Leonardo Ruoso wrote:
>
> Oh thanks... not so confuse... so usefull. But I know it's dificult to
> learn all in a couple of minutes far away from the information.
>
> thanks anyway
>
> p.s. I will install a linux machine at work and start to experiment. I'm
> not sure about RH or Debian.
On Mon, 30 Mar 1998, [iso-8859-1] Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra wrote:
> >I'm
> >not sure about RH or Debian. It's because here in Brazil Debian is not
> >used a lot. No local support or consultant.
>
> Perhaps we could set a local mailing list?
I don't think that's really a good ide
>Is there "Login scripts" or similars?
Oh, just remembered! You need only create a netlogon share with
Samba...
>Oh thanks... not so confuse... so usefull. But I know it's dificult lo
>learn all in a couple of minutes far away from the information.
>
> thanks anyway
>
>p.s. I will install a
Leonardo Ruoso wrote:
> Oh thanks... not so confuse... so usefull. But I know it's dificult lo
> learn all in a couple of minutes far away from the information.
yes it is true...it takes a while to switch the thinking from "windows mode" to
"linux mode"alot of things work under a differnt set of
> So. UNIX is NOT for WORKSTATIONS. Is this true?
No. But things are harder for starters than in NT. Only that if
using NT, after 12 months you will have been left with a system crying
to be reinstalled perhaps. And will still not have had to reboot even
once if you are using Linux...
>
Oh thanks... not so confuse... so usefull. But I know it's dificult lo
learn all in a couple of minutes far away from the information.
thanks anyway
p.s. I will install a linux machine at work and start to experiment. I'm
not sure about RH or Debian. It's because here in Brazil De
Leonardo Ruoso wrote:
> YEAH! I'm not a UNIX Wizard. I know a litle about TCP/IP networks. I am
> just receiveing my books on Linux next week from amazon. I agree that
> UNIX can do what NT can do.
thats a good start :)
> So. UNIX is NOT for WORKSTATIONS. Is this true?
absolutley not! i
YEAH! I'm not a UNIX Wizard. I know a litle about TCP/IP networks. I am
just receiveing my books on Linux next week from amazon. I agree that
UNIX can do what NT can do.
So. UNIX is NOT for WORKSTATIONS. Is this true?
If I agree to change every NT and NW host by a UNIX host I wil
You can do all that and more...but...it is not exactly the same
for instance...the concept of "mapping drives" is well...not a Unix type
concept :)
but every l-user ( I am in service..I fix PCs...I say luser because I deal with
the
worst of the lot)
has (in the normal configuration) their own "ho
I'd like to know if Linux can do what NT can do in a client X server
configuration. Let me explain. I don't want every workstation user an
network/system administrator. With NT I can configure from server wich
volumes will be maped for each user, wich workstation each user will be
granted access, w
I want to install Linux in my company as the main server, file server
and database server. Which one should I install? what the diference
between then?
Leonardo Ruoso
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo