > packages to be upgraded. You can then sa

Using apt-get upgrade-Any way to get list first? Solved!

2000-12-15 Thread Jonathan Gift
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 04:54:20PM -0500, Mullins, Ron wrote: > I don't see anyone having replied yet, so > > If you use APT, you can 'apt-get upgrade -u' which will show you the > packages to be upgraded. You can then say no to continuing and put on hold > anything that you don't want coming

Re: Q: Using apt-get upgrade-Any way to get list first? Solved!

2000-12-09 Thread Jonathan Gift
Thanks for the feedback. Someone had earlier also suggested using apt(get -u upgrade to get the list and it worked. I'll keep yours on file as well. Jonathan -- "Hey, I think I finally got the hang of i-"