Might as well draw some attention with a good subject line ;-P
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:50:02AM +0200, Ivan Savcic wrote:
While we're on the topic, can anyone sum it up, what do people
generally think is bad with Debian?
The only thing I think is bad about debian is the perception of it
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Andrew Sackville-West
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Oh, and the other thing I don't like is how darn easy it is. It makes
it hard to learn anything past a certain point... hence my occaisional
attempts to do things the hard way...
Agree! Agree completely!
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Andrew Sackville-West
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might as well draw some attention with a good subject line ;-P
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:50:02AM +0200, Ivan Savcic wrote:
While we're on the topic, can anyone sum it up, what do people
generally think is
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 06:24:41PM +0200, Ivan Savcic wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Andrew Sackville-West
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Might as well draw some attention with a good subject line ;-P
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:50:02AM +0200, Ivan Savcic wrote:
While we're on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/04/08 11:24, Ivan Savcic wrote:
[snip]
But mixing branches (stable, testing and unstable) is a no-no, because
they depend on different versions of libraries.
People quite often mix testing and unstable. Still, though, it's
easier to stay
5 matches
Mail list logo
