Hi, Michael and others.
On Feb 23 2006, Michael M. wrote:
> Last time I checked, rtorrent was available only in Sid, and aptitude
> complained when I marked it for installation.
That's strange. I've been using a plain/vanilla etch system here (in
fact, I always track testing) and I *do* have rtor
Rogério Brito wrote:
And another suggestion would be to use rtorrent, which is much less fat
than using bittornado, the original bittorrent client or azureus (which
needs a Java Virtual Machine environment to be run).
Last time I checked, rtorrent was available only in Sid, and aptitude
com
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 06:39:54AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
>On Feb 22 2006, Peter Colton wrote:
>> http is not a very good way of downloading large file. You would be
>> better of using the torrent method.
>
>This is definitely a good suggestion. More people should use
>bittorrent, because:
>
>
On Feb 22 2006, Peter Colton wrote:
> http is not a very good way of downloading large file. You would be
> better of using the torrent method.
This is definitely a good suggestion. More people should use bittorrent,
because:
* you are always "giving back" to the community when you use torrent
4 matches
Mail list logo
