On 09/01/2023 13:20, Sadhu Santh wrote:
If not, why the upstream structure
is not made simpler?
If I remember correctly, current repository layout minimizes traffic at
the moment of new release. .deb packages are already synced as a part of
testing suite. Almost certainly it is explained
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 01:59:50PM +0530, Sadhu Santh wrote:
>
> > > I am hosting a local Debian mirror for my LAN. This helps in low internet
> > > bandwidth use.
> > >
> > > I keep only the required distributions (past five years and testing
> > > release).
> > >
> > > Compared to other
On 09/01/23 17:48, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:50:23AM +0530, Sadhu Santh wrote:
Hi,
I am hosting a local Debian mirror for my LAN. This helps in low internet
bandwidth use.
I keep only the required distributions (past five years and testing
release).
Compared to
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 07:35:18 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 07:18:53 -0500
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> > The best solution, IMHO, is to mirror using a tool that is aware of
> > the specific structure of apt repositories. Personally, I have had
> > excellent success with
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 07:18:53 -0500
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> The best solution, IMHO, is to mirror using a tool that is aware of
> the specific structure of apt repositories. Personally, I have had
> excellent success with apt-cacher-ng, which functions much like a
> squid proxy. You
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:50:23AM +0530, Sadhu Santh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am hosting a local Debian mirror for my LAN. This helps in low internet
> bandwidth use.
>
> I keep only the required distributions (past five years and testing
> release).
>
> Compared to other distributions such
Hi,
I am hosting a local Debian mirror for my LAN. This helps in low
internet bandwidth use.
I keep only the required distributions (past five years and testing
release).
Compared to other distributions such ArchLinux/RockyLinux (single line
Rsync can do the job), the partial mirroring
7 matches
Mail list logo
