On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 09:53, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14:14:00 +0930 Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Instead of saying, 'You can't pass this
> > software on. You must buy it from the source,' it says, 'You can't
> > buy this software from the source. If you pass i
On 0, "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14:14:00 +0930 Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Instead of saying, 'You can't pass this
> > software on. You must buy it from the source,' it says, 'You can't
> > buy this software from the source. If you pass
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14:14:00 +0930 Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Instead of saying, 'You can't pass this
> software on. You must buy it from the source,' it says, 'You can't
> buy this software from the source. If you pass it on, you must make
> sure that the next person has the same rig
On 0, Antonio Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >The issue is not the modification of the hardware, per se, but rather
> >the data that can then be pirated after the modification is made.
> >Therefore, the one alternative is to limit piracy. In order to do that,
> >strict policing of
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:23:01AM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> Pure crap. Let me give you an example: You haven't paid property tax for
> a while. Then your property can be taken away from you. Which means it
> was never yours. You just had a licence to say it was yours. As soon as
> you
Edward Guldemond wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:23:01AM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
>
>
>>By the way, I like the idea of the duel. That would really be great,
>>if they want to fight, let them do it themselves and stop messing the
>>lives of others (who will not make any money from the
On 4 Oct 2002, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Gov't bureaucrats can't just walk over to the County Records Office and
> rip up your deed. The gov't must have a very good reason to do so, and
> it takes a long time, and there are many hearings, appeals, etc.
Up here in Ontario, Canada at least, it's not r
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:39:19AM -0400, Edward Guldemond wrote:
> (Disclaimer: I am an American. Maybe Mr. Rodriguez is as well, and if
> so, then that's fine. I'm just venting after listening to Gerhard
> Schroeder of Germany and after reading some of his campaign material.)
Please take thi
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:23:01AM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> By the way, I like the idea of the duel. That would really be great,
> if they want to fight, let them do it themselves and stop messing the
> lives of others (who will not make any money from the oil anyway!)
>
(Disclaimer:
Pure crap. Let me give you an example: You haven't paid property tax for
a while. Then your property can be taken away from you. Which means it
was never yours. You just had a licence to say it was yours. As soon as
you stopped paying the yearly fee for the license, the truth came out.
So, let
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 21:56, Vector wrote:
> > Tom writes:
>[snip]
> property ownership in the US has become, at best, a joke. Even if you do
> have it paid off, they city in which you live can come and take it from you
> because you aren't "conforming" to their beautification ordinances or other
>"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry
>into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It
>both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of
>war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and
> Tom writes:
> > Man, and you guys call this the land of freedom?
>
> The "Housing Associations" he is talking about are private associations of
> homeowners. He agreed to abide by their rules when he bought his house.
> --
yeah, well...it used to be the land of freedom. It's still closer to
f
13 matches
Mail list logo
