On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 12:40:21PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
[...]
> > I think it's an antipattern, but of course anyone's mileage may vary.
>
> Having had to explain "computer stuff" to various people over the time
> (often older than me) I found the folder analogy to be easier to
>
On Ma, 01 sep 20, 15:53:17, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 06:48:22AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> > On 2020-09-01 at 04:29, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > > [1] Why people keep insisting in calling those things "folders" is
> > >beyond me. They don't "fold" anything, do
On 2020-09-01 23:11, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:03:27AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, September 01, 2020 04:29:55 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[1] Why people keep insisting in calling those things "folders" is
beyond me. They don't "fold" anything, do
In fact it used to be called directory, before GUI shells emerged.
So MS DOS to dispaly content of "folder" used command named dir.
Cheers,
Marek Mosiewicz
W dniu wto, 01.09.2020 o godzinie 06∶48 -0400, użytkownik The Wanderer
napisał:
> On 2020-09-01 at 04:29, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> >
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:34:59AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:08:45PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > That depends on context, program, etc. But if you give the program
> > an absolute path, every directory from the root down to the file
> > has to be readable for
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:08:45PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> That depends on context, program, etc. But if you give the program
> an absolute path, every directory from the root down to the file
> has to be readable for your program.
Every directory in the path must have the +x bit for
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:03:27AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 01, 2020 04:29:55 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > [1] Why people keep insisting in calling those things "folders" is
> >beyond me. They don't "fold" anything, do they?
>
> (My day to make extraneous
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:02:18PM +1000, elvis wrote:
>
> On 1/9/20 6:29 pm, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 04:57:28PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> >
> >[...]
> >
> >>Just to be clear, the folder I had to change permissions on is the
> >> >>document root,
> >To be able to access
On Tuesday, September 01, 2020 04:29:55 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> [1] Why people keep insisting in calling those things "folders" is
>beyond me. They don't "fold" anything, do they?
(My day to make extraneous responses? ;-)
Historical: file folders hold documents in file cabinets...
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 9:34 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:30:15AM -0400, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> > Directories go back, even before Windows: The MSDOS Equivalent to ls is
> > dir, which I "guess" means "List Directory".
> >
> > Ah yes, the "Good old days".
>
> Yup, but very
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:05:32AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:29:55AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > [1] Why people keep insisting in calling those things "folders" is
> >beyond me. They don't "fold" anything, do they?
>
> It's a Microsoft Windows thing.
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 06:48:22AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2020-09-01 at 04:29, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > [1] Why people keep insisting in calling those things "folders" is
> >beyond me. They don't "fold" anything, do they?
>
> As I understand matters, it's an extension of the
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:30:15AM -0400, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> Directories go back, even before Windows: The MSDOS Equivalent to ls is
> dir, which I "guess" means "List Directory".
>
> Ah yes, the "Good old days".
Yup, but very few of the Microsoft Windows users today have a background
in
elvis wrote:
>
> On 1/9/20 6:29 pm, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 04:57:28PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Just to be clear, the folder I had to change permissions on is the
> > > > > document root,
> > To be able to access a file given its path, you
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 8:05 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:29:55AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > [1] Why people keep insisting in calling those things "folders" is
> >beyond me. They don't "fold" anything, do they?
>
> It's a Microsoft Windows thing. Windows
On 1/9/20 6:29 pm, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 04:57:28PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
[...]
Just to be clear, the folder I had to change permissions on is the
To be able to access a file given its path, you need to have read
access to each directory [1] along that path.
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:29:55AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> [1] Why people keep insisting in calling those things "folders" is
>beyond me. They don't "fold" anything, do they?
It's a Microsoft Windows thing. Windows presents directories and
files graphically, and the icon for a
On 2020-09-01 at 04:29, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> [1] Why people keep insisting in calling those things "folders" is
>beyond me. They don't "fold" anything, do they?
As I understand matters, it's an extension of the "desktop" metaphor.
Back before computers (and to some extent afterward),
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 04:57:28PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
[...]
> Just to be clear, the folder I had to change permissions on is the
> document root,
To be able to access a file given its path, you need to have read
access to each directory [1] along that path. There isn't another
way, and
On 2020-08-31 21:57, Gary Dale wrote:
Just to be clear, the folder I had to change permissions on is the
I think the document root is just where apache2 looks first.
*Don't know if you are supposed to do it like that* but think the actual
html files can be anywhere so long as they have the
On 2020-08-31 15:59, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2020-08-31 15:14, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2020-08-30 13:24, john doe wrote:
On 8/30/2020 7:08 PM, john doe wrote:
On 8/30/2020 6:27 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running Apache 2.4.38-3+deb10u3 on a Debian/Stable server on an
AMD64 machine.
When I create a
On 2020-08-31 15:14, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2020-08-30 13:24, john doe wrote:
On 8/30/2020 7:08 PM, john doe wrote:
On 8/30/2020 6:27 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
I'm running Apache 2.4.38-3+deb10u3 on a Debian/Stable server on an
AMD64 machine.
When I create a virtual host under /var/www, everything
22 matches
Mail list logo
