On this revelational Saturday, of the seventh month of 2004 you wrote:
And if this happens with something like glibc, you're hosed.
Okay, I just happen to be the poor sod you were referring to in this nugget I found in
the archives of just three months ago. What's worse is that my
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 18:02 -0400, Silvan wrote:
On Saturday 31 July 2004 10:52 am, Carl Fink wrote:
BTW, using information from
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.en.html
section 6.14, you can quite easily recompile a Sid package using the Woody
libraries to run under
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 15:59:52 -0400
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
But that's the best way it can play out. The worst way -- which is
thankfully uncommon, but can and does happen -- is if Depends or
Conflicts don't catch the problem. An example: package A in stable
Chris Metzler wrote:
But that's the best way it can play out. The worst way -- which is
thankfully uncommon, but can and does happen -- is if Depends or
Conflicts don't catch the problem. An example: package A in stable
requires libfoo version 2.4 or greater; user installs package B, which
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 01:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
[...]
(Nonetheless, I'd still like to know where all the fabled and legendary
DON'T DO THIS warnings are) (especially the one written in Martian)
Well, to be honest,
BTW, using information from
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.en.html
section 6.14, you can quite easily recompile a Sid package using the Woody
libraries to run under Woody (unless the program requires actual features
not available in the older libs).
--
Carl Fink
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:34:37 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
Okay... I got told by someone on this list: (a) that it is system
suicide,
and (b) that the fact that it is system suicide is well-documented in
many places
On Saturday 31 July 2004 10:52 am, Carl Fink wrote:
BTW, using information from
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-pkg_basics.en.html
section 6.14, you can quite easily recompile a Sid package using the Woody
libraries to run under Woody (unless the program requires actual features
not
What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
Okay... I got told by someone on this list: (a) that it is system
suicide,
and (b) that the fact that it is system suicide is well-documented in
many places with ample dire warnings in 384 languages including Martian.
But I
What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 04:57:57PM +0200, Jacob Friis Larsen wrote:
What are the dangers of using packages from both stable and testing?
You might want to look at http://backports.org, which contains many
of the Sid packages backported for use with Woody. If that doesn't
work, you might use
11 matches
Mail list logo
