On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:21:58 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What this error mean?
> >
> > * hdc: dma_intr: status = 0x51 {driveready seekcomplete
> > error} hdc: dma_intr : error = 0x84 {drive statuserror
> > badcrc}
>
Normally bad drive.Can also be a proble
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:21:58 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In my case it was shitty EIDE code in the kernel screwing up my VIA
> chipset (I think that's the name) (which is also shitty or even
> shittier I find out) and causing massive problems with data
> corruptions and really poor perf
What this error mean?
* hdc: dma_intr: status = 0x51 {driveready seekcomplete
error} hdc: dma_intr : error = 0x84 {drive statuserror
badcrc}
tks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Mon, Aug 11, 2003, Listas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What this error mean?
>
> * hdc: dma_intr: status = 0x51 {driveready seekcomplete
> error} hdc: dma_intr : error = 0x84 {drive statuserror
> badcrc}
It means "bad mojo, get your data off that disk ASAP and then fling
Hello
Listas (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> What this error mean?
>
> * hdc: dma_intr: status = 0x51 {driveready seekcomplete
> error} hdc: dma_intr : error = 0x84 {drive statuserror
> badcrc}
The error message sounds like you have data transfer errors with your
harddisk.
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 08:56:21 -0700
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:49:31 -0400 (EDT)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > This is not a debian kernel is it?
>
> All kernels are debian kernels.
>
> apt-cache show kernel-package
I used to compile from kernel.org, with
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 09:19:57AM -0300, Listas wrote:
> What this error mean?
>
> * hdc: dma_intr: status = 0x51 {driveready seekcomplete
> error} hdc: dma_intr : error = 0x84 {drive statuserror
> badcrc}
Is hdc a CD-ROM or a hard disk drive on your system?
If the latter:
Thu
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:49:31 -0400 (EDT)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> This is not a debian kernel is it?
>
> All kernels are debian kernels.
>
> apt-cache show kernel-package
>
kernel-image versus kernel-source.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:49:31 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is not a debian kernel is it?
All kernels are debian kernels.
apt-cache show kernel-package
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connectio
Listas wrote:
What this error mean?
* hdc: dma_intr: status = 0x51 {driveready seekcomplete
error} hdc: dma_intr : error = 0x84 {drive statuserror
badcrc}
tks
Generally it means your system is having trouble reading the /dev/hdc
device (probably your CD-ROM drive?). Dirty CDROM? Scratched
On Monday 11 Aug 2003 15:51, Johann Koenig wrote:
>
> /dev/hda:
> Timing buffer-cache reads: 268 MB in 2.02 seconds = 132.67 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 100 MB in 3.02 seconds = 33.11 MB/sec
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$
>
> It's a little low right now, I've gotten close to 200 buffer-cac
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:21:58 -0400 (EDT)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> In my case it was shitty EIDE code in the kernel screwing up my VIA
>> chipset (I think that's the name) (which is also shitty or even
>> shittier I find out) and causing massive problems with data
>> corruptions and really
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:05:59 -0400 (EDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> kernel-image versus kernel-source.
Yes, and it is well known and well documented that when you install Linux
with a prebuilt kernel that two things are going to be true.
1: The kernel is going to be far larger than needed as
> What this error mean?
>
> * hdc: dma_intr: status = 0x51 {driveready seekcomplete
> error} hdc: dma_intr : error = 0x84 {drive statuserror
> badcrc}
I've been staring at this error for months now and it sucks.
It may be a flakey drive.
It may be a dirtly CD-ROM.
In my cas
14 matches
Mail list logo
