On Sat, 2001-09-15 at 06:34, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> Sid *is* unstable. Sid will not be a release name, it's essentially an
> alias for "unstable".
Yeah, that's what I meant
> You are advised to start tracking woody now if you want to transition to
> it. Think of Debian less as tracking a s
On Friday 14 September 2001 09:34 pm, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> That isn't phrased right. Sid *is* unstable. Woody will transition
> towards "stable", first going to freeze, then hitting release.
>
Speaking of which, how far are we from freeze? What's still to be done?
- David Nusinow
[EMAIL P
on Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 08:23:27PM +0200, Mario Vukelic ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I've moved my laptop to sid, mainly to try unstable (I've been
> running woody on both my machines for several months now) and to get a
> working gnome.
>
> This is the first time I experience a
Hi,
Recently I've moved my laptop to sid, mainly to try unstable (I've been
running woody on both my machines for several months now) and to get a
working gnome.
This is the first time I experience a debian release cycle (I started
with potato when it was already stable). I intend to run woody fo
4 matches
Mail list logo
