Re: USB camera; was Re: Video input vs. systemctl enable.

2017-09-21 Thread anonymous
Hi. On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:22:48PM +, Curt wrote: > On 2017-09-20, Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:56:22AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > >> * From: Reco > >> * Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:20:18 +0300 > >> > What does 'lsusb' and 'lsusb -t' show for

Re: USB camera; was Re: Video input vs. systemctl enable.

2017-09-21 Thread Curt
On 2017-09-20, Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:56:22AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: >> *From: Reco >> *Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:20:18 +0300 >> > What does 'lsusb' and 'lsusb -t' show for you? >> >> peter@dalton:~$ lsusb >> Bus 001 Device 006: ID 045e:00f8 Micro

Re: Video input vs. systemctl enable.

2017-09-20 Thread peter
* From: Reco * Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:03:39 +0300 > modprobe uvcvideo > > echo 045e 00f8 > /sys/module/uvcvideo/drivers/usb\:uvcvideo/new_id > > ls -al /dev/video* root@dalton:/sys/module/uvcvideo/drivers/usb:uvcvideo# echo 045e 00f8 > new_id root@dalton:/sys/module/uvcvideo/driv

Re: USB camera; was Re: Video input vs. systemctl enable.

2017-09-20 Thread Reco
Hi. On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 05:56:22AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > * From: Reco > * Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:20:18 +0300 > > What does 'lsusb' and 'lsusb -t' show for you? > > peter@dalton:~$ lsusb > Bus 001 Device 006: ID 045e:00f8 Microsoft Corp. LifeCam NX-6000 I got t

USB camera; was Re: Video input vs. systemctl enable.

2017-09-20 Thread peter
* From: Reco * Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 09:20:18 +0300 > What does 'lsusb' and 'lsusb -t' show for you? peter@dalton:~$ lsusb Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Li

Re: Video input vs. systemctl enable.

2017-09-19 Thread Reco
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 03:01:03PM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > * From: Reco > * Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:16:15 +0300 > > ... load appropriate kernel modules. For USB cameras it's uvcvideo usually. > > peter@dalton:~$ lsmod | grep uvc > peter@dalton:~$ > > Indeed; not loaded as a m

Re: Video input vs. systemctl enable.

2017-09-19 Thread peter
* From: Reco * Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:16:15 +0300 > ... load appropriate kernel modules. For USB cameras it's uvcvideo usually. peter@dalton:~$ lsmod | grep uvc peter@dalton:~$ Indeed; not loaded as a module. With several camera related packages installed, no dependancy caught

Re: Video input vs. systemctl enable.

2017-09-19 Thread Reco
Hi. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:09:01AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Hi again, > > After upgrade to stretch, "systemctl enable shorewall" > was necessary to allow shorewall to start automatically. > https://wiki.debian.org/HowTo/shorewall True. > With a USB camera and a Hauppauge

Video input vs. systemctl enable.

2017-09-19 Thread peter
Hi again, After upgrade to stretch, "systemctl enable shorewall" was necessary to allow shorewall to start automatically. https://wiki.debian.org/HowTo/shorewall With a USB camera and a Hauppauge frame-grabber installed, this stretch system has no /dev/video*. Is a "systemctl enable ..." requ