Hi,
A couple people here have mentioned that Corel Linux is a limited
version of Debian with some enhancements added to it, including
a different installer and KDE. Can anyone tell me what those
things that were taken out might be? And if a new version of
Debian comes out, will it be able to upgr
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Bart Szyszka wrote:
bart >a different installer and KDE. Can anyone tell me what those
bart >things that were taken out might be? And if a new version of
from what i saw in beta 2 it was a VERY stripped version of slink. i bet
it had less then 150 packages(that were selecta
> from what i saw in beta 2 it was a VERY stripped version of slink.
Well apparently Corel made some major changes in the final because
according to this page:
http://linux.corel.com/products/linux_os/inside.htm
, Corel Linux is based on Debian 2.2. At their site I read something
about their KDE
On Thu, 18 Nov 1999, Bart Szyszka wrote:
bart >> from what i saw in beta 2 it was a VERY stripped version of slink.
bart >Well apparently Corel made some major changes in the final because
bart >according to this page:
bart >http://linux.corel.com/products/linux_os/inside.htm
something i found c
aphro wrote:
> bart >, Corel Linux is based on Debian 2.2. At their site I read something
>
> 2.2? wow ..they went from slink to potato from beta 2 to final..unless i
> read the package listing wrong i'll check it again i coulda swore it was
> glibc2.0.7
Corel linux has less than 20 potato packag
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 10:21:09PM -0500, Bart Szyszka wrote:
> > from what i saw in beta 2 it was a VERY stripped version of slink.
> Well apparently Corel made some major changes in the final because
> according to this page:
> http://linux.corel.com/products/linux_os/inside.htm
>
> , Corel Lin
On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 11:30:28PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 10:21:09PM -0500, Bart Szyszka wrote:
> > > from what i saw in beta 2 it was a VERY stripped version of slink.
> > Well apparently Corel made some major changes in the final because
> > according to this p
"Don't fix it if it isn't broken"
I hope you know what the implications of
this can be...
Regards,
Onno
aphro wrote:
>, Corel Linux is based on Debian 2.2.
> 2.2? wow ..they went from slink to potato from beta 2 to final..unless i
> read the package listing wrong i'll check it again i coulda swore it was
> glibc2.0.7
I think the point of confusion here may be that Corel Linux is based on
*kernel*
> I think the point of confusion here may be that Corel Linux is based on
> *kernel* version 2.2, not *Debian* 2.2.
> The web page says "Corel LINUX OS - based on Debian 2.2 Kernel". Huh?
> http://linux.corel.com/products/linux_os/inside.htm
That still doesn't sound entirely clear, though. It cou
On Sat, 20 Nov 1999, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
mailmi >The web page says "Corel LINUX OS - based on Debian 2.2 Kernel". Huh?
mailmi >http://linux.corel.com/products/linux_os/inside.htm
ouch, i can see where that would throw debian users off..non linux people
would automatically assume 2.2 kernel i bet .
11 matches
Mail list logo
