Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-23 Thread Seneca Cunningham
Moments before I was going to downgrade back to X3, I got X4 working... sort-of. I finally got rid of the pixel lines and black screens with random white pixels by setting changing colour depth. The colour depth that gave those problems is 16. At 24, X could not find any working screen modes. At 1

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-17 Thread ben
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 06:46 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 January 2002 03:28 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > > > ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 16 January 2002 01:49 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > >

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-16 Thread Seneca Cunningham
ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 16 January 2002 03:28 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > > ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wednesday 16 January 2002 01:49 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > > > My hardware isn't too old... it's only 7 years old (I think (and that'

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-16 Thread ben
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 03:28 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 January 2002 01:49 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > My hardware isn't too old... it's only 7 years old (I think (and that's > > the > > > > newest stuff I'm allowed

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-16 Thread Seneca Cunningham
ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 16 January 2002 01:49 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > [snip] > > My hardware isn't too old... it's only 7 years old (I think (and that's the > > newest stuff I'm allowed to customise)). Anyway, all that I have been able > > to find out about the video se

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-16 Thread ben
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 01:49 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: [snip] > My hardware isn't too old... it's only 7 years old (I think (and that's the > newest stuff I'm allowed to customise)). Anyway, all that I have been able > to find out about the video setup is that it has a Chips and Technologi

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-16 Thread Seneca Cunningham
ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 15 January 2002 03:38 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > > > > > (EE) Error from xf86HandleConfigFile() > > > > > > > > Fatal server error: > > > > no screens found > > this is basically telling you that none of the values that might r

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-15 Thread Seneca Cunningham
ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 14 January 2002 06:30 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > [snip] > > I tried my old X3 config file, and X4 couldn't parse it... the logfile > > says: > > > > Parse warning on line 43 of section Keyboard in file XF86Config.bak > > Ignoring obsole

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-14 Thread Seneca Cunningham
ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 14 January 2002 04:56 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > > The X3 xf86config program says _not_ to probe clocks, but > > X4 looks like it is probing clocks. > > > my understanding of clock probing is that the card is either physically > capable of standing the

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-14 Thread Seneca Cunningham
ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 13 January 2002 02:11 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > [snip] > > > > > "X -configure" is... > > > > > > (==) CHIPS(0): Min pixel clock is 11.000MHz > > > (--) CHIPS(0): Max pixel clock is 56.000MHz > > > > > > ... and from the "xf86cfg -textmode" meth

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-13 Thread Seneca Cunningham
It seems that old bits of memory have been put onto the screen (as I am probably the last person to realise), when the screen is in pixel-lines. The two examples of this I have are the xf86cfg graphics going into the pixel-lines after using it without adding the "-textmode". The other, more recent

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-07 Thread Seneca Cunningham
Kent West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Seneca Cunningham wrote: > > >I have just upgraded XFree86 from 3.3.6 to 4.1.0. After completing the > >upgrade, I changed from tty1 to X's display and saw the image on the screen > >consisted of vertical lines running down my display, the top of the lines > >we

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-07 Thread Kent West
Seneca Cunningham wrote: try using xf86config, of xf86cfg to reconfigure X, and see what happens. xf86config changes my old X3 config file, and xf86cfg messes up my screen. It spews out some messages that I cannot see because the screen goes into graphics mode, then it draws an image of a

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-06 Thread dman
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 04:54:34PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote: | Jason Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Try using xf86config, of xf86cfg to reconfigure X, and see what happens. | | xf86config changes my old X3 config file, and xf86cfg messes up my screen. Try "X -configure" instead. X4

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-06 Thread Seneca Cunningham
Jason Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 04 January 2002 10:13 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > > I have just upgraded X from 3.3.6 to 4.1.0. After completing the upgrade, I > > changed from tty1 to X's display and saw the image on the screen consisted > > of vertical lines running down my d

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-06 Thread darrell
you are running an X display manager that automatically restarts the x server after it is taken down with alt-ctrl-backspace, so to solve this you have to kill the x display manager, then reconfigure x, then start the x display manager, you probably are using gdm (gnome display manager) but it

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-06 Thread Jason Wood
On Friday 04 January 2002 10:13 pm, Seneca Cunningham wrote: > I have just upgraded X from 3.3.6 to 4.1.0. After completing the upgrade, I > changed from tty1 to X's display and saw the image on the screen consisted > of vertical lines running down my display, the top of the lines were 1 > pixel in

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-06 Thread dman
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:13:00PM -0500, Seneca Cunningham wrote: | I have just upgraded X from 3.3.6 to 4.1.0. After completing the upgrade, I | changed from tty1 to X's display and saw the image on the screen consisted | of vertical lines running down my display, the top of the lines were 1 pixe

Re: What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-06 Thread nate
> How can I find out what part of X is causing this > problem? All of the bug reports of similar problems > buggy driver. i have the same problem on some systems. i just don't switch back to text mode. workaround would be to try to find an updated driver or use another video card(i highly reccom

What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-05 Thread icosahedron
I have just upgraded X from 3.3.6 to 4.1.0. After completing the upgrade, I changed from tty1 to X's display and saw the image on the screen consisted of vertical lines running down my display, the top of the lines were 1 pixel in width and the bottom width was 3 pixels, with 2 wide black horizonta

What part of X causes major display problems?

2002-01-05 Thread Seneca Cunningham
I have just upgraded X from 3.3.6 to 4.1.0. After completing the upgrade, I changed from tty1 to X's display and saw the image on the screen consisted of vertical lines running down my display, the top of the lines were 1 pixel in width and the bottom width was 3 pixels, with 2 wide black horizonta